Is logic relative like Einstein's Special Relativity or is it absolute? I am thinking it is absolute, but at the same time I am inclined to think that it's not as simple as you may think.
- (Logic) the branch of philosophy concerned with analysing the patterns of reasoning by which a conclusion is properly drawn from a set of premises, without reference to meaning or context. See also formal logic, deduction4, induction4
- (Logic) any particular formal system in which are defined axioms and rules of inference. Compare formal system, formal language
- the system and principles of reasoning used in a specific field of study
- a particular method of argument or reasoning
- force or effectiveness in argument or dispute
- reasoned thought or argument, as distinguished from irrationality
- the relationship and interdependence of a series of events, facts, etc
- (Logic) chop logic to use excessively subtle or involved logic or argument
- (Computer Science) electronics computing a. the principles underlying the units in a computer system that perform arithmetical and logical operations. See also logic circuit b. (as modifier): a logic element.
So logic is also and essentially a natural capacity of the human brain, the result of natural selection over millions of years, possibly billions. So, in that sense, it is contingent on life itself, possibly life on Earth.
This also means that every human being has the same logic and that personal experience, training, learning, cannot affect this capacity. We can think of it in the same way we do languages. You can learn different languages, you can become more articulate, fluent, talkative etc. but your native linguistic capacity is not affected. Same for logic. You can invent any number of arguments or reasonings, you can create any number of mathematical theories, but your innate logical capacity is not affected.
Perhaps the question is whether there could be a better logic. Maybe yes, but then who is going to make it? Nobody on Earth is going to beat natural selection. No engineering company could come anywhere near emulating the process of natural selection.
So, maybe some Alien species somewhere in the universe got better logic, but maybe the snag is whether your logic is good for the kind of environment you live in. So better logic over there may not translate as better logic here on Earth. We are probably incapable of producing ourselves a better logic. We are aware of logic broadly since Aristotle 2,500 years ago and we still cannot produce a correct formal model of it, so improving on it would be not for any time soon.
So, logic is not absolute. It is contingent on life, or perhaps only on the kind of physics our universe has. Maybe there couldn't be any better logic than the one we have. It is easy to conceive of the possibility of the same logic implemented on a bigger and faster brain, in particular a machine, but improving on human deductive logic itself seems beyond even our power of imagination.
And for people who think that my view is irrational or somehow unfounded, this is not just me saying this. Here is what a research scientist from the Innovative Computing Laboratory (University of Tennessee) says about logic:
Logic is inherent in the structure of neurons.
So, no, we cannot claim we know that this is true, but it is way more plausible than anything else, and indeed the only rational perspective to have on the subject given what we know about logic.