I’ve been reading Michel de Montaigne, who warns against any flight of imagination as it’s his observation that it becomes manifest, either in the sense of delusion or even physiologically. 400-odd years later, I don’t think it’s controversial to say that this is widely accepted, albeit still poorly understood — e.g., the placebo effect — but perhaps not to the degree that Montaigne describes.

That seems to mark imagination as a “bad thing”, in the sense that it causes you harm, under Montaigne’s brand of Stoic-Epicurean philosophy. However, in my mind, that’s a very broad brush; human imagination clearly has its benefits and certainly shouldn’t be maligned or rejected outright. I don’t believe creativity is possible without imagination, for example, and creativity is an ostensibly “good thing”.

Are these three viewpoints genuinely in conflict, or are they reconcilable?

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.