Questions tagged [argumentation]
The construction, deconstruction and presentation of arguments for a position;
540
questions
9
votes
11
answers
3k
views
Is there a name for the widespread logical fallacy in which you prove your point by 'eliminating' anyone who contradicts you?
I've encountered this relentlessly in my life. You offer proof that someone is wrong, or even simply state something more obvious than the sun that they don't like, they ban you or do something else ...
3
votes
3
answers
145
views
Doubts about common sense through recourse to an alleged authority
Given is following dialog:
A: So you deny that the sun will rise again tomorrow?
B: No, I just say we do not know for sure. There are other variants.
A: What other variants are there?
B: What do I ...
19
votes
19
answers
4k
views
If philosophy is based on reason and rationality, then why is there so much disagreement?
If philosophy is based on reason and rationality, then why is there so much disagreement?
Is it due primarily to operating with different premises absent consensus on their truth, so that dissenters ...
2
votes
1
answer
66
views
Precise definition of valid argument using model theory
In philosophy 101, I learned that a valid argument is any argument that satisfies this property: if all of its premises are true, then its conclusion must hold true.
Now, I am taking a class on ...
13
votes
11
answers
1k
views
Should reducing and simplifying explanations be a core aspect of Philosophical practice?
I'm an Engineer, and a Computer Programmer. But I repeat myself... For me, my life and breath is getting to the bottom of complex things and rendering an explanation or instantiation (for programs) ...
1
vote
1
answer
58
views
A question on contrapositives and predicates
So I am a freshman taking an intro class to logic. And the question started off from a class exercise we've got which asked us to identify the covering generalization for the following conditional ...
3
votes
3
answers
148
views
Do arguments arising from probability convincingly argue a mass human extinction event in the near future? [closed]
One such argument is the Doomsday argument which is taken seriously by a number of academics. But more simply, if we look at the modern population trajectory, it's something of an exponential curve. ...
16
votes
5
answers
5k
views
Is there a name for the argumentative tactic where you play dumb and ask for extreme simplification?
My day job is research in economics. In economics seminar culture, a common way to demolish the speaker is to play dumb and say "I don't understand what you are saying", implying that the ...
1
vote
4
answers
199
views
How strong is the argument for quantum mind theory?
I know little about philosophy and I've been reading into consciousness. From an uneducated view, David Pearce's argument seems strong.
https://www.biointelligence-explosion.com/parable.html
What ...
-2
votes
2
answers
131
views
What is a philosophical proposition?
There seems to be confusion on this exchange as to what constitutes a proposition in philosophy. This seems to extend to the burden of proof. The classical burden of proof is "onus probandi ...
0
votes
0
answers
59
views
What kind of rhetorical device is 'splaining?
It is quite common for people to respond to an issue or question with the first thing that comes to mind, framed as a convincing explanation. When it appears to be a self-serving or unwarranted ...
2
votes
1
answer
56
views
Are transcendental and indispensability arguments reciprocally structured?
This question occurred to me in the course of addressing a recent question about what counts as evidence in philosophy. There, I offered that transcendental arguments are structurally akin to ...
5
votes
6
answers
551
views
What constitutes evidence in philosophy?
I have noticed an apparent confusion when posing and answering questions as to what constitutes evidence in philosophy. Especially in scientifically-related areas, I often cite scientific evidence ...
6
votes
3
answers
1k
views
Do some philosophical questions tend to entertain vacuous ideas?
Empty, inane, devoid of value. This is a dictionary definition of the word "vacuous". Are vacuous ideas worthy of consideration? I mean no offence, but I fail to see the sensible intent ...
0
votes
4
answers
208
views
Is reason under challenge? [closed]
I find the resurgence in the new century of pseudoscience, religious extremism, and irrationalism disturbing. Reason was pre-eminent throughout the previous two centuries. Is reason being seriously ...
3
votes
9
answers
3k
views
What is the burden of proof? Has this principle ever been challenged?
I have been surprised to find that some people doubt this principle. Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat - the burden of proof lies with the speaker, not with the one who negates. I ...
1
vote
1
answer
178
views
Should proofs of God involve the infinitary language ℒ(∞,∞)?
If God is an infinite being (per Scotus, say), and if no finite number of steps in an argument is adequate to the scope of the divine majesty, then the strictures of monadic theism aside (God as a ...
