Questions tagged [metaethics]
Metaethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, epistemological, semantic, and psychological, presuppositions and commitments of moral thought, talk, and practice.
187
questions
4
votes
0
answers
33
views
Can erotetic logic be used to devise a noncognitivist moral realism?
The IEP article on moral realism says that noncognitivist realism is logically possible, but goes on to assess the one attempt at such a position (Bruce Waller's) thusly:
Waller’s divide-and-conquer ...
- 12.5k
3
votes
2
answers
167
views
Does saying "a morally good singer is a morally good person" undermine Geach's attempt to undermine Moore?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Peter Geach used the infelicity of statements like, "A good singer is thusly a good person," to try to show that G. E. Moore's sense of the word "good" ...
- 12.5k
2
votes
2
answers
95
views
A problem regarding an impermanent hell
Regarding the Abrahamic hells, one could say that they are absolutely terrible for it is suffering without end, an eternal suffering; but there is a puzzling different type of hell or hells, those of ...
- 67
0
votes
1
answer
45
views
What meta-ethics is most commonly associated with 'hard determinism'?
Since moral responsibility seems to require free will, hard
determinism implies that people are not morally responsible for their
actions.
So what exactly does that imply about supposed moral ...
user67675
3
votes
1
answer
109
views
Does the private language argument conflict with monotheism?
This blog post opposes the PLA to unitarianism (the belief in only one divine person), which is mostly a parochial, intra-Christian objection that, if generalized over other religions, seems like it ...
- 12.5k
0
votes
0
answers
43
views
Relativist or not, if harm is objectively bad, is that sufficient for mind independent values?
I suspect that harm is objectively bad, but I'm unsure whether the negative value of what is harmful is mind independent, because while I cannot take seriously any claim that, relative to me or not, ...
user67675
0
votes
0
answers
54
views
According to which meta ethical theories are only some things permissible and everyone is right about what is permitted?
Can someone give a run down of the popular ways of thinking about ethics and which meta-ethical theories claim that only some things are permitted? I've read a couple of SEP articles on ethics, ...
user67675
7
votes
2
answers
76
views
Would an extremely unified being be able to issue more than one particular command?
Suppose that there is an actus purus, a being that is entirely active, impassible (nothing happens to this being), and which has no proper parts (its only part is itself entirely), not even abstract ...
- 12.5k
3
votes
0
answers
46
views
Physicalist Critiques of Error Theory
Mackie’s Error Theory makes two parallel arguments that moral qualities have no place in a naturalistic understanding of our universe. That (1) such a bizarre epistemic power unlike any other we ...
- 693
0
votes
0
answers
30
views
If we used √OB and √𝓐 operations, could we have a demi-is/demi-ought proposition that bridged full "is" with full "ought"?
The insight that the teleological ethicist seems to have is that final causality is a type of the moral law in the Kantian sense (from the second Critique):
... the moral law has no faculty but the ...
- 12.5k
2
votes
2
answers
61
views
Does the Introduction of Teleology into Ethical Discourse Solve Hume's Is/Ought Problem?
For Hume, no one could describe objective reasons for thinking that a man ought to do something generally, becuase there was no way to derive an ought from an is. But, if a classical view of causality ...
- 165
1
vote
1
answer
47
views
Open Self vs. Closed Self/Society Distinction
In political philosophy and cultural studies, certain thinkers from the twentieth-century stand out for their reliance upon distinguishing between open and closed selfhood. It is a long-running theme ...
- 1,855
1
vote
2
answers
59
views
Does the claim of an is/ought gap presuppose relevance logic (at least for morality-talk)?
Imagine Hume's remarks but with reference to the usual disjunction introduction:
In every system of conjunction, which I have hitherto met with, I have always remarked, that the author proceeds for ...
- 12.5k
1
vote
1
answer
38
views
Is Aquinas' ethics a case of a supererogation-first system?
Section 2.2 of the SEP article on modal epistemology differentiates possibility-first from necessity-first systems. Per modal logic, one can take these as metaphysical readings of the order-of-...
- 12.5k
0
votes
1
answer
51
views
A restriction on an action-language
Suppose that it is possible to "construct" a language where individual virtuous actions can make a referential contribution, sequentially in concerto, so that different patterns are ...
- 12.5k
0
votes
1
answer
54
views
If Zalta objects exist, would there be a contingently abstract obligation?
One of the posits of Zaltaesque object theory (let's call it that, since there is something vaguely Kafkaesque about logicist realism) is that for every set of assertible encoding relations there is ...
