Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 175 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Visit Stack Exchange

Questions tagged [antinatalism]

The tag has no usage guidance.

3
votes
3answers
284 views

Is Benatar's “asymmetry of pleasure and pain” wrong?

I’ve some doubts regarding the epistyle of David Benatar's thought, the “asymmetry of pleasure and pain”. In Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence he writes that: Both good ...
2
votes
1answer
44 views

Why does Parfit judge implausible the impersonal average view?

Source: Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been (2008 1 edn). pp. 171-172.   Although the impersonal average view also solves the nonidentity problem, it too cannot be Theory X, for it faces ...
2
votes
1answer
195 views

Does antinatalism carry the seeds of its own destruction?

Antinatalists claim that it is immoral to procreate. For instance: David Benatar argues there is an asymmetry between pleasure and pain, which means it would be better for humans not to have ...
1
vote
1answer
44 views

How may there be more people than there could be for very long, if there'll never be more people than there could be? [closed]

Source: Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been (2008 1 edn). pp. 165-166. I don't understand the semantic distinction between 1 and 2 beneath. OVERPOPULATION At the time this is being ...
1
vote
1answer
106 views

Is antinatalism against any kind of producing new minds (people)?

My argument is "it's better never to be a child". Being transhumanist, I assert it's better for new people to be produced adults right away, skipping the childhood part and believe it will be possible....
1
vote
0answers
415 views

Is Buddhism antinatalist?

I was listening to a discussion with David Benatar, and the point that Buddhism seems to be antinatalist was raised. It seems that people argue this both ways. Can Buddhism be said to be antinatalist? ...
0
votes
3answers
103 views

How can you soundly argue for antinatalism based on lack of consent?

Of the many arguments that bolster antinatalism, I'm contemplating only consent here: Consent: The fact that life contains suffering might be tolerable under certain circumstances, i.e. if one ...
0
votes
2answers
181 views

What's incongruous in this joke? ‘Never to be born would be the best thing […] But this happens to scarcely 1 person in 100,000.’

Source: Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been (2008 1 edn). pp. 3 Bottom - 4 Top. WHO IS SO LUCKY? A version of the view I defend in this book is the subject of some humour: Life is ...
0
votes
0answers
30 views

How can you mistake whether your being born is better, if you are everlastingly happy to have been born?

Source: Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been (2008 1 edn). pp. 58-59.   Now it may be objected that one cannot possibly be mistaken about whether one’s existence is preferable to non-...
0
votes
0answers
13 views

Why are cases involving instrumental goods, the only unambiguous cases of someone lacking a good and not thereby being disadvantaged?

Source: Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been (2008 1 edn). pp. 43 - 43. I don't understand 1 and 2 beneath. I read about Intrinsic vs. Instrumental Good.   Some people have difficulty ...
0
votes
0answers
56 views

Why does 'not bad' more informatively evaluate than 'not good'?

Source: Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been (2008 1 edn). pp. 39-40. I don't understand 2 beneath. Based on 1, can't I argue symmetrically, and oppositely, that: "when the absence of pleasure ...
0
votes
0answers
22 views

Where does Benatar defend in 'Better Never to Have Been' that (though logically possible) absence of pleasure can't be bad?

Source: Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been (2008 1 edn). pp. 30 Bottom - 31 Top. [...] it strikes me as true that (3) the absence of pain is good, even if that good is not enjoyed ...
0
votes
0answers
63 views

Why can a human never have a child for a potential child's sake?

Source: Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been (2008 1 edn). [p. 2 Top:]  Creating new people, by having babies, is so much a part of human life that it is rarely thought even to require a ...