I am radically in favor of freedom of expression. The way to deal with that is by undoing arguments over and over. It takes work, but I see it as necessary.
However, as I am seeing various contacts advocating for the elimination of listening to both sides (more specifically regarding COVID), I am wondering if freedom of speech should be limited or not?
What are the consequences of limiting the speech? And the pros?
I do see the limitation of speech as too much, even if the other side has stupid ideas. I think that it is always possible to fight ideas with ideas and speech with speech. And if one is right then one must have an advantage in the debate. This has to come.
Regarding freedom of speech, more specifically the decision points regarding that lead to its limitation, I have asked another question.