Questions tagged [knowledge]

Knowledge is a familiarity with someone or something, which can include facts, information, descriptions, or skills acquired through experience or education.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
1 answer
79 views

Knowledge-that, knowing-what, epistemic logic, and invertible functions

There's a subsection of my main argument (in my offline notes) that goes: ∃f(f(𝔼) = ♪) If we knew what f was in particular, then we could go to f -1(♪) = 𝔼 But this would make 𝔼 knowable in a well-...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
84 views

What does "p is true for S at t" mean?

In Alvin Goldman's article "What Is Justified Belief", what does "p is true for S at t" mean? where p is a proposition, S is a person and t is time. More specifically, how is it ...
Charles's user avatar
  • 19
3 votes
3 answers
455 views

What is a complete understanding?

In a comment to this recent question of mine, somebody used the phrase, "complete understanding." Without necessarily answering the linked question (i.e. without defining "understanding&...
Corbin's user avatar
  • 500
0 votes
0 answers
36 views

What differences and relationships are between "innate ideas" and "presuppositions of knowledge"?

p149 of Section "Rationalism and Empiricism" in Big Questions by Solomon talkss about "innate ideas": One of the main points of debate between the rationalists and the empiricists�...
Tim's user avatar
  • 465
0 votes
0 answers
35 views

Is John Locke's Empiricism Unempirical?

The esteemed seventeenth-century English philosopher John Locke famously declares that we are tabula rasa (blank slates). When it comes to human understanding we rely upon the force of experience (...
Paradox Lost's user avatar
  • 1,855
1 vote
1 answer
51 views

How is synthetic knowledge produced in fictionalism?

With the Greek gods being fictional there is still objective knowledge - how many Greek female gods are there, etc. (Or if that's still too ambiguous, how many Greek gods are named Zeus). But "...
J Kusin's user avatar
  • 2,302
2 votes
1 answer
64 views

Using 'love' to make sense of knowledge

I love my spouse, but I suspect (I think I believe the are) they are cheating on me, and I've even heard my friends gossip about my spouse's affairs etc.. But I love my spouse, so do not think I know -...
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
55 views

Help sourcing a quote - "There is no doctrine so invalid..."

Recently a quote popped into my head, which I recall as a Bishop Berkeley proposition. But on further looking into the matter, I can't seem to find it. It's within the general area of the following: "...
shman613's user avatar
  • 101
0 votes
2 answers
124 views

All we know is that we know nothing? Can we know anything?

Many great philosophers doubted their knowledge. The Paradox of Induction touches on this skepticism Skeptics say that all knowledge and scientific progress is based on inductive logic, which is ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,893
0 votes
0 answers
15 views

What is Sustainable philosophy of the Objective kind?

Umm... new to site & so new Q. Had to set up a new space to ask such a Question on Quora recently. Called the Environment of Philosophy Space where there Q. & Answers in reality explaining the ...
peter m's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
66 views

What is a succinct description of the problem of the criterion?

I've been studying the problem of the criterion for about a month, and I'm finding that there is a paradox involved with knowing it. Supposedly, as I interpret, in order to know what the problem of ...
Dennis Francis Blewett's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
106 views

How do I know what I don't know?

I am not looking for a straight answer to this question but some references on how I should further investigate this problem. Problem Let us consider a person bob When Bob makes a statement, he ...
Shriman Keshri's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
223 views

What would constitute as justification?

Follow up to this post. The question here is quite short, what would constitute as justification in regards to justified belief theory? Seems something a bit vague to me. My main motivation to this ...
Reine Abstraktion's user avatar
0 votes
5 answers
112 views

Does the idea that we can’t know anything for sure contradict itself?

Wouldn’t this itself be a statement of knowledge? By anything, I don’t mean to include experience or having a sense of consciousness, which we all likely atleast feel certain about or in agreement ...
thinkingman's user avatar
6 votes
4 answers
254 views

What is the difference between understanding and interpretation?

What is the difference in the cognitive processes of understanding and interpreting an utterance (especially written discourse like a legal statute)? What does a judge do when they interpret law; is ...
George Ntoulos's user avatar
0 votes
4 answers
224 views

Do judges violate due process in their efforts to make a logical connection between would-be evidence and facts in question?

Note: I had this post with a question that follows, but then I reformed the question again. I've used ChatGPT to help me research this issue, and I think it has been somewhat helpful. For anyone ...
Dennis Francis Blewett's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
59 views

Does context dependence mean agents who are being irrational may, in some contexts, have knowledge attributed to them?

