Questions tagged [ontology]

Ontology is the study of the nature of being, existence or reality as such, as well as the basic categories of being and their relations.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
2 answers
97 views

If there was something else that's as fundamental other than time or space in a different universe, dimension, would we be able to conceptualize it? [closed]

If there was something else that's as fundamental other than time or space in a different universe, dimension, would we be able to conceptualize it? Because language can only refer to something we've ...
Sayaman's user avatar
  • 4,019
2 votes
1 answer
64 views

Is there a resource cataloguing unique and fundamental concepts cross-culturally?

I am working on a "conlang", which is basically a fantasy language. I have collected 4,000-ish words in their "base" form (some we still need to find the base for, but they can be ...
Lance's user avatar
  • 227
2 votes
3 answers
140 views

Is there a logical reason to default to a certain type of first cause?

While there are some exceptions, physics generally holds that the universe has a beginning. Assuming that there is a first cause of the universe, what are the logical based reasons for preferring ...
Joseph Hirsch's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
215 views

Are we still in God's mind?

I would like to share a reasoning. We consider that an Engineer, before starting to build his project, draws up a construction plan. In the case of a Deity that promises eternal life in paradise, we ...
Gnai Hari's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
205 views

Why does a hypothesis not self-defeat under fallacy of the gaps?

I was listening to an atheism-vs-theism debate on YouTube, and the two debaters came to a disagreement when talking about God of the Gaps. Person A: "If we look at all the evidence, we can see ...
Noah's user avatar
  • 592
2 votes
1 answer
499 views

Why did Berkeley denounce 'abstract' ideas?

George Berkeley- Berkeley is best known for his early works on vision (An Essay towards a New Theory of Vision, 1709) and metaphysics (A Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, 1710; ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
562 views

How did Bertrand Russell distinguish between being and existence?

In his book, "Principles of Mathematics", Russell makes the following claim: Being is that which belongs to every conceivable term, to every possible object, of thought-in short to everything that ...
Amy's user avatar
  • 61
2 votes
2 answers
426 views

Does Bostrom's simulation argument make sense?

Bostrom has famously argued that we live in a simulation. One of his key assumptions is that other civilizations exist that can simulate us. Why do we make this assumption? Why assume that other ...
Josh's user avatar
  • 355
2 votes
1 answer
534 views

Questions on non-ontology

Ontology is one of the best known and most important branches of metaphysics - the study of "things", of "beings", or of "what there is" (in oppose to what "there isn't"). I have a few questions ...
Yechiam Weiss's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
435 views

Should it be the String Hypothesis rather than String Theory?

The question here is what is signified by the lexical token 'theory' in String Theory. It's something of a rhetorical question because it is, I think, used in a special sense by physicists; for ...
Mozibur Ullah's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
374 views

Ontology: How do ideas exist?

There are several ways of looking at ideas. There is a platonic way of looking at ideas which sees the ideas as kind eternal entities. Augustine puts these ideas in the mind of God. In either case ...
St.Clair Bij's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
385 views

Can an infinite be undifferentiated?

Starting in amthematics: The infinite in mathematics must be differentiated: we have the sequence - 0,1,2,3...; where each number is distinct. The same goes for infinite ordinals and cardinals. ...
Mozibur Ullah's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
61 views

Qs about interpretations on Parmenides's claim

Parmenides's classic claim is that what does not exist cannot be thought about. (It has been read as a claim that every truth-bearer must have a truth-maker, since otherwise the truth-bearer is not ...
Melpomene's user avatar
  • 127
2 votes
2 answers
307 views

Whn Badiou asserts that mathematics is Ontology what does he mean by Ontology?

Badious oeuvre can be succintly phrased in his slogan: mathematic is ontology. Mathematics I understand. So the question really is the other part of his slogan. I take his 'is' to be normal and ...
Mozibur Ullah's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
155 views

Numbers and Time

This is my first post on philosophy stack exchange, so I apologize in advance if this question is not well-defined or if it happens to be a duplicate. If so, feel free to link the corresponding post(s)...
John Smith's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
109 views

How would Heidegger criticize Descartes' melting candle analogy?

I've recently finished reading Being and Time and have attempted to supplement my understanding with different takes on the piece. One interesting angle that I've mused upon myself but haven't seen in ...
Arash Howaida's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
83 views

How many isolated concept clusters are there?

Let me start by explaining what I mean by an isolated concept cluster. It is often remarked that you can't define any moral term without using other moral terms. For example, you can define obligation ...
David Gudeman's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
120 views

Physical location of abstract objects

I was reading about the idea of a specific colour as an abstract object as defined by Plato, and how in 'Parmenides' he struggled with the fact that the type cannot be single and exist in multiple ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,171
2 votes
1 answer
126 views

Philosophy of information question on the nature of computation

What is the most general definition of computation, and how does it differ from the more common definitions of it? What is the most general definition of computation and how does it differ from the ...
Sayaman's user avatar
  • 4,019
2 votes
1 answer
100 views

How does Epictetus define personhood?

