Questions tagged [kalam-cosmological-argument]

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
1 answer
137 views

Is the argument from freewill further supported by causal arguments

The argument from freewill is a paradox that can be loosely described as, if God is omniscient or all knowing then God subject's, man , cannot have freewill as the 'fate' or actions of man have been ...
8Mad0Manc8's user avatar
1 vote
5 answers
1k views

Explanation of the cause of the event of the beginning of time

Events in the natural world are determined to have temporal cause and a temporal effect. One temporal event is the cause of another temporal event which is the effect of that temporal cause and forms ...
8Mad0Manc8's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
42 views

Kant, Critique of Pure Reason : Cosmological proof

"Both the proofs [for the cosmological and ontological arguments] previously cited were attempted transcendentally, i.e., independently of empirical principles. For although the cosmological ...
Gerry's user avatar
  • 429
2 votes
3 answers
499 views

What is meant by "begin to exist" in the Kalam Cosmological argument

This question, tbc, is about the first three steps of the cosmological argument, because without those steps, the remainder of the argument just doesn't matter. As William Lane Craig formulates the ...
philosodad's user avatar
  • 3,296
0 votes
1 answer
68 views

The resemblance of 'being that exists' with the 'element' in the definition of a set

What exactly is the meaning of the term 'being that exists' which is associated with the argument from contingency. Can I equate this term with an abstract object (SEP) such as 'element' in the ...
RIYASUDHEEN T. K's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
292 views

How do we know things don't come into existence Ex Nihilo on their own?

The Kalam Cosmological Argument relies on the idea that things don't just pop into existence from nothing, or they don't come into existence Ex Nihilo. However, it seems that it justifies this based ...
Luke Hill's user avatar
  • 311
-1 votes
2 answers
136 views

Why is this argument supposedly improved?

Hello to all philosophers! A while ago my professor was going through the First Cause Argument and formatted it as such: Everything has a cause. The chain of causes cannot reach back indefinitely; ...
Abraham's user avatar
  • 483
0 votes
0 answers
83 views

Validation of an argument using Godels incompleteness theorem

In a discussion about the logical validation of contingency argument (Necessary existence), One said that the contingency argument results in a contradictory (Inconsistent) system according to Godel's ...
RIYASUDHEEN T. K's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
160 views

The Kalam Cosmological Argument

I have recently watched a discussion between William Lane Craig and the CosmicSkeptic about the Kalam, and it gave me this idea, and I doubt I'm the first to have it but what if causality is in itself ...
Jordan23's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
304 views

The concept of infinite past [closed]

Is it possible to give an a priori answer to whether or not an infinite past is possible?
user47483's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
243 views

Does the Kalam cosmological argument prove that the prime Creator created this universe directly

I was reading about the Kalam cosmological argument on wikipedia. The conclustion of which is: An uncaused, personal Creator of the universe exists, who sans the universe is beginningless, ...
user avatar
1 vote
4 answers
707 views

Is the Kalam cosmological argument scientifically provable?

Kalam Cosmological Argument: (1) Everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence. (2) The universe has a beginning of its existence. Therefore: (3) The universe has a ...
john taylor's user avatar
23 votes
13 answers
5k views

If the universe has a beginning does that prove God exists?

It is curious to note that a eminent Physicist like Stephen Hawking thinks the universe has a beginning. This has some rather startling Religious implications You can find the link here: http://www....
user avatar