Questions tagged [meaning]
**NOTE: This tag should not be used.** For questions about the nature of meaning, please use "philosophy-of-language" if you want to ask about the meaning of some quote or idea, please use the name of that idea.
5
votes
0answers
59 views
Meaning in use and naturalisation of intentionality
What is the relation between pragmatism and intentionality?
Two different enterprises in philosophy seem to be well established and yet contradicting:
Inferential Pragmatism: from Wittgenstein and ...
6
votes
4answers
129 views
The myth of the given and externalism
According to Wilfrid Sellars any talk of a given out there should be condemned as a mere myth. Therefore, nothing from the physical world outside can limit our language - the "space of reason", and ...
3
votes
0answers
80 views
Which philosophers would argue that hard determinism makes life more purposeful than randomness?
It appears to me that randomness could or could not produce something meaningful but either way hard determinism seems a better bet. Is there a writer who explores this territory?
1
vote
2answers
66 views
How do you talk about unclear or indefinite statements
In logic a statement can be
the assertion that is made by a true or false declarative sentence... a statement is viewed as a truth bearer
However, in everyday speech a statement is
a definite ...
2
votes
3answers
137 views
What analytic philosophers were concerned with meaninglessness?
What analytic philosophers were concerned primarily with meaninglessness, and where can I read what they said about it?
I just find the idea interesting, but I want to circumvent existentialism for a ...
3
votes
0answers
100 views
In which sense Quine denies that the translated expressions do have a meaning?
Early on Kuhn drew a parallel with Quine's thesis of the indeterminacy of translation (1970a, 202; 1970c, 268). According to the latter, if we are translating one language into another, there are ...
2
votes
1answer
106 views
What does it mean to say what happens in your experience is inside your mind in a way in which what happens in your brain is not?
"If what happens in your experience is inside your mind in a way in
which what happens in your brain is not, it looks as though your
experiences and other mental states can't just be physical ...
2
votes
2answers
134 views
Philosophical approach for discussing the meaning of many words?
I lack a good background in philosophy and often get stuck while trying to understand it. There is a particular issue that keeps me from understanding or enjoying or appreciating many videos or texts ...
2
votes
1answer
101 views
Is “quality of life” an in-efficacious measure for a “meaningful life”?
Definitions
Quality of life (QOL) is the general well-being of individuals and societies, outlining negative and positive features of life. It observes life satisfaction, including everything from ...
1
vote
4answers
198 views
In the joke about math vs. philosophy, why don't philosophy departments need erasers? [closed]
I don't understand the joke (before the era computing) quoted by Peter Flom:
The math department is the 2nd cheapest one to supply in the university: All the[y] need are pencils, paper and erasers. ...
0
votes
0answers
50 views
Quine's Proxy Function Argument & the Inscrutability of Reference -Help
The inscrutability of reference is the thesis that for any natural language L, there is no fact of the matter about what the referring expressions of L refer to, or about what the predicates of L ...
3
votes
3answers
176 views
Purposelessness and DNA Propagating
Positivist evolutionary biologists claim that living beings are nothing but byproduct of purposeless random evolution. (For example, say, a flower is just a DNA propagating machine.)
I am especially ...
2
votes
4answers
68 views
Can purpose be attributed to events without grounding in agency
As observers we observe events around us. All events have causes, either deterministic causes or non-deterministic ones. As observers however we can additionally attribute purpose (or meaning as in ...
2
votes
4answers
141 views
Help to explain the meaning of work beyond the sole purpose of making money
My brother is obsessed with money and I feel like the sole reason he works is to make money,
I think in your work you should aim for goals of higher value ie. not only should you earn money but your ...
4
votes
2answers
203 views
What makes our words different than symbols like X?
There is an issue that blurs my head. For instance, lets have a proposition p that says: “X is round”. X is a symbol that we could mark something into. If we say X is an orange fruit, then the ...
1
vote
0answers
225 views
What is Derrida's différance?
I am very perplexed by the concept of différance. Is it even a concept at all? I've had some sources saying otherwise. How should I interpret this?
1
vote
3answers
79 views
Does an overridden duty still exist while it is overridden?
I'm an LSAT instructor and I've been stuck on the following LSAT question ever since I first saw it.
This question is in the only freely available LSAT (Section 3, #18). If this question is ...
