Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
2 answers
555 views

Would Pascal's Wager hold validity if doxastic involuntarism were true?

According to Wikipedia, Pascal's wager is defined as follows: The wager uses the following logic (excerpts from Pensées, part III, §233): God is, or God is not. Reason cannot decide between the two ...
user80226's user avatar
  • 4,100
12 votes
11 answers
3k views

Can we choose to believe in God?

Philosophically, arguments both for and against the existence of God can be found. Alex O'Connor and Joe Schmid have compiled the following: Arguments For: The Contingency Argument The Kalam ...
user80226's user avatar
  • 4,100
5 votes
7 answers
1k views

Is Blaise Pascal's approach to "curing unbelief" in the proposition that God exists philosophically sound?

Hence it comes that, if there are as many risks on one side as on the other, the course is to play even; and then the certainty of the stake is equal to the uncertainty of the gain, so far is it from ...
user avatar
1 vote
4 answers
177 views

Can a reliabilist have a reliably justified belief in God?

Reliabilism is defined by several sources as follows: Reliabilism is an approach to the nature of knowledge and of justified belief. Reliabilism about justification, in its simplest form, says that a ...
user avatar
2 votes
6 answers
645 views

Can God make the belief in His own existence justified (if He exists)?

In a hypothetical scenario in which God exists, would God be able to make the belief in His existence justified for humans? If so, how? What would God need to do to accomplish that goal? If not, does ...
user avatar
4 votes
4 answers
421 views

Is it a contradiction to believe God is both transcendent and omnipresent?

From a classical theistic perspective, God both transcends time and space, yet is also present everywhere. But how can God be both outside time and space and yet be present everywhere?
Bob's user avatar
  • 383