3
votes
2
answers
310
views
The Likelyhood Principle and Baysean Statistics
I am reading Kotzen's paper Selection Bias in Likelihood Arguments.
The author takes the following principle as a starting point:
I'm confused as to how to formalize this notion in terms of Bayesian ...
2
votes
0
answers
53
views
How to best develop writing and argumentation skills on a philosophy self-study track?
I am about to embark on a journey of Philosophy self-study. I have a curriculum I want to pursue, covering all majour branches of philosophy. I also have a reading list which includes set texts, text ...
2
votes
1
answer
69
views
Examples of situations where explaining the situation destabilizes the mind [closed]
Could someone please provide, using logic, or some other reasoning or portrayal, an example of a situation where explaining the situation destabilizes the mind?
Thank you.
1
vote
3
answers
68
views
Argument analysis question
A simple question for those familiar with argument analysis / formalization. Can you elaborate and explain what is going on in the following two arguments? They appear to lead to opposing conclusions ...
0
votes
1
answer
109
views
What is the justification of a complex dilemma?
7.8 The Dilemma in Copi's Introduction to Logic says:
Complex dilemma: An argument consisting of (a) a disjunction, (b) two conditional premises linked by a conjunction, and (c) a conclusion
that ...
1
vote
0
answers
56
views
How should an argument containing an exceptive proposition be tested?
IX. Exceptive Propositions in 7.3 Translating Categorical Propositions into Standard Form in Copi's Introduction to Logic says:
Because exceptive propositions are not categorical propositions but
...
3
votes
1
answer
91
views
Word-Pairing Rhetorical Tactic
I am looking for a name referring to a rhetoric/propaganda tactic in which words are paired together to change perceptions? For example, if I said, "a controversial speaker is giving a lecture at ...
0
votes
1
answer
92
views
For what kind of P is "if P were the case, I would know that P" true?
Consider arguments of the following form for some proposition P:
If P were the case, I would know that P.
But I don't know that P.
Therefore, it is not the case that P.
I am wondering what kind of ...
3
votes
2
answers
158
views
Model of an argument
I have the thought that an informal argument is fundamentally about building a justification graph: a directed acyclic graph from premise propositions to intermediate and conclusion propositions, ...
3
votes
5
answers
2k
views
Is the Law of Excluded Middle an allowed argument in court?
Is the Law of Excluded Middle a valid deduction rule in court? If not, is it reasonable to say that all arguments in court must be "constructive in nature"?
As an example, consider this ...
1
vote
3
answers
127
views
Why is Occam’s razor faulted for being a heuristic when almost everything in philosophy is?
I am confused as to why any sort of discussion about Occam’s Razor, without fail, has the addendum mentioning how the tool doesn’t prove anything. But quite literally, unless something is logically ...
2
votes
2
answers
90
views
Is the argument by analogy logically consistent?
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/other-minds/#ArguAnal
I'm a bit confused by the criticism here.
That is, this argument has no problems with logical sequence and if the premises are correct, then ...
1
vote
6
answers
176
views
What is the fallacy called where "Nothing a liar said can be true?"
What is the fallacy called where "Nothing a liar said can be true" (i.e., "false in most things, false in everything")?
For example, consider that 99% of something someone said is ...
2
votes
3
answers
88
views
Type of false reasoning?
I don't have extensive background in philosophy but I try to outline my question clearly.
I am arguing with a person who always uses the same logic.
We have an outcome X such a medical disease ...
0
votes
0
answers
64
views
Is this argument about computers and consciousness logically valid?
Assume 1) You can make a conscious agent consisting of a robot controlled by some computer; 2) There are no zombies 3) You replace the computer by a chinese-like room version that behaves identically.
...
4
votes
2
answers
79
views
If moral statements aren't supposed to be reports of objective facts, does the practice of "fallacy checking" apply to moral arguments?
Maybe this is just a case of Jörgensen’s dilemma, but so I was reading the SEP article about feminist perspectives on argumentation, more specifically this passage:
The difficulty some philosophers ...
4
votes
3
answers
897
views
How did Nietzsche prove his will to power?
