They both seem to suggest that objects are not defined by their discrete appearances but rather by the conceptual framework which allows us to perceive them. In case of Wittgenstein the world is all that is the case whereas in case of Hegel, via the thesis, the negation of the thesis and then the negation of the negation we are able to understand things. This means things are not objects but rather the process we go through to understand them ?
There is certainly a similarity between Wittgenstein's claim that the world is a collection of facts, not things, and Hegel's claim that objects are not things but forces. Both suggest that our understanding of objects is shaped by a conceptual framework, and that this framework is more important than the discrete appearances of objects.
However, there are also some important differences between the two claims. For Wittgenstein, the world is all that is the case, which means that our understanding of the world is shaped by the totality of facts. For Hegel, on the other hand, objects are only understandable within the context of a dialectical process, whereby we move from thesis to antithesis to synthesis. This suggests that our understanding of things is not static, but rather dynamic and constantly evolving.