Questions tagged [nominalism]
Nominalism is the position that universals and/or abstract objects do not exist
36 questions
1
vote
0
answers
45
views
External truth of some sentences in first-order arithmetic
I have been pondering a way to understand semantic truth for first-order arithmetic. We know that there cannot be a decidable truth-predicate for first-order arithmetic and we also know that there ...
- 710
6
votes
2
answers
85
views
Mathematical Nominalism and Semantic Truth
I recently listened to a podcast with Jody Azzouni on the position of mathematical nominalism, a position I surprisingly have not considered until now. I have always struggled to found my conception ...
- 710
19
votes
24
answers
7k
views
Is there just one Zero?
Once i was discussing Zero with my kids, I picked up a pen and asked what it is they said 1 pen, then I kept the pen and showed them empty hand and asked how about now, they said Zero pen, then I ...
- 783
0
votes
0
answers
16
views
Nominalism and Epistemology
What would you say are the impacts of nominalism on one’s epistemology? I know that there are different strands of nominalism and we could probably nuance ourselves in to obscurity, however, I'm ...
- 45
2
votes
1
answer
60
views
Ideas and Immanent Realism
I’ve got a question that I’m hoping someone can pull the threads of in both my understanding and my line of thinking. Please understand that I’m an infant in philosophy.
Essentially, I want to ...
- 45
5
votes
2
answers
410
views
If someone doesn't believe in "the" theory of category mistakes
There are actually a bunch of these theories (per the SEP entry).1 But so suppose that one believed in no "ontological categories" at all. Or suppose someone were a skeptic about ontological ...
- 22.5k
2
votes
2
answers
97
views
Could, "If X is red, X has a coloration," possibly be not true like, "Cucumbers are vegetables," is not strictly true?
I just watched this video, I thought it was a joke video at first, but it turned out to be an explanation as to why the metaphysical concept of "vegetables" is not scientifically stable, and ...
- 22.5k
3
votes
0
answers
113
views
Reism and its proponents
Do you know some contemporary philosophers who believe in Reism or Concretism, especially the idealistic version of it?
A reist is a person who doesn't believe in
Properties
states of affairs (...
- 195
0
votes
0
answers
26
views
Arguments in favor of constituent ontology?
What is the reason for thinking that there is such a thing as proper parts and that things like properties are parts of an object. Why believe that things are metaphysically composite, let alone ...
- 383
21
votes
13
answers
12k
views
Why would infinite monkeys not produce the works of Shakespeare?
Apologies if this is a very basic/obvious question. I have no training in philosophy, but have been making my way through Peter Adamson's History of Philosophy podcast.
Recently I listened to his ...
- 313
13
votes
1
answer
2k
views
How many Platonic ideals are there?
Suppose you have an unripe banana that is yellow with a greenish tint. We could say that this banana partially embodies the platonic ideal of yellowness. We could also say that to a lesser degree it ...
- 411
3
votes
7
answers
2k
views
How do we know we've defined a thing properly when all definitions seem to have exceptions? [closed]
I don’t understand how to create definitions. Let’s take this question: “What is a woman?”
Now if I am a Platonic Idealist (or some other essentialist) then I think that all women share the same ...
- 103
3
votes
1
answer
97
views
Does nominalism about kinds/universals entail eliminativism/nihilism about ordinary objects?
If one holds a nominalist or conventionalist view of universals or kind, then do they believe that there are ordinary objects?
- 339
1
vote
1
answer
83
views
Is metaphysical nominalism essentially eliminativism?
As someone who appreciates William of Occam's eponymous legacy (as I hope most people should, whether they know it by name or not), I was reading more about his life and discovered that his other ...
- 1,468
0
votes
2
answers
298
views
Is nominalism generally considered to be disconfirmed?
In Are numbers particulars?, David Gudeman states "nominalist, which I don't think anyone is these days." I was not aware that nominalism regarding universal is generally considered to be ...
- 181
4
votes
2
answers
645
views
“Give something a name, and it becomes a thing.”
A colleague once made a comment to the effect of, "If you give something a name, it becomes a thing."
Is that a quote, or similar to a quote, from some philosophical work. If so, what is the ...
- 279
3
votes
1
answer
107
views
Do nominalists say that unicorns and married bachelors don't exist in the same way?
I'm a philosophy novice that's trying to wrap my head around nominalism. In my current thinking there is a big difference between two categories of things that don't exist: non-actual concepts and ...
- 1,807
3
votes
2
answers
336
views
Why should we care about the Platonism vs. nominalism debate?
I understand the debate to be about whether abstract concepts actually "exist". As such, it is clearly an important question for ontology.
However, I fail to see any practical reason to care ...
