Questions tagged [foundations-of-mathematics]
The foundations-of-mathematics tag has no usage guidance.
78
questions
7
votes
5
answers
2k
views
Is mathematics analytic or synthetic?
This question is related to another question I posted but I think it requires its own treatment since of the already wide scope of the other question i.e. Is the classical theory of concepts ...
2
votes
4
answers
170
views
Is mathematics based on formal logic, or vice versa?
Math is obviously based on logic in a heirarchical sense, but what about the historical sense? Is there any historical evidence of a "transition" from first order logic to mathematics? All ...
3
votes
3
answers
163
views
Is the answer to whether math is discovered or invented related to theism?
I'm not asking whether mathematics is discovered or invented, rather whether being theist implies/strengthens/related to the view that it is discovered, and vice versa.
For example I came across an ...
3
votes
2
answers
122
views
Has anyone discussed the analytic vs synthetic in algebra?
Let's go back to the original meanings of addition and multiplication back in ancient Sumer when arithmetic was primarily used as a tool in the trade of sheep and beer. Addition meant something like ...
1
vote
2
answers
130
views
Is modern mathematics scholasticism?
I have thought a lot a about mathematics and it's foundations. There have been several attempts to give it a solid foundation, and they all failed. Frege / Russell logical atomist approach failed, ...
-1
votes
3
answers
112
views
Why did it take 3000 years for theories of mathematical foundations to emerge? [closed]
Humans have been doing mathematics for at least 3000 years. In ancient Egypt they did some advanced trigonometry and number theory. Mathematics is thousands of years old, but for some reason it was ...
2
votes
1
answer
58
views
Is there a historically plausible account of the real numbers?
Frege's ill-fated program to define the natural numbers in terms of abstraction was intended as a genuine account of what natural numbers are, not just a way of encoding numbers in set theory like ...
2
votes
1
answer
110
views
Multigraphs, hypergraphs, and the epistemic regress
Some definitions (from what I can tell):
A multigraph is a graph where a node can connect via multiple edges.
A hypergraph is a graph where a single edge can connect more than two nodes. ...
1
vote
0
answers
45
views
How would we define a topos between Classical Logic and Paraconsistent Logic, and determine what the homomorphism between them would be? [closed]
How would we define a topos between Classical Logic and Paraconsistent Logic, and determine what the homomorphism between them would be? I learned that topoi can't be used for philosophical ideas, but ...
3
votes
3
answers
84
views
Descartes' foundationalism [closed]
Is the cogito an axiom from which we can reason axioms of mathematics? Was Descartes' aim to make mathematics (and other fields of knowledge) reducible to the cogito?
1
vote
1
answer
83
views
Is the response (in the mathematics community) to Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, evidence for social constructivism about math?
Wiles' proof initially involved reference to functional equivalents of inaccessible cardinals (here, Grothendieck universes). Rather than take this as evidence for the meaningfulness and usefulness of ...
0
votes
0
answers
52
views
Is category theory an example of foundherentism?
After reading this essay about the history of type theory, I have refined my assessment of the set- vs. type-theory question in two ways. More similarly to what I was thinking before, I still ground ...
2
votes
1
answer
130
views
Why don't formalized proofs make formalism true?
All mathematicians are familiar with the (extremely plausible) fact that any ordinary mathematical proof can be formalized inside some foundational theory, e.g., ZFC.
Why doesn't this imply that ...
6
votes
7
answers
3k
views
Is mathematical creativity the same as artistic creativity?
Do philosophers distinguish between mathematical creativity, and the broader artistic creativity? If so, what are the differences between these two?
A lot of people seem to treat IQ as something ...
2
votes
1
answer
153
views
Does every mathematical question have an unambiguous answer?
Does every mathematical question have an unambiguous answer?
For example, suppose I were to assert "In the decimal expansion of pi, does there occur in at least one location a billion 1's in a ...
0
votes
1
answer
90
views
How do we determine if a statement can't be proved by mathematics alone?
How do we determine if a statement can't be proved by mathematics alone? It seems mathematics can only prove something that can be defined purely in mathematics terms, but can't prove simple ...
-2
votes
1
answer
118
views
Why can't mathematics prove that Tic-tac-toe is a simple game? [closed]
Why can't mathematics prove that Tic-tac-toe is a simple game? Tell me if I am wrong, but we can prove that chess is less complex than tic-tac-toe, by counting the number of actions possible if we ...
