Questions tagged [bertrand-russell]
Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) was a British philosopher and logician who is regarded as one of the founders of analytic philosophy and modern logic.
154
questions
2
votes
0
answers
39
views
Where do presuppositions fit into Grice's theory of meaning?
To clarify, by "Grice's theory of meaning" I am referring to the view that the informational content or meaning of an utterance is made up of three components:
what is said - the actual ...
- 481
0
votes
1
answer
43
views
formalization: definite description (narrow reading)
I am not sure which formalization is right [1] or [2]:
'The teacher of Plato does not exist.'
[1] ∃x(Tx,p ∧ ∀y[Ty,p → y=x] ∧ ¬∃y[y = x])
[2] ∃x(Tx,p ∧ ∀y[Ty,p → y=x] ∧ ¬∃z[z = x])
Is it possible to ...
- 3
3
votes
9
answers
3k
views
What is the burden of proof? Has this principle ever been challenged?
I have been surprised to find that some people doubt this principle. Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat - the burden of proof lies with the speaker, not with the one who negates. I ...
- 1,942
-2
votes
2
answers
125
views
Must all sentences be true or false?
Suppose there is a entity with which you can write down a self-contradictory sentence.Does the entity still exist?For example you know Russell's paradox?There is someone who says:"I always lie&...
- 99
0
votes
1
answer
89
views
Does matter have an intrinsic nature?
Russell posits that matter has an intrinsic as well as an extrinsic nature. There is being as well as doing. He says "We know nothing about the intrinsic quality of physical events except when ...
- 1,942
2
votes
0
answers
65
views
Is there a couniversal solution to the predicate-theoretic version of Russell's paradox?
In set theory, let us call a solution to the problem of universal-sets-or-proper-classes a couniversal solution when it involves proposing the following:
∃U∀x((x ≠ U) ⟺ (x ∈ U))
This means that U is ...
- 12.5k
0
votes
0
answers
37
views
Does Russell's objection to Meinongianism apply whenever we take the meta-version of an existence-predicate distinction?
The point of departure:
A third problem, one of Russell’s objections to Meinongianism (see [Russell 1905a, 1907]), turns on the fact that existence is, on Meinongianism, a property and hence figures ...
- 12.5k
0
votes
0
answers
34
views
Argumentation by Russel as to what constitutes an a priori knowable proposition
In the Problems of Philosophy, chapter 10: ON OUR KNOWLEDGE OF UNIVERSALS (p.57 in my book), Russel writes the following:
The thing that seemed mysterious, when we formerly considered such knowledge, ...
1
vote
1
answer
88
views
Bertrand Russell describes Aristotle
"The form of a thing, we are told, is its essence and primary substance. Forms are substantial, although universals are not. When a man makes a brazen sphere, both the matter and the form already ...
- 11
1
vote
0
answers
65
views
What were Bertrand Russell's later views on quantum mechanics?
Russell touched on QM a bit in The Analysis of Matter, which was the same year as the Fifth Solvay Conference. I am sure he must have thought very deeply about the implications of the quantum theory, ...
- 11
0
votes
0
answers
38
views
For what theories of meaning are ambiguous referents problematic?
Suppose I am talking to an English friend of mine and I say, "Boston is in Massachusetts." Since I am referring to the American city, I consider this sentence to be true. My friend evaluates ...
-1
votes
3
answers
112
views
Why did it take 3000 years for theories of mathematical foundations to emerge? [closed]
Humans have been doing mathematics for at least 3000 years. In ancient Egypt they did some advanced trigonometry and number theory. Mathematics is thousands of years old, but for some reason it was ...
- 1,255
0
votes
1
answer
52
views
Russell and consequentialism
Bertrand Russell is a consequentialist (see here [1] and here [2]: “ Russell, like Moore was what is nowadays known as a consequentialist. He believed that the rightness or otherwise of an act is “in ...
- 1,376
9
votes
7
answers
3k
views
What did Russell mean when he wrote that the null-class, the class having no members, did not exist?
I am not quite sure I interpret the following sentence correctly in Bertrand Russell's paper on existential import:
and among classes there is just one which does not exist, namely, the class having ...
- 6,241
1
vote
4
answers
311
views
What is a convincing explanation of how Russell's "golden mountains" argument is logically fallacious?
Here is the now famous passage in his book on Western philosophy where Bertrand Russell explains why Aristotle's position that the universal affirmative "All Greeks are men" implies the ...
- 6,241
1
vote
2
answers
70
views
Do these expressions denote?
Say I have a sentence like:
'If I had a dog, I would walk it'
What is the role of 'a dog' and 'it', from reading about indefinite descriptions, the fact that I am discussing in general implies there ...