- 696
1
vote
1
answer
112
views
Mathematical nominalists and realists on "there are at least as many possible intentional states as mathematical objects"?
I think this can be meaningfully asked. Intentional states
**Ideally I'm asking this about: mathematical nominalists, constructivists, intuitionists, and realists (and ideally I'd ask this about ...
- 3,521
6
votes
3
answers
366
views
Did Gödel think certain math could only be understood if platonism is correct? (and correspondence and nominalism)
I’m reading Shapiro’s Thinking About Mathematics, and there’s a quote by Godel which I would like to fully understand, both his intended meaning and how it’s viewed in the wider context of mathematics,...
- 3,521
10
votes
3
answers
515
views
Do realists and nominalists actually disagree about what really is, or do they just disagree about words?
So I am reading Loux's contemporary introduction to metaphysics, and he starts by giving two broad ideas about universals.
Do realists and nominalists actually disagree about what really is? For ...
- 386
1
vote
4
answers
241
views
Is this a type of nominalism?
Abstract entities do not exist, but their absences from each other, do, concretely. Is that a type of nominalism?
So the numbers five and four do not exist, but four not being five, is a concrete (I ...
user62233
2
votes
1
answer
105
views
Is the Problem of Universals still a prominent topic of debate?
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy includes an entry for the Medieval version of the debate of universals, but not for anything contemporary. There's an entry on universals in the Internet ...
- 41
4
votes
2
answers
393
views
What is the meaning of Principle C'' in Hartry Field's 'Science Without Numbers'?
For Field, the following is 'perfectly obvious', but I would like confirmation that I understand it completely.
Let A be a nominalistically statable assertion.
Let A* be the assertion that results by ...
- 71
1
vote
0
answers
101
views
Do nominalists predicate everything equivocally?
Do nominalists predicate everything equivocally?
Equivocal predication is when only the name is common between two things, for example: "bark" in tree bark and dog's bark.
- 8,615
2
votes
0
answers
57
views
Are "univerals" created? Do they evolve?
I've come across the philosophical debate about "universals" versus "particulars". On the one hand, some believe there are no universals, only particulars (nominalists). On the other hand, there are ...
- 988
-1
votes
3
answers
216
views
Nominalistically Finding Radioactive Half-Life?
In Science Without Numbers by Hartry Field he talks about stating things nominalistically. What seemed obvious to me is "How would you find radioactive half-life without math?". I looked all around ...
- 344
2
votes
1
answer
146
views
On the universal and preconception in stoic logic: the word "natural" (naturale) from Diog. L., VII, 54
Foreword: as an Italian student, I hope that I will not make many mistakes in translating the lexicon from my native language to English; sometimes this will happen, and so putting the Italian word in ...
user35385
7
votes
2
answers
879
views
Realist vs Nominalist views of empirical data
I was recently intrigued by this passage regarding time-series data from The Grammar of Graphics, section 3.2:
Among the many prevailing views of the role of empirical data in
modern science, ...
- 279
4
votes
3
answers
658
views
Can nominalists believe in their own death?
Can nominalists believe in their own death? You often hear people talk about death as nothing-ness, which suggests a universal nothing. And nominalists say that universals do not exist.
Just trying ...
- 49
3
votes
2
answers
445
views
If mathematical platonism is true, is mathematics then a discovery?
A perennial meta-mathematical question is whether mathematics is an invention or a discovery.
If mathematical platonism is true, it means that mathematical concepts exist as ideas, and therefore, or ...
- 48.8k
1
vote
1
answer
365
views
What have been the major achievements in the debate regarding platonism and nominalism?
I have read some of the philosophies on either side of the argument, but lack the historical overview to really get a picture of the main achievements chronologically. I'm taking nominalism to mean ...
- 141
3
votes
3
answers
132
views
Is nominalism to assert something is only what we call it?
Is the following concise definition of nominalism correct:
Nominalism is to assert something is only what we call it.
?
Or are there problems with it?
- 8,615
2
votes
4
answers
983
views
How is nominalism different to universalism?
I wonder how this would be best explained to the public without prior knowledge (such myself).
We have on one side the contradiction between e.g. the general or abstract “(being) yellow” vs “yellow ...
- 691
2
votes
0
answers
99
views
Nominalist views and contradictions
Given a flavor of nominalism which denies that simple sentences and existential quantifiers referring to mathematical objects are literally true (pretense theory, fictionalism, figuralism, etc.), ...
- 135
6
votes
1
answer
326
views
Can nominalist logicians reject universals but accept universal statements?
I am aware that Nominalism comes in at least two flavors, one in particular is the denial of universals. Under this paradigm of Nominalsim, is it possible for a mathematician or even a logician to be ...
- 347