0

Let A mean "Equation A has a solution" and B mean "Equation B has no solution." I am a little confused, so I wrote down some possibilities and I wish to see if my interpretation of the following is correct:

  1. Equations A and B both have no solutions. In symbols: ~A /\ ~B.
  2. Neither equation A nor B has a solution. In symbols: ~(A \/ B).
  3. Both equations A and B have no solutions. In symbols: ~(A \/ B).

If I'm correct, I want to know intuitively the difference between (1) and (3). Thanks.

1
  • The three statements are all logically equivalent, there is no difference truth-functionally. But if B is supposed to mean "Equation B has no solution", then you need to invert the negations on it. – lemontree Aug 7 '20 at 10:57
0

For statements 1 and 3 you are looking at examples of De Morgan's Laws.

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan%27s_laws

The complement of the union of two sets is the same as the intersection of their complements; and The complement of the intersection of two sets is the same as the union of their complements. or

not (A or B) = not A and not B; and
not (A and B) = not A or not B

And LemontTree has a good point as well.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.