Questions tagged [kant]

Immanuel Kant was a German Enlightenment philosopher.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
0 answers
36 views

Assumption about the existence of "knowledge a priori" by Kant

I am just starting to read Kant's Critique of Pure Reason translated by Max Mueller. In the introductory chapter, "General truths, which at the same time, bear the character of an inward ...
ahron's user avatar
  • 101
1 vote
1 answer
99 views

What is a "Sache" in Kant's metaphysics?

In Prolegomena §9: Freilich ist es auch alsdenn unbegreiflich, wie die Anschauung einer gegenwärtigen Sache mir diese sollte zu erkennen geben, wie sie an sich ist Translated to: Of course, even ...
gsmafra's user avatar
  • 583
1 vote
2 answers
179 views

In Kant, are "pure intuition" and "intuition a priori" synonyms?

I'm reading the prolegomena, and in §7, Kant presents both "pure intuition" (reine Anschauung), mentioned many times, and "intuition a priori" (Anschauung a priori), mentioned ...
gsmafra's user avatar
  • 583
0 votes
2 answers
154 views

Is the split between Continental and Analytical comparable to the split between Empiricism and Rationalism, if so can it be reconciled?

Just as Kant reconciled empiricism and rationalism, is there a project to unify analytical and continental ? Or is Analytical philosophy irreversibly ingrained in Scientism while continental ...
Ash Rivers's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
217 views

Newton and Kant about 'Absolute Space'

Newton starts his book The Mathematical Principals of Natural Philosophy, 1687 II. Absolute space, in its own nature, without regard to anything external, remains always similar and immovable. Kant ...
Jo Wehler's user avatar
  • 23.8k
3 votes
3 answers
785 views

How is 'Pure Intuition' possible according to Kant?

One of the key passages is from Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics (1783). According to Kant pure intution is the means to obtain mathematical theorems as synthetic a priori propositions. This ...
Jo Wehler's user avatar
  • 23.8k
1 vote
3 answers
177 views

Do scalar fields satisfy Kant's indefinitely-divisible matter thesis?

So Kant concluded vs. the Second Antinomy that matter is indefinitely divisible, so he would have taken issue with the idea that the Planck scale is the absolute limit, here. At first, I was thinking ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
71 views

Kant's Prolegomena §6 text interpretation "might reveal itself through these its effects"

I'm having a hard time trying to interpret this part of the text: Does not this capacity, since it is not, and cannot be, based on experience, presuppose some a priori basis for cognition, which lies ...
gsmafra's user avatar
  • 583
1 vote
0 answers
72 views

Is there a naturalized intuitionist mathematics? Is it Kantian?

I have in mind an interpretation of mathematics as intuitionalism, where intuitions are subjective (built from personal experience), but subjective experience is ultimately explained “objectively” a ...
J Kusin's user avatar
  • 2,385
5 votes
6 answers
293 views

Why must things in themselves remain wholly unknown?

I'm on the Transcendental Aesthetic (and so am well aware that Kant's reasoning here may become clearer later on) -- what confuses me is how it seems to follow, from the discovery that time and space, ...
WolandBarthes's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
322 views

What say Kantian ethics about capitalism?

As I did read, it does not look like Kantian ethics favors socialism (especially given it requires slavery by economic imperative), but I would like a more rigorous analysis. Note that Recall that ...
antinazi's user avatar
1 vote
4 answers
229 views

Is Mathematics a form of experience?

When someone experiences the mental clarity of 2 + 2 = 4, is this a form of experience similar to let's say, seeing red, or the sour taste of a pickle. On the one hand it seems like it is a form of ...
Arcanus's user avatar
  • 137
4 votes
3 answers
461 views

Where exactly Kant says ‘philosophy is to learn how to think …’?

this is a famous quote from Emanuel Kant: “philosophy is to learn how to think, and not to learn thoughts”. Where exactly did Kant say that? And what is the correct form of it?
Sasan's user avatar
  • 501
1 vote
1 answer
414 views

Kant's modal logic

It is customary nowadays to have the introduction rule for the possibility operator "◊" be a two-edged negation of the necessity operator "□": ◊A = ~□~A. It is also possible (haha!)...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
69 views

Analytic vs Dialectic logic

What are analytic and dialectic logic in Kantian philosophy? What's the difference between them and why can't we use analytic logic as an organon?
Saeed Saeed's user avatar
5 votes
4 answers
1k views

What exactly is Nietzsche’s criticism of the Thing-in-itself and is it supplanted by his Will to Power?

