Structuralism states we are governed by narrow cultural structures.

I believe post-modernism and post-structuralism acknowledge the existence of this structures as well.

Is the difference in the attitude towards the structure? Like post-modernism wants to deconstruct some category like gender, while structuralism adhere to the natural categorization.

Please correct me, if I made any wrong assumptions.

  • 2
    Yes. Structuralism is "the methodology that implies that elements of human culture must be understood by way of their relationship to a broader system. It works to uncover the structures that underlie all the things that humans do, think, perceive, and feel." Nov 25 '20 at 14:39
  • Thanks. But what about post-modernism, as far as I understand it also believes in the existence of cultural structures, it just considers them bad. Is the difference in the value judgement.
    – Borut Flis
    Nov 26 '20 at 23:12

To illustrate the difference using two writers usually held up as examples of the respective categories, Claude Lévi-Strauss (Structuralist) tries to demonstrate that the same universal structures, especially binary oppositions, underlie all human thought across different societies. Michel Foucault (Poststructuralist) acknowledges that all societies are governed by a structure (episteme), but doesn't use a universal formula in order to uncover it; thus his studies tend to highlight the unusual.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.