1

A simple question for all you logicians out there, I'm sure:

"An adaptive household has a diverse livehood portfolio and is healthy, but is not always natural resource reliant."

Is there a way to express this? p,q,r=livelihood, health, and natural resource reliance, respectively. I guess r would be expressed as the subjunctive mood, but I don't know if that applies in sentential logic.

Thanks!

|improve this question
  • p AND q AND (NOT r) would be one way of doing things, provided p q r stood for the appropriate propositions – David H Aug 2 '13 at 15:00
2

What may be tripping you up is that the truth of "household is natural resource reliant" has no impact at all on the truth of "household is adaptive".

...so the formula for what you've said is:
"is adaptive" = "has diverse livehood portfolio" AND "is healthy"

The truth table would be (with no "household is adaptive" listed, because it is unnecessary):

  • "has diverse livehood portfolio" ; "is healthy" : "is adaptive"
  • 0 ; 0 : 0
  • 0 ; 1 : 0
  • 1 ; 0 : 0
  • 1 ; 1 : 1

If you really want to include "is natural resource reliant", you would end up with:

  • "has diverse livehood portfolio" ; "is healthy" ; "is natural resource reliant" : "is adaptive"
  • 0 ; 0 ; 0 : 0
  • 0 ; 0 ; 1 : 0
  • 0 ; 1 ; 0 : 0
  • 0 ; 1 ; 1 : 0
  • 1 ; 0 ; 0 : 0
  • 1 ; 0 ; 1 : 0
  • 1 ; 1 ; 0 : 1
  • 1 ; 1 ; 1 : 1

...where, again, you can see that "is natural resource reliant" has no impact.

|improve this answer
  • Is that the same as the syntax David H. mentioned? – Lanny Yassier Aug 3 '13 at 2:09
  • @LannyYassier No. p AND q AND (NOT r) would match the statement "An adaptive household has a diverse livehood portfolio and is healthy, but is not natural resource reliant." p AND q is what matches the statement you gave. – A.M. Aug 3 '13 at 2:22
  • 1
    @LannyYassier Of course there are two ways to read "not always x". I read it as "not always [natural resource reliant]", whereas he appears to have read it as "not [always natural resource reliant]", in which case his formula would be correct. – A.M. Aug 3 '13 at 2:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.