How did Nietzsche criticize the Thing-in-itself from Kantian philosophy? There are two popular claims: Nietzsche thought that we only know causation from experiences and and so cannot legitimately ...
viuser's user avatar
  • 4,570
0 votes
0 answers
54 views

The role of fiction and analogy in Kant’s epistemology

It seems undeniable that we can create new fictions by analogy and combination, which are merely inspired by what we take the basic structure of reality. For example, we do not (directly) experience a ...
viuser's user avatar
  • 4,570
2 votes
0 answers
334 views

What is the philosophical position that a metaphysical debate is caused by different mental models?

I'm looking for authors, papers, and hopefully, the name of the philosophical position that I describe here. I've seen a couple of papers so I know that they exist, but I can't recall the authors or ...
David Gudeman's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
269 views

Understanding some aspects of schematism in Kant's philosophy

I'm struggling to understand Kant's schematism. Kant says that imagination produces the synthesis of schemata and that schemata are how we can relate intuitions to concepts. He goes on to give the ...
Tarantula's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
179 views

I need help understanding Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

I need help in understanding Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason § 18 and 19. What Kant does there suggests an alternative to the idea that a concept represents a different object. So the question is about ...
Ericleast992's user avatar
21 votes
8 answers
8k views

Is it ethical to convince someone to get vaccinated?

I'm currently writing about the ethics of vaccinations, and I have two long-standing concerns about the matter. "Is refusing vaccination a morally justifiable position?" will be my question. ...
Ericleast992's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
62 views

The inquisition and Kantian morality

I read in Williams' book on truth that during the inquisition priests were eager to apply Kantian ethics under torture, and that this proved difficult because lies - and arguably secrets - were ...
user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
74 views

Complicity in Kantian ethics

Let's use the example of the trolly problem, as everyone seems to understand what is at stake there. If I have a radio to the train driver, am I "using people as means" if I: tell him to ...
user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
35 views

Cassirer and the Categorical Imperative

I've been reading some of the shorter works of the neo-Kantian and proto-semiologist Ernst Cassirer. While I find him a valuable bridge across the "continental divide," I'm not sure yet that ...
Nelson Alexander's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
478 views

What does Judith Jarvis Thomson's looped trolley problem show about Kant?

What does Judith Jarvis Thomson's looped trolley problem show about Kant? the bystander does not need or use the one workman to save the five, because the latter’s presence on the track contributes ...
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
44 views

What can be known and what can be believed when neither induction nor deduction is justified?

Kant is well known for taking seriously the lack of justification for induction voiced by Hume and finding what is left for us to be able to know and believe. I wonder, with the knowledge that the ...
Kniera Hoofd's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
137 views

Ontic/Ontological as parallel to a posteriori/a priori?

Heidegger makes the distinction between the ontic (concerning beings themselves) and the ontological (the being of beings, being as such). Would it be wise to say that the ontic covers the contingent ...
Oliver H's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
36 views

Does Kant merely assume that all other good things can be good *with* limitation in the absence of a good will?

To elaborate on my question: To argue that a good will is the only thing that is good without limitation, Kant must argue that all other good things are not good without limitation. To do this, doesn'...
part-two's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
47 views

Animal commodification

Is it morally or ethically justified to commodify animals (i.e., such as the tiger temple when it was a thing)? Should humans treat animals' ends (telos) with as much respect as we do ourselves? ...
Sam F's user avatar
  • 21
5 votes
4 answers
1k views

What is the meaning of "dialectic"and "analytic" in Kant's First Critique?

The meaning of the term dialectic, as in Transcendental Dialectic, in the Critique Of Pure Reason, is obscure. This, mixed with the already complex text, makes this term difficult to assess. A list of ...
RodolfoAP's user avatar
  • 6,831
4 votes
1 answer
478 views

Kant’s claim “there are only three kinds of proof for the existence of God”

There are only three kinds of proof for the existence of God possible from speculative reason. All paths on which one may set forth with this aim either begin from determinate experience and the ...
viuser's user avatar
  • 4,570
2 votes
1 answer
124 views

Are Ideas Noumenal?

I've been studying Kant's philosophy recently and I haven't been able to get something straight. Quick question here: How does Kant's distinction between phenomena/noumena apply to ideas and thoughts? ...
John Smith's user avatar
4 votes
3 answers
794 views

What is the difference between the “thing in itself” and noumena?

“Things in themselves” and noumena are similar in Kantian metaphysics (Critique of Pure Reason, mostly) and interchangeable much of the time. The phenomena/noumena divide is integral to Kantian ...
Just Some Old Man's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
402 views

Kant vs Scientific Rationalism - Do we need the Ding an Sich

I actually like Kant's distinction between noumena and phenomena. But I have a nagging doubt. If we look at modern physics, appearances can be explained by entities such as atoms, electrons and quarks ...
Marek's user avatar
  • 69
2 votes
1 answer
246 views

Did Kant ever explain why “senses do not err” when it comes to optical illusions?