- 12.5k
2
votes
1
answer
64
views
Understanding meta ethical judgement in nicomachean ethics
I'm reading Nicomachean Ethics's penguin classics version and the introduction section contains this paragraph and I'm having some trouble understanding this.
From what I've read so far I understand ...
- 73
1
vote
0
answers
30
views
Is my understanding of projectivism correct?
From Miller's An Introduction to Contemporary Meta-ethics:
"Emotivism is a form of projectivism: when we use 'is wrong' in an evaluative judgement [...] we are treating 'wrong' as if it is a ...
- 121
1
vote
0
answers
32
views
How can projectivism explain the ban on mixed worlds?
The following is from section 4.2(b) of Miller's Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics.
Supervenience says that if two acts, events, or situations share the same naturalistic properties, then they ...
- 121
3
votes
3
answers
141
views
Can moral dilemmas be resolved in an amoral way?
By a moral dilemma I mean a situation in which there are multiple possible courses of action (or inaction) each of which leads to different outcomes and the agent has to choose which one to take. The ...
- 2,576
0
votes
0
answers
36
views
Good literature on the implications of philosophy of mind for ethics?
It seems to me that positions in philosophy of mind have implications for ethics that most of the literature I have read does not explore. Some examples:
Does mental externalism imply torturing a ...
- 79
0
votes
1
answer
65
views
Is the ideal agent the ideal observer?
Is the ideal agent the ideal observer?
Without googling it, I mean the former is the best moral agent, and the latter some meta-ethical (can't recall what meta-ethics) abstraction that judges everyone'...
user65545
0
votes
0
answers
50
views
Under which meta-ethical theories can we forfeit any rights?
I don't mean "human rights", which has a question already. I suppose that not all rights are human rights, though that may not be the case: I think people may actually have a right not to be ...
user65174
8
votes
15
answers
7k
views
Is it logical to seek revenge?
People believe revenge or "violence" to be illogical, impractical and immoral; illogical because the "violence" is executed in impulsive rage, impractical because the wheel of &...
- 1,923
1
vote
0
answers
43
views
Would objectivist utilitarianism be considered to be a form of moral absolutism?
Wikipedia defines moral absolutism as the view that "there is at least one principle that ought never to be violated". Does this mean that even someone who holds morally objectivist ...
- 683
4
votes
5
answers
1k
views
Can non-agents be moral or immoral?
Human children and non-human animals are denied moral status or equal consideration with human adults due to their lack of consciousness, reason or autonomy
They are not moral agents or subjects of ...
- 1,923
5
votes
0
answers
102
views
What's wrong with aretaic consequentialism?
What problems does it face, either as a classification of Buddhism or as meta ethical theory in general?
Another approach [to how to classify Buddhist ethics] is aretaic consequentialism, an indirect ...
user64448
1
vote
0
answers
36
views
Is the set of all good things incommensurable with the sets we use the natural/related numbers for?
Suppose that there is a set of all good things, and that it is well-founded. Then it would not be an element of itself, i.e. would not be a good thing. Maybe it would be hypergood, but maybe it would ...
- 12.5k
0
votes
1
answer
52
views
In divine command theory, is there anything malum in se? Or in other words, is there a distinction between malum in se and malum prohibitum?
In Divine Command Theory, is there any distinction between malum in se and malum prohibitum, when it comes to divine commandments (as opposed to human defined laws)?
For example, I would see failure ...
- 2,232
3
votes
6
answers
2k
views
What is the name of the philosophy that believes one should do whatever they want?
The philosophy in question believes:
You only live once, and you have predetermined desires from your genetics and environment. If these desires are not fulfilled as short-term or long-term goals you ...
user63990
1
vote
0
answers
44
views
Does Kant read the is/ought question in a way different from the "normal" reading?
First, to quote Hume:
In every system of morality, which I have hitherto met with, I have always remarked, that the author proceeds for some time in the ordinary way of reasoning, and establishes the ...
- 12.5k
6
votes
3
answers
292
views
Are there any philosophers who argue for a non-utilitarian moral realism from phenomenology?
What I have in mind is a non-utilitarian alternative to Sharon Hewitt Rawlette (a summary from a podcast) which would propose something like:
Morality is objective because moral facts are equally as ...
- 683
0
votes
1
answer
109
views
Why is the argument of companions in guilt in moral realism no cosidered meaningless?
The argument of Companions in guilt is meta-ethics says:
Even if there is no rational reason to think to think that something is ethical, that is irrelevant because there is no rational reason to ...
