I was wondering...since Frege stablishes a difference between the sense of a sign (the mode of presentation of a reference), it's reference (the actual object in the world) and the representation of it (the interior mental image we make from this reference), is it correct to say that, while the reference of an expression is objective and the representation of it is subjective, it's sense situates itself in a intersubjective domain?
And, if so, since we can know the reference through the senses and since we construct the mental representation of it by psychological processes, how do we grasp the sense of an expression? How do we apreehend it? By wich means?
Fell free to correct me in anything if I commited a mistake in my exposition of this subject.
Thanks for the attention!