-2

A lot times, though not all, when people do something they feel it is particularly righteous, it is a very shortsighted approach that lacks a more holistic consideration of other variables. Is there a name for this tendency of where the more right someone thinks they are, the more damage they end up causing? It's almost like a kind of high-risk high-reward situation.

6
  • Such people are commonly and disparagingly referred to as "do-gooders". I haven't come across an equivalent verb or abstract noun. – Guy Inchbald Nov 6 '20 at 13:27
  • Welcome to SE Philosophy! Thanks for your contribution. Please take a quick moment to take the tour or find help. You can perform searches here or seek additional clarification at the meta site. Don't forget, when someone has answered your question, you can click on the checkmark to reward the contributor. – J D Nov 6 '20 at 17:03
  • 1
    Fascinating question, but questions of the form "Is there an English word which means...?" is appropriate on English Language &Usage SE. Here's an example of such a question. If you have questions about the concepts involved, then you're back on this site. – J D Nov 6 '20 at 17:06
  • See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect – christo183 Nov 9 '20 at 8:51
  • @christo183 I'm familiar with the dunning kruger effect but this is too specific, this is related to the assumption of an answer in relation to prestige. Instead, it is perfectly feasible for one approach a solution non-egotistically and still arrive at the original problem in a different form. – Newmathquestions2 Nov 16 '20 at 22:05
0

Answer

I still believe this Q&A belongs on English Language & Usage, but since it hasn't been deleted yet, no sense in letting the question going on unanswered. So...

Like Guy Inchabald, I'm not familiar with a single word in English that meets your specifications, however, there are some related phrases. First, consider the phrase 'The road to hell is paved with good intentions'. It's a well-established idea among peddlers of saws and adages that more than not bad actions are because of ignorant people. Sometimes it is expressed as 'There are no bad people, only good people with bad ideas.' It also has attained the status of philosophical razor in the form of Hanlon's Razor where one is entreated to consider that it is more likely bad outcomes are a result of ignorance rather than malice.

If we were to attempt to use a phrase in a context, one could just use the adjective 'well-intentioned', 'incompetent', or 'ham-handed'. So, let's take a number of terms such as do-gooder and use adjectival modifiers:

incompetent do-gooder, ham-handed meddler, well-intentioned bull in a china shop, condescending noblesse oblige, etc.

The important thing is that we find two words that carry a contemptuous connotation while encapsulating both denotative elements of 'failure, badness, incompetence' and 'well-intentioned, trying to achieve goodness, etc.'.

Now, as to the second part, is there some sort of theoretical term related to this rather common narrational trope? I came across this entry: TV Tropes: Well-Intentioned Extremist.

A villain who has an overall goal which the heroes can appreciate in principle, but whose methods of pursuing said goal (such as mass murder) are problematic; despite any sympathy they may have with their cause, the heroes have no choice but to stop them. Taken to extremes, they may fully believe that Utopia Justifies the Means. Such an idealistic extremist is likely to be either a Totalitarian Utilitarian or a Principles Zealot, depending on whether they’re aiming For Happiness or For Great Justice. The most well-written examples of this trope are the kind that the reader/viewer stops just short of agreeing with.

This is related to the psychological term 'true believer' which is used to describe a person who has generally is involved in a mass movement or other political ideology who acts in accordance with a representation of the world that tends to be highly resistant to empirical evidence.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.