2
votes
2answers
69 views
What's the name of the argumentation position / logical fallacy of saying “well prove it doesn't exist”
For e.g someone says they believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster. When you ask for evidence they reply: "well, prove it doesn't exist!"
Surely it's the prerogative of the believer to provide ...
1
vote
1answer
78 views
What is the name of the fallacy when someone conflates a motivation for one of the variables?
Some examples:
"An atheist killed someone. They killed them because they were an atheist."
"A man strangled his wife. He is clearly a misogynist."
As you can see, one variable has been extrapolated ...
9
votes
3answers
1k views
What fallacy infers motivation from mere description?
Here's some example:
"Men dominate women in the majority of fortune top 100 CEO positions"
"Women dominate men in primary school teaching jobs"
Neither the men nor the women are actually purposely ...
3
votes
3answers
44 views
What's the term/phrase when someone assumes you take on the diametrically opposed view simply because you negate a position?
What's the term/phrase when someone assumes that you take on the diametrically opposed view simply because you disagree with a position?
For example, I recently posted an article challenging ...
10
votes
3answers
366 views
What are the relations between externalism (Kripke, Putnam) and holism (Quine) about meaning?
Three points are not clear to me about the relations between semantic externalism (Kripke, Putnam) and holism (Quine):
Is there a way according to which externalism and holism can be held together or ...
1
vote
2answers
292 views
Some questions on “context” in Mathematical Logic
Recently I was having a discussion with user21820 in this chatroom. There very naively (in the sense that I didn't choose carefully each word of my following statement) I expressed the opinion that,
...
10
votes
4answers
4k views
What is the difference between responsibility and commitment?
I was recently looking at philosophy of responsibility, and something interesting which I had not thought about before, was that the way we use "responsibility" includes things not necessarily caused ...
9
votes
2answers
221 views
Can there be a sufficient account of meaning without an account of intentionality?
Much has been said in recent philosophy in criticism of representationalist theories of meaning. The idea is that any representation can represent what it will only in a prior, limiting context. ...
6
votes
2answers
109 views
Would a pragmatist allow that meaning is representational of things in its use?
Pragmatism contends that use should be stressed when talking about the meaning of words before 'representation'.
But what if we were to look at signification/representation as a sort of activity?
If ...
3
votes
1answer
58 views
How are you intended to interpret x.R and x.S in Davidson “Truth and Meaning”?
I'm entirely unfamiliar with the syntax and corresponding semantics Davidson uses for the four equations at the beginning of Truth and Meaning. He states that the following sentences are supposed to ...
1
vote
0answers
44 views
Are anti-realists faced with a point where they have to take for granted the referential function of words to things that are not words?
Pragmatism is strongly associated with anti-realism, the view that words are meaningful not because they represent a reality independent of the word itself but because of how they are used in a given ...
0
votes
2answers
161 views
How do pragmatists explain how words attach to things in reality?
If I'm feeling particularly despotic I can tell my daughter to go pick me up an apple in the dining room. A couple of seconds later and I am greeted with the thunk of an apple dropping on my lap.
...
1
vote
1answer
43 views
Writings on meaning within a materialist framework
Most people in 2016 who are paying attention accept the materialist perspective, that is that the scope of the universe is made up of physical phenomena that follow natural laws.
For the brunt of ...
6
votes
4answers
386 views
Is Peirce's pragmatic maxim self-evident?
Peirce's pragmatic maxim seems to have an appeal, at least as a "tiebreaker":
Consider what effects, that might conceivably have practical bearings, we conceive the object of our conception to have....
6
votes
3answers
113 views
In laymen terms, What is the meaning of 'meaning' in the the question “is there meaning to life”
Every now and then people talk about whether there is meaning to life, including myself. However recently I have realised I have assumed the definition. My understanding of it is that it is asking ...
2
votes
2answers
70 views
Did Quine have another reason to be skeptical of reference besides its context-dependence?
Quine, like many others before him, thought that the meaning of words depends on the context they are in.
But what compelled Quine to hold that in light of this there is an ambiguity as to what any ...
2
votes
2answers
156 views
Why did Wittgenstein think that only something that could be doubted could have meaning?