2
votes
2
answers
168
views
Why can Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem be proven?
Preliminaries:
The way I understand it, Gödel took Russel's and Whitehead's Principia Mathematica (PM) and mapped strings of symbols from PM onto the integers, their Gödel numbers.
He then constructed,...
-2
votes
6
answers
295
views
Why do people still use classical logic? [closed]
It seems to me very crazy that mathematicians reactions to Godël incompleteness theorem have been mostly to agree that there are statements of the language which can neither be proved nor disproved ...
2
votes
3
answers
175
views
I am looking for some ternary logic with values True/False/Absurd
I am looking for some alternative logic where a sentence p could not only be true or false but also absurd, which is different of false in such a logic.
I see that there is some content about three ...
14
votes
7
answers
9k
views
Why do universities not teach constructive mathematics to CS undergraduates?
I had a conversation with a user on the Internet. And it did indeed wake my interest regarding something that I had also been asking myself long ago. Why do so many universities still teach beginners ...
2
votes
2
answers
152
views
Per Mathematical Structuralism, can a pure mathematical theory have semantics that is not closed on isomorphism?
This question is the philosophical side of a question that I've recently posted to MathOverflow. Here, I'm specifically asking about the output of Mathematical Structuralism on that question that I'll ...
1
vote
1
answer
190
views
Do any philosophers say surreal numbers are reason to doubt platonism?
Not trying to be inflammatory at all, this is a genuine (maybe dumb) question.
Especially in regards to the genesis of the surreals, which was Conway thinking about Go endgames. They seem among the ...
0
votes
0
answers
46
views
Realism as necessary for impredicative mathematics to avoid viscous circle, but not really?
Here is an quote from Godel from Shapiro’s Thinking About Mathematics:
“…the vicious circle…applies only if the entities are constructed by ourselves. In this case, there must clearly exist a ...
0
votes
0
answers
188
views
What is mathematical analysis?
Hilbert's aim to reduce all mathematics to finite logical system was shown impossible by Goedel. He did mathematical analysis of logic itself (Goedel numbering). Turing defined algorithms, and ...
1
vote
0
answers
146
views
Two questions about mathematical platonism
Any set, number, shape, definition, axiom, etc we write down or think about is not the ideal platonic version. But surely the mathematical platonist thinks humans are closer to that unreachable goal ...
1
vote
0
answers
72
views
Is there a naturalized intuitionist mathematics? Is it Kantian?
I have in mind an interpretation of mathematics as intuitionalism, where intuitions are subjective (built from personal experience), but subjective experience is ultimately explained “objectively” a ...
13
votes
7
answers
5k
views
In simple terms, what is the difference between logic in mathematics and philosophy?
I want to understand the difference between mathematical and philosophical logic. I actually thought they were the same till I read this post. Concisely speaking, what is the difference between how a ...
5
votes
8
answers
1k
views
Does Münchausen's trilemma apply to mathematics?
I'm a mathematician/statistician, and I've been recently reading about epistemology and philosophy of science in my particular field of study.
In statistics, there is a deep concern for the objective ...
3
votes
2
answers
545
views
Set theory with full comprehension
A few years ago I was reading an entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy related to set theory and I stumbled across a statement along these lines:
There is a set theory where full ...
0
votes
3
answers
205
views
Why do mathematical platonists believe in the abstract when math clearly comes from FOL, a non-abstract?
To assure ourselves first order logic is as free of paradox, errors, and impermanence, mathematicians and logicians "grounded" math in a language/system everyone can agree upon. Here is a ...
0
votes
1
answer
174
views
How can you analogize mathematical induction to dominoes falling, if some domino can fail to topple?
This analogy doesn't convince me, because what if some domino (after b, the base case) fails to topple? In real life, a domino can remain standing upright if it got placed too far apart from the ...
0
votes
0
answers
47
views
Mathematical "forms" as a relation of varying arity
This might be more a MathSE question, but on the other hand, it would involve a peculiar reimagining of the relation between set theory and type theory, so I'll try it out here.
OK, so earlier I ...