- 1,073
2
votes
1
answer
94
views
Russell - Concepts vs Denotation
I understand why definite descriptions like 'The King of England' are denoting phrases, but I am confused by differing between concepts and what they 'denote'.
In Principles of Mathematics:
A concept ...
- 1,073
1
vote
3
answers
204
views
Do Universals Possess a Different Kind of Reality to Particulars?
I have a long interest in the 'problem of universals' and a conviction that some form of either Platonic or Aristotelian realism in respect of universals is correct. This extends to what is called '...
- 564
1
vote
1
answer
74
views
How many 'idols' did Francis Bacon identify?
The majority of references to Francis Bacon's 'idols' refer to 4 distinct ones but some sources have otherwise. There is a supposed 5th, that is 'idols of the schools'. Which is correct? Did Bacon ...
- 11
2
votes
0
answers
89
views
Seeking a quote of Russell on what he could conceive or discuss
At some point someone asked Bertrand Russell about formal logical language without distinctions of type. (I think it might have been Quine, who was developing for example kinds of algebraic logic ...
- 1,240
2
votes
1
answer
76
views
Source of a Russell quote about difficulties in his work
Some years ago I read somewhere a memoir by Bertrand Russell. He wrote about the difficulties he encountered in writing Principia Mathematica (or trying to solve the paradox that bears his name). He ...
- 123
10
votes
5
answers
2k
views
Why was Russell discontent with Wittgenstein's view on "logic as tautologies"?
While reading Logicomix, I came across a scene that I don't quite understand.
Russell: ...Logicians are creating elaborate ways to "say the same things in different words"...this "...
- 363
0
votes
0
answers
40
views
Is there a quantitative measure for a philosopher's skill?
Obviously, the property you should be interested in here is fame.
Below a ranking of the philosophers included in Leiter's list, sorted
by fame (measured in dBHa, the international logarithmic unit of ...
user56815
1
vote
3
answers
87
views
Why Can't We Replace Names with Descriptions?
If the descriptivist theory says that the sense of a name is a description, then why do the cognitive values of the two differ? i.e. One could believe the first, but not the second.
Superman is ...
- 485
1
vote
0
answers
53
views
what is Russell's Neutral Monism and how does it differ from Spinoza's Substance Monism?
I have studied Spinoza, so you don't need to explain that part.
For some reason, explanations of Russell on the internet don't get into my head, that's why I've come here.
0
votes
0
answers
56
views
How does the view "without mathematics no true wisdom is possible" imply an oligarchy? (History of Western Philosophy)
In his chapter on Plato, Russell says "He was sufficiently Pythagorean to think that without mathematics no true wisdom is possible. This implies an oligarchy." and I can't follow the ...
- 1
2
votes
0
answers
319
views
Question about Russell's distinction between knowledge of things and knowledge of truths in 'The Problems of Philosophy'
In his book, Russell distinguishes several types of knowledge. He first distinguishes knowledge of truths, and of things.
"the sense in which what we know is true (...) i.e. to what are called ...
- 363
5
votes
1
answer
96
views
Is Russell's "(im)predicativity" terminology related to (or even derived from) Kant's "existence is not a predicate" argument?
I'm a mathematician who's generally ignorant of philosophy, so forgive me if my question is a bit sloppy. I'm really trying to ask about a historical connection/context.
I recently encountered the ...
- 153
0
votes
0
answers
90
views
Did Bertrand Russell foresee, in 1943, the 21st century’s propensity to assign factuality to whatever information one finds most comfortable?
I recently read a short paragraph in Russell’s “History of Western Philosophy” which stunned me—it was the shock of recognition—to the extent that I put down the book and stared into space for a good ...
- 109
3
votes
1
answer
289
views
How may the terms "a priori" and "a posteriori" be used in(side) of mathematics?
This question seems either trivial or somewhat vague; let me explain further.
I apologize if I am misunderstanding the concepts or missing the point entirely; I am a mathematics student and I ...
- 31
0
votes
0
answers
213
views
What, if anything, has post-positivism left standing as the legacy of Frege’s Begriffsschriftis, Russel’s Principia, and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus
The goal of both Russel’s Principia (1910) and Frege’s Begriffsschriftis (1879) ["a formula language, modeled on that of arithmetic, for pure thought."] was essentially to defend the ...
- 1,875
0
votes
2
answers
66
views
How do I symbolise this statement with a definite description in first order logic?
"If there is exactly one present King of France, then the present King of France is a present King of France"
The part I am confused about is the consequent of the conditional which equals ...
0
votes
0
answers
60
views
Confidence margin for logical verification
I'm starting to read Wittgenstein and I keep circling around a problem, which I'll lay out with the following ideas:
a. Logical space is the totality of external reality.
b. A proposition is logical ...