Still less may we take appearance and illusion for one and the same. For truth and illusion are not in the object, insofar as it is intuited, but in the judgment about it insofar as it is thought. ...
viuser's user avatar
  • 4,570
-1 votes
3 answers
125 views

Is it always wrong to use other people for one's own purpose?

Kant says it is always wrong, do you agree or disagree? Is it always wrong to use other people for one's own purpose?
Alara's user avatar
  • 1
0 votes
1 answer
120 views

What do we mean by "if we have a proposition which is thought in conjunction with its own necessity"?

I am reading an English translation of Critique of Pure Reason by Kant and came across the statement "if we have a proposition which is thought in conjunction with its own necessity, we have an a ...
Prathik Rajendran M's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
980 views

Is the Categorical Imperative Simply Bad Math? :)

The title is clickbait, but the question is not. First, The Categorical Imperative: Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law. ...
philoque's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
46 views

Are there any philosophers after Kant but before Peirce that developed the Kantian concept of schema further?

I was reading Peirce's writings on schemata and I was wondering if there was any other known philosopher before him who tried to use or extend schemata in his work. Are there any philosophers after ...
GEP's user avatar
  • 552
10 votes
2 answers
2k views

What was Kant's argument for absolute space from a single hand being necessarily either left or right?

In their book "Von Glückzahl bis Geheimzahl" Christian Hesse and Karsten Schwanke write: As far as the absoluteness of space is concerned, Kant gave the so-called argument from the first ...
vonjd's user avatar
  • 1,033
0 votes
2 answers
212 views

The Ontological Argument and Kant's Critique

Do you think Plantinga's claim that Anselm does not use existence as a predicate/attribute in his proof is consistent? I don't think it's quite right. Because Plantinga himself states that Anselm uses ...
an ignorant man 's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
65 views

Roles of sensibility, understanding and imagination in Kant's epistemology

According to Kantian epistemology, there are three falcuties of mind; sensibility, understanding and imagination. Unfortunately, the differentiation between these three are not totally sure to me so I ...
Dimen's user avatar
  • 363
1 vote
2 answers
160 views

Understanding Kant's view on space and time

I am trying to understand Kant's view on space and time. After reading several articles, I think I somewhat understood what he is trying to say, but I'd like to get my view approved. Here is how I ...
Dimen's user avatar
  • 363
5 votes
1 answer
96 views

Is Russell's "(im)predicativity" terminology related to (or even derived from) Kant's "existence is not a predicate" argument?

I'm a mathematician who's generally ignorant of philosophy, so forgive me if my question is a bit sloppy. I'm really trying to ask about a historical connection/context. I recently encountered the ...
Josh Keneda's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
736 views

What did Kant mean by "objects" and how do they relate to intutions and concepts?

I am trying to understand Kant's taxonomy of ideas (or "representations") and I am stuck on his meaning of "intuition", in particular, whether or not the object of an intuition ...
SihOASHoihd's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
178 views

Views on the Implications of Temporal Subjectivity upon Shared Experience

With notions of subjective time (i.e. time as empirically inert) like those put forward by Berkeley, Hume, Leibniz and Kant, is there anything out there which speculates on the potential for a varied ...
Tomas's user avatar
  • 21
2 votes
1 answer
345 views

Categorical imperative vs. Consequentialism

i am new to philosophy. I am willing to understand where is the fine border between action-based and consequence-based morals: To my understanding a deontologist judges an action irrelative of the ...
Embrulla's user avatar
5 votes
4 answers
493 views

Space and time in Kant and space and time in physics

From the Kantian perspective, what would be the relationship between our intuitions of space and time (which form the structure of subjective experience and are not things that exist outside of human ...
Joa's user avatar
  • 478
2 votes
1 answer
68 views

How does Kant treat the sublime in the Anthropology compared with the Third Critique?

Is Kant treating the sublime consistently in the third critique and Anthropology? In other words, what are the differences being addressed in these empirical and transcendental inquires regarding the ...
Paradox Lost's user avatar
  • 1,855
3 votes
1 answer
145 views

Renovating transcendental idealism

In the 20th century, philosophers such as P.F Strawson and Paul Guyer attempted to disentangle (what they viewed as) the unsavory components of Kant's system of transcendental idealism from (what they ...
Joa's user avatar
  • 478

1 2
3
4 5
16