It may be in some subfield of ethics, I guess. But I'm interested in knowing about protection: I mean, if we know someone who's doing something wrong with his/her life, what should we do? Intervene and try to help, or ignore because it's none of our businesses?

I'm looking for resources on this.

  • 1
    Are you really interested in philosophical perspectives, as opposed to medical/psychological/legal (more pragmatic) ones? – user3164 Dec 11 '13 at 19:47
  • 1
    Yes. Philosophical. – Billy Rubina Dec 11 '13 at 20:25
  • Is there a specific type of issue you have in mind? This type of problem occurs in medical ethics. It's less likely to occur in standard moral theories. But in most cases there will need to be something going on that compromises the rights of selves to self-determination. – virmaior Mar 9 '14 at 23:30
  • in philosophy and law (and some of the medical ethics literature i've seen) this issue is called "paternalism". that should help you narrow down your search a bit. – shane Jul 29 '14 at 15:12
  • this is a great subject but may i suggest a title change to something like "ethical study of protective intervention and responsibility" ? – amphibient Jun 6 '17 at 22:09

John Stuart Mill's On Liberty is composed to address your question, when and when not to interfere the liberty of others, as an individual and as a society as a whole.

This BBC presentation is a great intro to the book: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9IM3ZKNMCk

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.