One of the reasons Wittgenstein thought the exclusive use of ostensive definition failed was because it opened the possibility that a given symbol's meaning was sourced from whatever sensation someone ...
3
votes
2answers
539 views
How do we know that Wyman and McX aren't the same person?
Quine thought that only that which exists can be referred to, or in other words 'to be is to be the value of a bound variable'.
However, what of his equally famous fictional characters Wyman and McX?...
4
votes
7answers
444 views
Is “A and not-A” meaningful (and false) or meaningless?
Is there any phrase of the form "A and not-A" that is meaningful?
We can imagine vernacular expressions with that form that carry meaning. I could say, "I do like France and at the same time I don't ...
1
vote
3answers
391 views
What is the nature of pragmatism as a claim? Can pragmatism ever be understood as a claim in light of its own conditions?
Pragmatism is the suggestion that truth-value and meaning should be talked about in terms of the way we use those terms. All such talk should be hashed out in terms of the practical bearings of such ...
5
votes
3answers
758 views
What is the difference between propositional sign and proposition in Wittgenstein's Tractatus?
While explaining the problem of what philosophy is according to Wittgenstein's Tractatus, Frank P. Ramsey says:
a propositional sign is clear insofar as the internal properties of
its sense are ...
11
votes
1answer
937 views
Do Wittgenstein and Quine give the same criticisms of semantics?
What is the connection between the criticisms offered by Wittgenstein and Quine of meaning and language? Are both philosophers generally criticizing the same semantic theories with similar arguments, ...
0
votes
0answers
62 views
Meaning in Current Philosophy
I know that the question of the definition of meaning was one of the hotter topics in early/mid-20th century (and some later 19th century) philosophy, but I haven't heard too much about it, recently. ...
2
votes
1answer
130 views
Can meaning indeterminately be said to be indeterminate?
James Ross has given several reasons as to why he believes thought (and formal thought especially) is determinate. Among these, and under a formulation put forward by the contemporary philosopher ...
2
votes
1answer
348 views
What responses have made to Kripke's criticism of the descriptivist theory of meaning?
Under the influence of Kripke's acute analysis, there has been a growing trend of modern essentialism, or in other words, the assertion that there are 'essential' descriptors (rigid designators) that '...
7
votes
1answer
144 views
Was indeterminacy of linguistic meaning, as understood by Quine, anticipated by the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition?
Quine held that the meaning of words was indeterminate. The reasons he holds this view all seem to have in common a certain aspect; the indeterminacy that occurs occurs within what might be called '...
5
votes
3answers
1k views
Can a life have a trivial meaning if it's all there is?
I was thinking about (something like) Nagel's view from nowhere
When one takes up this most external standpoint and views one's
finite—and even downright puny—impact on the world, little of one's
...
2
votes
0answers
68 views
How do debates about meaning affect the status of personal religious beliefs?
Debates about the meaning of meaning cut across the analytic/continental divide. According to externalist accounts (e.g. Kripke-Putnam's) people believe, or even know, that beeches are different from ...
0
votes
2answers
117 views
Is taking a drug that makes us mentally go back in time and simulate our life in sleep the same as doing it “physically”? [closed]
Imagine if you had done something really bad in the past which had caused you suffering in the present. You really want to go back in time and change it. Unfortunately, at the moment, it's impossible ...
2
votes
0answers
30 views
Does Ricoeur Elaborate His Essay in a Book?
I'm reading "the model of the text : meaningful action considered as a text" in New Literary History by Paul Ricoeur, and I'm wondering if there Ricoeur has a more extended treatment of this elsewhere ...
1
vote
2answers
202 views
Is Nietzsche saying here that agnostics admire the unintelligible?
I need help understanding the last two paragraphs of the 25th section, third essay, which is provided below from the free link: http://home.sandiego.edu/~janderso/360/genealogy3.htm
Similarly who ...
1
vote
2answers
47 views
“To experience person to person – artist to viewer – a shared sensation”
What does the second half of this paragraph mean?
In viewing art, we recognise that we are not alone, confined by our mental and physical boundaries. We merge into a collective consciousness. Of ...
3
votes
2answers
256 views
What is the reflection of a mind discarded?
It's my first time in the Philosophy section of Stack Exchange. Since I am a non-native speaker, normally I ask questions in English Language Learners. However, I thought this one was in the field of ...
