Regarding insightful feedback to my answer to Can a category of non-difference exist in Western logic? and in conjunction with alternative responses, I am asking if the following formulation is a consistent essential characterization of 'non-difference' (as understood in the invocation of ahebda).

Non-difference is essentially an ontological presupposition regarding mereological flexibility in identity to accommodate metaphysical pluralism (such as how anekantavada rejects metaphysical absolutism).

  • @dbmag9 Thanks for your reply! – J D Oct 27 '20 at 18:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.