Suppose I can justify something to some small extent. I thought I could smell someone else's perfume on my husband this evening. And I am a jealous wife, so believed he was having an affair. But I had ...
user avatar
1 vote
4 answers
206 views

Logic as an obstacle to knowledge

Has there been any philosopher making an argument along the lines that logic is an obstacle to knowledge about the world? The informal argument could go something like: logic is created by humans (...
Frank's user avatar
  • 2,347
2 votes
0 answers
77 views

Can moral truths be known a priori or are they based on experience?

I am currently working on an essay that explores the concept of a priori knowledge and whether or not it can exist. I would love to hear any thoughts or opinions on this topic that anyone may have. ...
cricket900's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
42 views

Can, "This problem is unsolvable," be used to formulate the first incompleteness theorem in erotetic logic specifically?

Assumptions/definitions: the Gödel sentence is informally equivalent to, "This sentence can't be proved in system X," where X is appropriately specified. Since that sentence can itself be ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
77 views

Given I have no moral knowledge, can I still know what the best course of action is?

Given I have no moral knowledge, can I still know what the best course of action is? Do moral non-cognitivists or error theorists know that they shouldn't steal the car, that they should go buy milk, ...
user avatar
1 vote
4 answers
603 views

Epistemic failure and blaming others [closed]

It seems we have epistemic responsibilities To be responsible is to be the proper object of one or more of the normative rather than evaluative attitudes, namely praise, blame, or neutral appraisal. ...
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
62 views

Would a "disagreement operator" break down if iterated too much?

Let D(S) read as, "I disagree that S." It is possible to iterate this, so that DD(S), "I disagree that I disagree that S." Then we can go on to DDD(S), and so on. (For a peer-...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
59 views

Is the unlearned nature of language a la Chomsky a way back into logical empiricist epistemology?

***I'm struggling to erect the supports of this question because of lack of knowledge, I hope that it makes sense and is useful and appropriate for this site. I'm hoping there's a form of logical ...
J Kusin's user avatar
  • 2,302
3 votes
2 answers
129 views

How do we use topology to model knowledge?

The topology of knowledge: In this application, topological spaces are used to model the structure of knowledge, where the open sets correspond to coherent bodies of knowledge and the closure ...
Sayaman's user avatar
  • 3,807
5 votes
4 answers
225 views

Is scientific knowledge personal or general?

This question was considered off topic in "History of science and mathematics". According to a comment by Alexandre Eremenko it belonged to philosophy.stackexchange.com. I don't understand ...
Mikael Jensen's user avatar
4 votes
4 answers
435 views

Is the temperance resulting from the socratic maxim "know thyself" always about knowing others?

I was just thinking about what good 'know thyself' means. There is something arguably narcissistic and unnecessary - or at least self absorbed - about examining your life just to know your own flaws ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
182 views

Lumen naturale, Lumen gratiae, Lumen fidei, what are they?

Unfortunately, I'm unable to locate a good source to cite on these terms you see in the question title. Below is a short abstract based on Google. Natural light (lumen naturale), equivalent to lumen ...
Agent Smith's user avatar
  • 2,860
2 votes
2 answers
107 views

When I present information (to myself or others), e.g. by making a statement, is this accompanied by another statement, that what I said is true?

When I make a first-order claim like, "The sky is cloudy right now," is this claim implicitly accompanied by a second-order claim like, "What I just said is true/not a lie"? Or ...
Tushar's user avatar
  • 21
3 votes
1 answer
43 views

How should I define the problem of skepticism and the criteria for its solution?

I am writing an epistemology essay on whether a particular theory solves the 'problem of skepticism'. I am familiar with the skeptical paradox, but I am not sure exactly how to define what a solution ...
lovelace0207's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
102 views

I want to start reading more into philosophy, what should i start out with

I have some stoic books by Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius and some Kant and the myth of Sisyphus, but I don't know where to go now.
Temujin Norris's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
57 views

Are logical truths a subset of facts which in turn is a subset of possible truths?

Are logical truths (those that are true in all possible interpretations) a subset of facts (known via observation in our reality)? Are facts a subset of possible truths(satisfiable)? Where do axioms ...
csp's user avatar
  • 380
0 votes
2 answers
104 views

Knowing that they know that you know that they know

Suppose there are two spies, A and B. There is also a secret, s. The following situation unfolds: (1) A learns s. (2) B learns that A knows s. (3) A learns that B knows that A knows s. (4) B learns ...
pastel_questions's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
54 views

Human Knowledge definition and architecture [closed]

Hello Every one I'm really determined to understand what is human knowledge and its main fields. For me knowledge is the must important concern for humanity. I read some books and the one who really ...
herbert pondi's user avatar
2 votes
6 answers
243 views

How do we know (i.e. justify our belief) that time exists without "proving too much"?