Was Nietzsche right about the will to power? Specifically, did he (or any of his interpreters) prove (let's take Kant's system as a cut off for 'proof') that the will to power, either individually or ...
7
votes
11
answers
1k
views
If we can't be 100% sure of anything, then we have to believe everything with a grain of salt?
If we can't be 100% sure of anything, then we should trust everything with mistrust and suspicion?
For example, the existence of other minds, the existence of the outside world, etc. is currently ...
2
votes
2
answers
170
views
What does the IBE argument (the best explanation argument) look like in favor of the existence of other minds?
I have read several versions of the IBE argument for the existence of other minds.
But I got a little confused.
Now I'm not sure I know what it should sound like.
How should the IBE argument (argument ...
1
vote
2
answers
106
views
Help to understand the use of arguments
If the arguments have the same conclusions, but the premises in one argument contradict the premises in another argument, then these arguments cannot be used together. I am right?
For example I have ...
2
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Logical Analysis of Argument
Andrew: I think this country needs more scientists.
Britney: But if everyone were scientists, then we won't have any artists! And without artists, we might as well all be robots.
Is Britney's argument ...
0
votes
1
answer
64
views
Can I use multiple justifications for believing in the existence of other minds?
Can I use multiple justifications for believing in the existence of other minds?
There are several good justifications for our belief in the existence of other minds.
Theory of mind, which is part of ...
1
vote
2
answers
213
views
Objection to Famine, Affluence and Morality
If you can prevent something bad from happening at the cost of something less bad, you ought to do it.
The second principle, as quoted above, is the link between the seemingly obvious claim that:
...
14
votes
3
answers
2k
views
What is this "going to the other extreme to make it look stupid to prove something"?
I don't know why I see this so often.
When I say, it may not be good to sell 35 years of your life to the corporate world in a stressful way being golden handcuffed by a high salary or stock, somebody ...
6
votes
7
answers
3k
views
What are philosophical arguments for the position that Intelligent Design is nothing but "Creationism in disguise"?
I would like to start this question quoting one of the comments to this answer to the question Does Intelligent Design (ID) entail an infinite regress of designers, and if so, is that problematic?.
...
2
votes
1
answer
71
views
Does an argument require an explicit statement of conclusion?
The book I'm reading Critical Thinking by Brooke Noel Moore, Richard Parker says that the following is an argument.
John Montgomery has been the Eastern Baseball League’s best closer this
season. ...
0
votes
0
answers
54
views
Explain how the Phenomenal Conservatism and Common Sense Privilege arguments works to justify belief in other minds
Please explain how the Phenomenal Conservatism and Common Sense Privilege argument works to justify belief in other minds.
Here it is written that it is used to justify belief in other minds, but I ...
2
votes
4
answers
108
views
Location of the sky (universe) according to Aristotle
Aristotle wrote in his Physics:
The earth is in the water, the water is in the air, the air is in the
ether, the ether is in the sky, and the sky is no longer in anything
else.
Do you agree with ...
1
vote
2
answers
199
views
If an argument cannot be known as sound, can it still be claimed as sound?
I have read the the criteria to determine if an argument is sound is if its claim is valid and its premises are true.
However, what if no one can know whether or not an argument is sound because no ...
1
vote
0
answers
34
views
what do you call a logical argument between 2 people who hav personal grudges? Its opposite of Ad Hominem bt not Inverse Ad Hominem. what's it called?
If A and B already have personal grudges but keep that aside, they are discussing a subject and a conflict erupts argument. Their points are based on the subject only and nothing personal but the heat ...
0
votes
0
answers
35
views
How does pluralism about doxastic logic work?
If person M has a concept of belief, and a logic for that concept, B1, but some other person N has concept B2, with different inference rules over the operator, then on the first-order level, does M ...
0
votes
1
answer
56
views
What is (or should be) the logical structure of a demarcation argument?
I am working on a scholarly article that attempts to define "theory" in my scholarly field, which is a social science. (My field is information systems, mainly a hybrid between information ...
-1
votes
1
answer
30
views
Analytically, what is the difference between the essay questions: "What does it mean to argue that X?", and "Is it the case that X?"
I'm trying to work out the best way to approach this (3rd year undergraduate) essay titled in the form "What does it mean to argue that X?", and I'm having difficulty expressing a case for ...