- 117
3
votes
6
answers
276
views
Why does the infamous is/ought problem fail to defeat the claim that objective morality exists?
In a comment to the question Astronomical Waste @armand put
Utilitarianism is a moral theory trying to codify "what people should do" type of questions. As such it can't really be refuted (...
- 117
0
votes
1
answer
46
views
Taxonomy of the Ethic Theories
I have read some about ethics, and I would like the most compressible possible taxonomy of ethics. Is to note that by my previous research I have identified the following dichotomies:
Dentological/...
- 196
3
votes
1
answer
65
views
Is there such a thing as a moral statement?
Logical positivists, notably A.J. Ayer, have stated that there is no such thing as a moral statement. In his example, saying the words "you acted wrongly in stealing that money" are ...
- 83
4
votes
1
answer
232
views
If moral nihilism doesn't imply right or wrong, why is the common response filled with vitriol along the lines of "you must think murder is okay"? [closed]
If nothing is right or wrong, then murder would be neither right or wrong. If you're a moral nihilist, "morality" ultimately just becomes a set of wants and a matter of preference for the ...
- 8,286
2
votes
0
answers
59
views
Nietzsche's model of sociality in the ubermensch
As I understand it, Fredrich Nietzsche-- at least in the latest works he had scribed before his death-- was neither an advocate of antisocial nor prosocial passions. How he professes this position is ...
- 21
4
votes
3
answers
137
views
Does Moore's Open Question Argument beg the question?
So as I understand, Moore's Open Question Argument can be formulated like this:
--
I. If x is the same thing as y, then the question "I know it's x, but is it y?" would be meaningless
II. ...
- 101
0
votes
0
answers
48
views
If it is possibly good that the world actually exists, is it actually good that the world possibly exists?
Note: the question involves some version/vector of the Barcan formula, albeit with the existential quantifier swapped out for an actuality operator (possibly on terms under propositions rather than ...
- 12.5k
24
votes
7
answers
3k
views
Does any philosophy designate thoughts (independent of expression or action) as a subject of morality?
Most moral philosophers consider only physical actions, speech and thoughts that may have an impact on others as within the scope of morality, while many religion believers who suppose the omniscience ...
- 413
0
votes
0
answers
65
views
Construct describing an inherent sense of right/wrong?
In Christian and especially Protestant philosophy there seems to be an implied notion that humans possess some ability to "sense" moral right and wrong. When one performs or contemplates an ...
- 360
1
vote
3
answers
232
views
Ethical evaluation of outcomes vs actions
Consider two ethical questions:
(1) Is action A more or less ethical than action B?
(2) Is outcome A more or less ethical than outcome B?
Question 1 is the focus of normative ethics. Question 2 seems ...
- 23
1
vote
1
answer
284
views
Is Utilitarianism a theory of normative ethics or meta-ethics?
I would have thought Utilitarianism should be viewed as a theory of meta-ethics. This is because, in my view, Utilitarianism addresses the issue of "what is good?" by providing a method (i.e....
- 23
8
votes
2
answers
820
views
Neo-liberalism, language and freedom?
Background
Byung Chulhan in his book psychopolitics defines freedom in two ways:
a. He defines it as an interlude which the subject feels when passing between lifestyles or ideologies. This is a ...
- 1,920
3
votes
1
answer
67
views
Gratitude without knowing for who?
Is it possible to have gratitude without a source? A simple example would be can an atheist have gratitude towards no one for the circumstances he finds himself in? I think I'm presupposing a human ...
- 1,920
2
votes
5
answers
399
views
Are love and sexual attraction completely unrelated?
The philosophy of sexuality is a more recent development. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy says:
Among the many topics explored by the philosophy of sexuality are procreation, contraception, ...
- 209
1
vote
0
answers
68
views
Could ethics be grounded in a law of nature?
Assuming that morality is objective, is it possible that the reason there are moral truths (i.e it is wrong to harm children) is because of an undiscovered law of nature (like gravity)?
- 11
0
votes
0
answers
81
views
Erotetic quantifiers?
I can't find it, but I have a distinct memory of there being an SEP article that says something like as if the ordinals were there before the sets in relation to a question about whether ordinals (or ...
- 12.5k
2
votes
0
answers
57
views
Mathematical style and ethical fictionalism
The SEP article on mathematical style got me thinking: what is the relationship between mathematical style, mathematical fictionalism, and ethical style/fictionalism? There seem to be at least three ...
- 12.5k