9
votes
3
answers
4k
views
Set theory vs. type theory vs. category theory
IIRC, in the univalent-foundations program (per Voevodsky), category theory is represented as a possible sort of evolution or new wave of type theory. Maybe my memory is off, but anyway, in nlab they ...
1
vote
0
answers
113
views
How do logicians think of strength of proof systems?
I want to understand how logicians reason about strengths of proof systems and argue relative strengths of proof systems. I want to appreciate the validity of the reasoning by which we establish ...
4
votes
2
answers
728
views
Do Godel's incompleteness theorems create a contradiction/paradox?
I have seen Godel's theorems presented as a paradox. However, I was only able to infer it's supposed to be one because it proves mathematics to be incapable to be consistent AND complete at the same ...
0
votes
3
answers
170
views
Working of Mathematical Induction
I am aware of what proof by Mathematical Induction is. I have also used it in numerous proofs. However, I don't understand formal correctness/validity of the method down to the level of Peano Axioms. ...
0
votes
5
answers
236
views
Is there any conflict with Holism and equals and plus signs of mathematics?
Edit - better phrasing/summary:
Maybe this phrasing helps "the same object expressed in different ways". That's one meaning behind 'equals'. 10 = 1+...4 --> 10 really is 1+...4. So if ...
0
votes
1
answer
114
views
Can Mathematics be a tool to analyse immaterial existences
Doubt: Can we say that Mathematical thoughts (arguments) can be independent of physical (Time-space continuum or material) world since it is an abstract science. In other words can Mathematics be a ...
3
votes
3
answers
349
views
How do we arrive at stronger theories in mathematics/logic?
A reasonable aim of formal mathematics/logic is to build systems which can "interpret" many things. As an example, ZFC can interpret a number of things. Incompleteness Theorems provide us ...
7
votes
4
answers
779
views
If most numbers are uncomputable, in what sense do they exist?
Since the set of computer programs is countable and the set of real numbers is uncountable, then it means most real numbers are incomputable. i.e. there does not exist an algorithm to compute their ...
1
vote
1
answer
91
views
Is there a weaker/general version of Incompleteness Theorem which holds for every formal axiomatic system?
Is there a general version of Godel's Incompleteness Theorem which holds for any formal axiomatic system (and not just those capable of modelling basic arithmetic)?
If no, is it absurd to ask why such ...
3
votes
5
answers
1k
views
Why can anything be discovered in mathematics at all?
Imagine a Perfect Mathematician that has superhuman abilities -- if you give him or her a formal foundational system for mathematics like ZFC with all the underlying logical machinery, he or she is ...
-2
votes
4
answers
463
views
Why is the definition of the real numbers not contradictory? [closed]
I understand that a set whose members can, in principle, be enumerated (by having a formula) can be considered as a well-defined set. Therefore, set of all even numbers, multiples of 3, and so on ...
2
votes
2
answers
128
views
Inductive argument for Con(ZFC)
If you ask a mathematician, particularly a set theorist, about whether ZFC is consistent, they will answer that we can't know for sure because of Gödel's theorems. If you ask what evidence at all is ...
0
votes
1
answer
138
views
Is Constructivism (philosophy of mathematics) against classical logic?
Is Constructivism (philosophy of mathematics) against classical logic? I might be wrong, but mathematics' main branch of logic is based on classical logic, and I was wondering if Constructivism was ...
1
vote
0
answers
188
views
What is the current status of Foundation-of-Mathematics programmes?
I have been reading 'A Very Short Introduction to Mathematics' by Timothy Gowers and at one point he mentions that most of the mathematical proofs can be finally resolved to a set of logical ...
1
vote
0
answers
70
views
Is there some non-classical logic where the van der Waerden theorem does not apply?
The van der Waerden theorem is a theorem in the branch of mathematics called Ramsey theory which states that for any given positive integers r and k, there is some number N such that if the integers {...
0
votes
0
answers
82
views
What is the connection between Lawvere and Cantor?
Lawvere wrote in a couple papers that Cantors word “menge” which is usually understood as “set” is actually a cohesive type. And the “kardinale” is the abstraction from this by getting rid of the ...
-1
votes
1
answer
162
views
Books on Philosophy of Mathematics [duplicate]
I want to buy a philosophy of mathematics book. I have three options in mind: Philosophy of Mathematics by Øystein Linnebo, Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings by Paul Benacerraf, or
The ...