How do we know that time exists? This is a complex question. First, we cannot make sense of a question like this without first establishing what we mean by knowledge. For convenience, let's pick the ...
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
82 views

What does Aristotle think about the relation between blindness, knowledge and memory?

I’m trying to understand Aristotle’s views on blindness, as given in these passages: "just as the blind remember better, being released from having their faculty of memory engaged with objects ...
Micheal's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
75 views

Intersection of the Gettier problem and knowing-what or knowing-how

From what I can tell, it seems like the Gettier problem comes down to Smith not knowing that the man who has ten coins in his pocket is going to get the job. What about Smith knowing what the ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
69 views

How many "degrees" of knowledge is conceivable?

Not sure if this is the right place for this, but there's something I've been pondering about and can't wrap my head around. Say person A knows something, that person B does not. Let's call that the ...
kennyg's user avatar
  • 111
8 votes
16 answers
4k views

Can we doubt all knowledge?

Can we doubt all knowledge from all sources (perception, reports, and reason)? Regarding doubting reason, reason can't be proven, it is preceived and judged instantly by our logic, but what if our ...
AZeed's user avatar
  • 278
1 vote
0 answers
50 views

Why don't we approach the problem of knowledge as "that what we do NOT ignore"? [closed]

There is a long tradition trying to approach knowledge as a true and justified belief (The Tripartite Analysis of Knowledge . Recently, Gettier(1963) just showed that we need more than those 3 ...
Felipe Viveros's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
164 views

To obtain knowledge must we acquire specific other knowledge first?

It would seem obvious we must acquire some knowledge before other knowledge. I want to emphasize specific prior knowledge though. I don’t want to just say to get to Paris you just travel through an ...
J Kusin's user avatar
  • 2,302
1 vote
2 answers
153 views

Is it ever appropriate to say a phenomenon is unexplainable?

Scientific research involves the investigation of difficult problems, and constantly tries to explain the unknown through observations and logical reasoning. Take a situation like finding a cure for ...
DdogBoss's user avatar
  • 103
2 votes
2 answers
147 views

A question on knowledge as justified true belief

I am not a philosophy student and I have a question on the term "justified" in the definition of knowledge. Suppose that I have some reasons for justifying a proposition. Is it necessary ...
reza-ebadi's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
49 views

Does Bayesianism not have a concept of knowledge, given that belief is partial and not categorical?

If Bayesianism replaces the categorical belief of former analyses of knowledge with a quantitative notion of partial belief, does Bayesianism have a concept of 'knowledge' at all?
Elizabeth Cooke's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
202 views

Gradations of epistemological categories

For my philosophy discussion group, I am looking for real life examples that would fit the above illustration. What would be some good examples? Data is a collection of facts, while information puts ...
blackened's user avatar
  • 443
0 votes
1 answer
209 views

Examples of "a priori knowledge" in Kant

What are some good examples of a priori knowledge that must exist independent of experience and transcend it? How can we be certain that such is indeed a priori? The example Kant mentions in the ...
ahron's user avatar
  • 101
0 votes
0 answers
35 views

Assumption about the existence of "knowledge a priori" by Kant

I am just starting to read Kant's Critique of Pure Reason translated by Max Mueller. In the introductory chapter, "General truths, which at the same time, bear the character of an inward ...
ahron's user avatar
  • 101
5 votes
6 answers
2k views

Does knowledge require consciousness?

Does knowledge require consciousness for the entity that knows? In other words, is it the case that only conscious entities can know things? I was led to ask this question by considering whether or ...
user107952's user avatar
  • 4,912
4 votes
3 answers
787 views

Truth vs Knowledge

I'm a little confused when philosophers speak of truth and knowledge. Is there any meaningful difference between truth and knowledge in epistemology? Or are they really the same thing, since false ...
John Smith's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
100 views

As humans, do we require a total understanding of information to fully embody it as knowledge?

As humans, do we require a total understanding of information to fully embody it as knowledge? Is the underlying mechanism of the act of knowledge dependent on a complete understanding of theories, ...
Mike's user avatar
  • 11

1
2 3 4 5
8