Questions tagged [ontology]
Ontology is the study of the nature of being, existence or reality as such, as well as the basic categories of being and their relations.
753
questions
1
vote
0
answers
28
views
Do models of Cartesian closed logic physically exist?
Cartesian closed logics, also known as simple type theories or simply-typed lambda calculi, are ubiquitous; we use sentential logic (WP, nLab) all the time in philosophy and law, and doxastic logic to ...
- 205
2
votes
1
answer
34
views
Ontology over time
Looking for any recommended references for this topic, I was recommended a good book on logic previously on here, and found it extremely enlightening, mainly how we deal with issues like the ship of ...
- 1,019
6
votes
2
answers
336
views
Ontic structural realism: what's the difference between 'structures are all there is' and 'all there is are structures'?
I'm a physics student reading a philosophy essay about ontic structural realism and quantum field theory. In that paper, the author presented ontic structural realism(OSR) and radical ontic structural ...
- 163
0
votes
3
answers
67
views
Traditionally in philosophy, anything that can be said to be is a being
True or false? Does this mean that tables and chairs, rivers and rocks, by virtue of the fact that they exist, can be called 'beings'?
- 422
1
vote
0
answers
47
views
Can 'change' be treated as the replacement of one inert object with another? [duplicate]
I was reading about how the english language has 'changed' and 'developed' over time, and this has me wonder, what makes the 'English' Language what it is? If we define a language as a set of formulas ...
- 1,019
6
votes
6
answers
931
views
How can we denote objects that no longer exist?
This is a question more about how we can discuss about objects which no longer exist. For example, let's say that Socrates no longer exists (ignore any religious side of this and consider Socrates as ...
- 1,019
0
votes
3
answers
56
views
Is a 'group of people' a concrete or abstract entity?
Let's say I have a 'group of people', let's call it 'Group A'. Group A consists of people (concrete) suggesting it is concrete, yet any member of Group A can be at any place in the world, and their ...
- 1,019
1
vote
0
answers
21
views
HEIDEGGER SCHOLARS NOMENCLATURE PUZZLING
Heideggerian scholars keep utilizing the phrase "background practices" as a substitute or equivalent for being.
Background practices are things like instinctive social behavior that is ...
- 19
4
votes
2
answers
184
views
What does it mean for two properties of objects to be of the same class (or even identical)?
For people adhering to a realist ontology, what does it mean for you to say that a property p of an object of species a, and a property q of an object b are of the same class, or even that are ...
0
votes
4
answers
671
views
Does omniscience necessarily entail omnipotence?
Suppose an existing being has its existence in danger, but miraculously becomes omniscient, could this being save its existence? Or is there any case where this is impossible?
My main motivation for ...
- 121
3
votes
2
answers
58
views
Using 'numbers' in natural language
Typically in natural language we will say something like 'I have two' to denote a group of two things, obviously using the 'mathematical' view of numbers as an abstract object with well defined 'names'...
- 1,019
1
vote
0
answers
53
views
What did Kant have to say about atomism?
I've been trying to understand whether on not Kant accepts the atomic model (that matter is composed of smallest pieces) based on his writings in Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.
- 111
0
votes
1
answer
49
views
Do all nouns denote, or only proper nouns?
By 'denote' I mean they are used specifically to denote objects, in almost all times they are used, for example most proper nouns like 'James' or 'Lithuania' or 'Paris'.
Many common nouns are generic ...
- 1,019
0
votes
2
answers
46
views
Existence in logic vs existence in reality
Take an object which has been destroyed, we can talk about it in the past tense, how does this work logically, can we talk about objects which previously existed (in the physical sense)? For the ...
- 1,019
3
votes
6
answers
159
views
Markus Gabriel's conception of thinking as a sense
⚠ It doesn't make much sense to answer this question if you are not acquainted with Gabriel's work and do not even read the linked interview.
I always thought that common sense is fundamentally ...
- 4,275
3
votes
1
answer
105
views
Is the multiverse standpoint in set theory "ideologically committed" to plural quantification over universes/axioms?
One of the ways in which Hamkins expresses the multiverse standpoint is as the assertion that there is no "absolute background concept of sets or even ordinals." He spells out examples of ...
- 7,108
2
votes
0
answers
83
views
Do things correspond to carvings of reality?
