Skip to main content

Questions tagged [cosmological-argument]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
1 answer
44 views

In the Contingency argumemt it is referenced that alternative having things can not be necessary, whats the alternative in here can be considered as?

In the Argument of Contingency there is referenced that if something has alternatives, that thing can't be necessary because of it could be something different than what it is, so is this information ...
Hido's user avatar
  • 21
0 votes
0 answers
34 views

Can numbers be considered to have alternatives in terms of contingent contingency argument?

in the Argument of Contingency, alternatives are mentioned they bring a argument like if a thing has alternatives, it can't be necessary existent because if it could be different then it doesn't have ...
Hido's user avatar
  • 21
1 vote
1 answer
60 views

In the argument of Contingency(Leibnizian Cosmological Argument) can a necessary existent have alternatives? [closed]

Hello I've got a question about Leibnizian Cosmological Argument, In the argument can a necessary existent have alternatives? Why yes and why not? And are numbers considered as alternatives to each ...
Hido's user avatar
  • 21
0 votes
3 answers
91 views

Why is it invalid to conclude from ‘Some A is B’ and ‘One A does not differ the least bit from another’ that ‘Every A is B’?

I am reading a paper¹ which explains criticism of Kant’s putative argument that the cosmological argument reduces to the ontological one. To show that, a syllogism of this form is needed: (Major) The ...
TempLogicKant's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
125 views

How could we get over a seeming contradiction in first cause causality without jumping to anything impossible?

This post is showing a contradiction in the existence of a first cause, meaning maybe it's not possible for it to exist. You might not get this immediately so look at the second paragraph and read ...
someinpp's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
63 views

Explaining the existence vs. explaining the nonexistence of necessary beings

I understand that I am waiving issues like the absolute/relative simplicity/complexity distinction, the difference between the logic of existence and the logic of nonexistence per se, etc., so I ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
2 votes
4 answers
1k views

What precisely are brute contingent facts?

In my philosophical discourses typically relating to cosmological arguments, I've been astounded by brute facts, and how they relate to contingency and necessity. My reflections can be adduced by a ...
Khasim Amedu's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
158 views

How sound is the Avicennian argument from Contingency?

There are numerous variations of the argument from contingency that that are postulated in apologetics and philosophical speculation, however I stumbled upon an argument that is ascribed to my ...
Khasim Amedu's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
109 views

If there is no more gap, is the existence of God the logical conclusion?

The god of the gaps is used to fill the last gap in front of a fundamental explanation of the physical world. Fundamental physical constants, like the masses of the elementary particle families (or ...
Pathfinder's user avatar
3 votes
5 answers
780 views

An argument against brute physical facts

I would like to know what anybody thinks of the following argument against brute physical facts, such as the idea that the material universe as a whole is a brute fact. A physical fact is taken to ...
Mark's user avatar
  • 377
0 votes
1 answer
69 views

The resemblance of 'being that exists' with the 'element' in the definition of a set

What exactly is the meaning of the term 'being that exists' which is associated with the argument from contingency. Can I equate this term with an abstract object (SEP) such as 'element' in the ...
RIYASUDHEEN T. K's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
142 views

Is there a logical reason to default to a certain type of first cause?

While there are some exceptions, physics generally holds that the universe has a beginning. Assuming that there is a first cause of the universe, what are the logical based reasons for preferring ...
Joseph Hirsch's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
296 views

How do we know things don't come into existence Ex Nihilo on their own?

The Kalam Cosmological Argument relies on the idea that things don't just pop into existence from nothing, or they don't come into existence Ex Nihilo. However, it seems that it justifies this based ...
Luke Hill's user avatar
  • 321
-1 votes
2 answers
136 views

Why is this argument supposedly improved?

Hello to all philosophers! A while ago my professor was going through the First Cause Argument and formatted it as such: Everything has a cause. The chain of causes cannot reach back indefinitely; ...
Abraham's user avatar
  • 493
0 votes
1 answer
166 views

The Kalam Cosmological Argument

I have recently watched a discussion between William Lane Craig and the CosmicSkeptic about the Kalam, and it gave me this idea, and I doubt I'm the first to have it but what if causality is in itself ...
Jordan23's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
229 views

Generating the simplest sort of Cosmological Argument

First, I am not a philosopher, but rather an applied mathematician. However, the Cosmological Argument has always intrigued me. At times I feel that all attempts are necessarily hopeless, at other ...
Mark's user avatar
  • 377
1 vote
1 answer
191 views

Having S5 system Why we need to use WPSR in Gale Pruss New cosmological arguement?

As you know Gale_ Pruss improved The cosmological argument using WPSR instead of Strong PSR. They in their 1999 article said if it be possibly that there be a God who freely created the world using ...
MHghasemi's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
115 views

Some questions about the cosmological argument given by Samuel Clarke

The exercise I am doing is as follows: The following are my questions: Why the exercise says that Samuel Clarke's argument "allow for the possibility of causal chains with no beginning"? ...
CharlieLei's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
647 views

Does St. Thomas Aquinas' cosmological argument from contingency assume that an infinite regress of contingent things is impossible?

The Third Way: Argument from Possibility and Necessity (Reductio argument) We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, that come into being and go out of being i.e., ...
Jonah Pate's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
570 views

A small reformulation of the Cosmological Argument

I am sure the cosmological argument has been raised here by people like me who know nothing about philosophy numerous times before on this board. But I'm wondering if a slightly different approach can ...
Mark's user avatar
  • 377
4 votes
6 answers
344 views

Are all explanations either personal or scientific?

In A New Cosmological Argument, Richard Gale and Alexander Pruss offer up a cosmological argument for a personal God, from the weak principle of sufficient reason (among other premises, but the WPSR ...
Adam Sharpe's user avatar
  • 3,844
24 votes
13 answers
5k views

If the universe has a beginning does that prove God exists?

It is curious to note that a eminent Physicist like Stephen Hawking thinks the universe has a beginning. This has some rather startling Religious implications You can find the link here: http://www....
user avatar