Questions tagged [being]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
-1
votes
1answer
84 views

((P=P)=(-P=-P)) -> negation of (P or -P)

True or False and why? Forgive the lack of clearer notation, this was typed on an ipad. P equals P is equivalent to -P equals -P, which is further equivalent to P = -P considering both P and - P ...
2
votes
1answer
85 views

Is Hegel's Logic an Ontology?

Stephen Houlgate, in his book The Beginning of Hegel's Logic, puts forward the argument that Hegel's Logic is to be seen as an ontology. But is this view convincing? I'll try my best to reconstruct ...
1
vote
0answers
75 views

Do qualia have Being?

Do qualia have Being? I'm unsure what 'Being' means, but take it that it has something to do with red always being red, self sameness or identity. If qualia do have Being, is that itself like ...
2
votes
2answers
109 views

Must an analysis of Being precede the positive sciences?

In the first few pages of Being and Time Heidegger writes: such an inquiry [into foundations]... still needs a guideline... it remains naive and opaque if... it leaves the meaning of being in ...
3
votes
0answers
46 views

Understanding 'existence' and 'being' in debates about ordinary objects

Quine has brought forward his definition of existence: 'To be is to be the value of a bound variable.' But has also taught us that the sciences ultimately determine what actually exists contrary to ...
2
votes
1answer
216 views

What were Plato's views on substance?

Forms are Plato’s substances, for everything derives its existence from Forms. In this sense of ‘substance’ any realist philosophical system acknowledges the existence of substances. Probably the ...
2
votes
0answers
190 views

Does ontology study “being qua being”?

May I say that ontology studies "being qua being", while the sciences study "entity qua entity" ? I ask this because I don't understand how ontology could study the "entity qua entity", taking into ...
0
votes
0answers
61 views

Does anyone say that Being is a primitive, unanalyzable, term?

Does anyone say that Being is a primitive, unanalyzable, term? That probably would make Being and Time the greatest work of nonsense of all time. I certainly feel able to imagine that Being is ...
3
votes
5answers
395 views

Why must the first mover be unmovable?

In the first way of Aquinas it is proved that there exists an unmoved mover (or unchanged changer or even better, actualizer which was not actualized). It is often claimed that God is pure act without ...
3
votes
3answers
168 views

Can potentiality be used to dispel Parmenides's monism?

Can we say that beings are different precisely because this being has this potencies and that being has that potencies? Is the (only) thing differentiating two different things their set of potencies? ...
2
votes
1answer
120 views

What are the best arguments for the defense of the “principle of motion”?

How would someone (I would love to hear how Aquinas and/or Aristotle would) defend the principle of motion (that is, whatever is changed is changed by another or only actual being can actualize ...
6
votes
2answers
382 views

Book on Meinong's theory of objects

Could anyone please recommend a book to begin to learn about Meinong's theory of objects and "Meinong's Jungle". I thought a good one might be "Meinong's Theory of Objects and Values" by Findlay (1963)...
1
vote
1answer
202 views

Could “I” become consciousness as someone else in the future?

I want to immediately dismiss any idea of soul or spiritual component of human being and I accept that death is nothingness (end) when it comes to my question. No rebirth, reincarnation etc. But ...
2
votes
1answer
38 views

The preconditions of being

Can you tell who discussed the precondition of being? Also, when I was at college, a long time ago, I remember studying only one (British, I think) philosopher tackling that issue, and he listed ...
3
votes
4answers
584 views

Is being something and not any other thing a necessary and sufficient condition of existence?

Is being something and not any other thing a necessary and (the only) sufficient condition of existence? I'm working on something close to the idea of Apoha, but in an ontological sense. I suppose ...
6
votes
1answer
71 views

The grades of being

I read once that Indian philosophy considers four levels of existence: being being and not being not being and being not being I thought this fascinating and more realistic than Western ...
2
votes
1answer
60 views

What are the third and fourth ways in which William Charlton says “being” is used in Aristotle?

I'm reading William Charlton's commentary on Aristotle's Physics I and II, and I am having trouble with the following: Aristotle recognizes four main "ways in which a thing might be said" i.e. ...
7
votes
9answers
314 views

How does being come into being? How does existence come into existence?

So, the universe was created by the big bang. And the big bang was created by some stringy things, or branes or whatever. But what created those strings? And what created the thing that created them? ...
8
votes
4answers
427 views

How could being follow action?

Some philosophers have denied the philosophical axiom "Agere sequitur esse"* ("'To act' follows from 'to be'"). What reasons do they give for thinking that action precedes (logically? ontologically? ...