I have found many papers about “carving reality at its joints” but all of them discussed carving reality into kinds, supposed to cluster things, themselves always considered as already given. Though I ...
- 51
-1
votes
1
answer
61
views
Are artworks created or discovered?
I am trying to deny Joseph Margolis' argument that pieces of art are not 'universals'. Particularly, I want to say that types (in the tokens-of-a-type sense) are essentially the same thing as ...
- 1
3
votes
2
answers
169
views
Is moral responsibility consistent from an ontological perspective of change?
Let a being be arbitrary, suppose that this being has the capacity to be morally responsible.
(EDIT 2) Regardless of group morality, but assume this being is in a moral environment with no moral ...
- 121
2
votes
0
answers
48
views
Markus Gabriel's ontology and the non-existence of the world
Markus Gabriel proposes a permissive ontology ("New Realism") according to, if there exists a certain "field of sense" in which an entity appears, the entity exists. Even fictional ...
- 4,275
1
vote
2
answers
73
views
What differs an entity from a sequence contaning only this entity?
I was thinking about whether there is a difference between the symbol 'x' and the expression/formula containing it.
For example we discuss 'x' the symbol but equally I can talk about 'x' the ...
- 1,019
5
votes
2
answers
650
views
What is the distinction between Gegenstand and Objekt?
In German philosophy (particularly Kant and Husserl), the concepts Gegenstand and Objekt (and their conjugations Gegenständlichkeit and Objektivität) are used to describe very different things while ...
- 51
0
votes
2
answers
85
views
Misleading language and ontology
Does natural language suggest a different ontological status to different things? I have noticed in our natural language we like to pluralise things sometimes in a way I disagree with. For example, a '...
- 1,019
1
vote
0
answers
52
views
Aristotle on Plato's realm of forms
I am familiar with Plato's realm of forms. However, I have not read much of Aristotle except for the Nicomachean Ethics. In a nutshell, how does Aristotle pick up on Plato's forms and where would I ...
user63528
2
votes
2
answers
62
views
Is a complex eternal first cause less likely than a simple eternal first cause?
I have seen this argument posed by people like Dawkins et. al, but is this actually true? Many have pointed to how complex things in nature generally come from simpler origins, but clearly, this isn't ...
- 2,562
2
votes
0
answers
38
views
Positive vs negative classes in ontology
I am interested in the nature of ontological classification and whether there exists some form of accepted terminology to distinguish classes that are 'positive' (matching characteristics) and classes ...
- 121
2
votes
1
answer
91
views
Physical location of abstract objects
I was reading about the idea of a specific colour as an abstract object as defined by Plato, and how in 'Parmenides' he struggled with the fact that the type cannot be single and exist in multiple ...
- 1,019
1
vote
2
answers
111
views
What is an instance?
I see the definition of 'instances' and it makes sense when dealing with types that define physical objects, so any cat is an instance of the type 'cat', however, why do we discuss 'instances' of ...
- 1,019
0
votes
0
answers
108
views
Identity of mathematical objects
Leibniz law's states that if A and B have the same properties then A and B are one and the same, however we can consider mathematical objects that are isomoprhic but not identitical, they have the ...
- 1,019
1
vote
0
answers
97
views
Is 'a level of quantity' a poor definition of 'real number'?
I was thinking about how we define numbers with respect to their uses, and came up with the definition of 'a level of quantity' which can have a different physical consequence for each quantity ...
- 1,019
1
vote
3
answers
90
views
Could I (or something like my mind) exist because more complicated (mental) products than me exist?
Starting with a Cartesian-type 'cogito' argument, we might be sceptical that an 'I' exists, but rather suppose that we're embedded in a kind of perceptive process allowing us to experience thoughts, ...
- 21
-1
votes
1
answer
98
views
Relationship between real quantities and numbers [closed]
Is there a definition of the relationship between real quantities and the numbers we relate to them, generally we use 'numbers' as mathematical objects with a 'proper' nouns, but we associate them ...
- 1,019
0
votes
0
answers
33
views
Can a blind metaphysical will have knowledge?
Copleston stated of Schopenhauer's notion of a metaphysically "blind" will:
"If the Will is blind it cannot know itself either directly or through the phenomenon, while, if it is the ...