- 101
0
votes
0
answers
97
views
Did Bertrand Russell mock Christians for considering humanity important?
(I am aware this question is not a philosophy question per se, but there are possibly many people here who are likely to be familiar with Bertrand Russell's writings.)
Bertrand Russell's daughter, ...
- 443
0
votes
2
answers
178
views
Formal Proof and Russell's paradox?
I am a little thrown off with this.
Can we express Russell’s paradox as "A dog chases all and only those dogs that don’t chase themselves"?
What is a formal proof showing that it is ...
- 9
2
votes
0
answers
80
views
How does Davidson's Slingshot argument escape Russell's Theory of Definite Descriptions?
Hi I am trying to understand Davidson's Slingshot argument. Apparently it is said that Russell's Theory of Definite Descriptions does not face the problem that Davidson highlights.
For instance, if we ...
0
votes
1
answer
524
views
How shall I understand Wittgenstein's comment on Russell's work?
Ludwig Wittgenstein said
Russell’s books should be bound in two colours…those dealing with mathematical logic in red – and all students of philosophy should read them; those dealing with ethics and ...
- 479
0
votes
1
answer
84
views
Does Russell state that atoms are neither mental nor physical?
In the context of Russell's philosophy, are atoms neither mental nor physical?
I think yes. In the context of neutral monism, he seems to offer the above view by saying that there is a single material ...
- 267
1
vote
1
answer
960
views
Difference between Frege and Russell on Definite Descriptions?
I'm relatively new to philosophy and I'm starting out with the 'staple' philosophers - namely Frege and Russell. I've read Frege's "Sense and Reference" and Russell's "On Denoting."
One thing I have ...
- 11
2
votes
1
answer
152
views
Logical Atomism and Simple Particulars
I read a bit of logical atomism by Russell, but would appreciate if someone explains with examples of what is meant by it. For example, it says that "[a]ccording to logical atomism, all truths ...
- 21
2
votes
1
answer
519
views
How did Bertrand Russell distinguish between being and existence?
In his book, "Principles of Mathematics", Russell makes the following claim:
Being is that which belongs to every conceivable term, to every possible object, of thought-in short to everything that ...
- 61
0
votes
1
answer
148
views
Russell on what philosophy is
Somewhere, Bertrand Russell wrote something like philosophy argues from premises so obvious no one could doubt them, to conclusions no one would believe if they had not seen the argument. Can anyone ...
- 1,240
8
votes
1
answer
2k
views
What sentence convinced Russell that Wittgenstein was not a "complete idiot"?
On several occasions I've come across Russell's account of his decision that Wittgenstein was not a "complete idiot", but I've never been able to figure out what Wittgenstein wrote to him or what that ...
- 668
1
vote
2
answers
115
views
Truth Value of Definite Descriptions
I'm currently studying definite descriptions in logic. My textbook postulates Bertrand Russell's view of definite descriptions, but I'm curious about other views as well (in the context of classical 2-...
- 297
2
votes
1
answer
203
views
Is civilization really a good thing? [closed]
According to Bertrand Russell
Change is one thing, progress is another. Change is scientific, progress is ethical; change is indubitable, whereas progress is a matter of controversy.
Sigmund Freud ...
- 443
0
votes
3
answers
295
views
Although Russell's paradox has the virtue of simplicity, is it a distraction from other paradoxes of naive set theory?
Given that Russell's paradox exhibits a contradiction in naive set theory, the interpretation of the binary relation "∈" called "membership" (where the expression "x ∈ m" is pronounced as "x is an ...
- 281
0
votes
2
answers
442
views
Was Bertrand Russell correct in characterising the United States as 'a Nazi State'? [closed]
In his book, War Crimes in Vietnam, published in 1967 Russell several times calls the United States a Nazi State:
The United States government is conducting a war of annihilation in the Vietnam. ...
4
votes
1
answer
192
views
Where does Bertrand Russell discuss mysticism?
G. E. M. Anscombe writes in An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus (1971, St Augustine's Press) the following about Wittgenstein's use of the concept of mysticism: (page 170)
But Wittgenstein ...
- 19.2k
3
votes
2
answers
3k
views
Source of a Russell quote about purpose and meaninglessness
The following quote is attributed to Bertrand Russell:
Unless you assume a God, the question of life’s purpose is meaningless.
The reference for the quote is:
Bertrand Russell, quoted in Rick ...
- 19.2k
1
vote
2
answers
162
views
What does Bertrand Russell mean by "analytic" in this context?
But, to my mind, a "necessary proposition" has got to be analytic. I don't see what else it can mean. And analytic propositions are always complex and logically somewhat late. "Irrational animals are ...
- 803