- 127
3
votes
5
answers
156
views
Is being non existent the same as being zero in quantity
For instance,
There does not exist unicorn on earth. There are zero unicorns on earth.
How are these two different?
One could argue being zero in quantity is a temporal property. The number may change ...
4
votes
5
answers
819
views
How does entropy explain consciousness and the forward direction of time?
How does entropy explain consciousness and the forward direction of time? I was told that entropy is the increasing of disorderliness and that consciousness cannot exist as memory increases when ...
- 2,086
1
vote
2
answers
83
views
Sets vs 'association'
I previously asked whether abstract objects can be split into categories, groups or sets of their component parts, and was told, definitely, and later another question occurred to me, take an ...
- 1,019
3
votes
3
answers
120
views
Can an 'abstract object' be a collection of constituent parts?
When I ask this, the use of collection or set is not necessarily 'mathematical', so if in this case I mean a collection of ideas that encapsulate it, 'make up' the idea in the same way the various ...
- 1,019
0
votes
0
answers
29
views
Can 'collections' be 'objects'?
Most things we call 'objects' are generally made up of other 'objects' can we consider a collection, such as a physical collection of objects as an 'object' itself?
If we have a 'collection' or an ...
- 1,019
0
votes
1
answer
70
views
Physical vs abstract collections
In mathematics we deal with 'sets' they are abstract as the objects in them are abstract, they have no tempo-spatial location. How about standard 'collections' we would encounter in real life, if I ...
- 1,019
3
votes
2
answers
43
views
Drawing a distinction between a 'type', the set of it's tokens
If we take an abstract 'type' like 'man', this type sort of defines the required characteristics to be 'a man', however what is the difference between the type 'man' and the group/set of 'men'?
For ...
- 1,019
3
votes
2
answers
119
views
Is Heidegger's "Being" a class template or a random variable taking realizations?
I have a fairly strong background in math and programming as it is my daily work. I have recently started getting interested in philosophy and often has the habit of drawing analogy between ...
- 131
3
votes
2
answers
105
views
Given a positive ontological claim X, is not-X the default position?
Given a positive ontological claim X, I see at least four different subjective positions one could adopt regarding X:
I believe that the evidence provides persuasive reason to believe that X is true (...
user48437
3
votes
1
answer
56
views
Is Ontological Parsimony true when it comes to fundamental reality?
When people talk about ontological parsimony, it is generally used to add or subtract credibility from a theory about what exists 'within' the universe or multiverse. For example, it's used to discuss ...
- 31
2
votes
3
answers
94
views
What is an object's properties?
What can we consider an object's properties, for example, when can we consider an object's properties as 'changing'? For example, if I move an object from my desk to my table, has it changed? If I ...
- 1,019
3
votes
2
answers
87
views
If there was something else that's as fundamental other than time or space in a different universe, dimension, would we be able to conceptualize it? [closed]
If there was something else that's as fundamental other than time or space in a different universe, dimension, would we be able to conceptualize it?
Because language can only refer to something we've ...
- 2,086
1
vote
1
answer
71
views
Is reality a matter of perspective?
Imagine a world like the movie The Matrix where everything people experience is controlled by a massive computer. Let us assume that in this virtual world, there are ogres but no gorillas. Consider ...
- 4,674
1
vote
2
answers
62
views
Abstract objects and changing properties
I like to use This website to explain some of the simple ways of mathematical thinking, but in the linked article by Wells, he gives his ideas on how mathematical objects are inert, but in this he ...
- 1,019
2
votes
3
answers
173
views
What do we explictly refer to in mathematical expressios
My friend has a theory about 'instantiation' of numbers, they believe that every time we think of a number we create an 'instance' of it in our own heads, it's the same idea, but each time we think, ...
- 1,019
3
votes
3
answers
95
views
How do essentialists deal with fuzzy essential properties?
I've been reading a collection of essays on neo-Aristotelianism where they endorse the concept of essential properties. An essential property is an ontological concept, not a conceptual concept. The ...
- 4,674
4
votes
2
answers
169
views
Why should we care about the Platonism vs. nominalism debate?
I understand the debate to be about whether abstract concepts actually "exist". As such, it is clearly an important question for ontology.
However, I fail to see any practical reason to care ...
- 656