In the Enchiridion, Epictetus says: “Our master is anyone who has the power to implement or prevent the things that we want or don’t want. Whoever wants to be free, therefore, should wish for nothing ...
Trade2NobleLife's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
71 views

In What Sense is Substance Epistemically Prior?

In Metaphysics Z (1028a32), Aristotle outlines different senses in which a substance can be considered to be "first": there are several senses in which a thing is said to be first; yet substance is ...
Moritz Loritz's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
2k views

Conceptual distinction between " strength" , " force" and " power"?

Philosophers distinguish between 2 kinds of " powers": moral powers ( authority, right to order something) which corresponds to potestas in Latin and " physical power" ( ability to do something, or to ...
user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
117 views

Ontology in the Nietzschean framework

Would you say that Nietzsche held any regard to the ontological question in his work? I know more or less his account on metaphysics, he seem to push the question aside as he considers it does not fit ...
Gloserio's user avatar
  • 265
2 votes
2 answers
282 views

Does anyone consider Being a primitive, unanalyzable, term?

Does anyone say that Being is a primitive, unanalyzable, term? That probably would make Being and Time the greatest work of nonsense of all time. I certainly feel able to imagine that Being is ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
167 views

Ontology : being and kinds of being [closed]

Can we study being without making reference to kinds of being or the being of entities ? Can we identify pure being? Heidegger apparently thought we could and should. Did he really think this ? If so,...
Larry's user avatar
  • 21
2 votes
2 answers
332 views

Monads, souls and rational souls

Leibniz defines monads as simple substances with no parts (Monadology, 1). Later on, we learn that some of those are souls which have memory (Monadology 19) and further others are rational souls ...
Hasan Mert YILDIRIM's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
239 views

What would be the correct abstraction for Thing and Action?

In an hierargical ontology definition I'm stating that: Artist <= Person <= Human <= Mamal <= Thing or Phone <= Product <= Thing. I could also do the same for Walking <= Moving &...
Bob van Luijt's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
338 views

Is Reality an intersection of Incompatible Ontologies?

Empiricists do not ask questions about the ontological status of mathematical or logical structures. Idealists don't explain how Ideas are developed, or how technological advancement in general takes ...
christo183's user avatar
  • 2,447
2 votes
2 answers
81 views

Absolutes within modern philosophy

Are there any philosophies still claiming the existence of Absolute entities? By Absolute, I mean permanent and independent of cause and effect, such as Plato's One or Forms in general.
Ilya Grushevskiy's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
231 views

Could someone help me out with Quine's theory of ontological commitment?

I'm kind of struggling with this. My prof gave an example of the problem of whether or not holes exist. In the case of a colander, a realist about holes could say that a colander is metal that has ...
LootHypothesis's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
117 views

What is property?

Suppose , I have two objects A and B. A has a set of properties P and B has a set of properties Q. It is possible that when I combine A and B the combination has a property c that is neither in P nor ...
Ahmed Abdullah's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
101 views

Language to describe that which is most fundamentally real

I'm trying to articulate my perception of reality for a blog post. Core to the clarity of this post is that it successfully transmit a certain very deep and abstract notion. I struggle to convey this ...
theideasmith's user avatar
2 votes
4 answers
250 views

Can a tool use itself?

I ask this question with connections to consciousness. It seems neuroscience has hit a plateau in explaining it materially since the smallest element of consciousness in the material brain seems to be ...
Anoop Alex's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
322 views

What type of questions can we ask? (When, where etc)

About the question So, by 'type of questions', I really mean this from an ontological perspective. I imagine there is a complete set of (type of) questions, and thus any question that ever was or will ...
user2901512's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
137 views

Does Aristotle have anything to say about the interpretative paradoxes of QM?

This follows this question The same question, angled a little differently suggests a family resemblence with the measurement paradox in QM: First and most broadly, QM is standardly said to have an ...
Mozibur Ullah's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
138 views

Must existence be a property, for bundle theory to work?

Kant argued that existence isn't a predicate; and presumably a similar argument would show that it is neither a property. But if ontologically we believe all that there is are bundles of properties; ...
Mozibur Ullah's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
96 views

Which scholars argue that for art to be art, it must be for art's sake?

I understand this is partially supported by Nietzsche, but do others agree or adamantly disagree with this position? If so who?
alfonso's user avatar
  • 341
2 votes
5 answers
111 views

What's the difference between noneism and abstractionism?

I know what noneists and abstractionists say the difference is, I just don't grasp the difference. Noneism and abstractionism are two approaches to objects like numbers, fictional character, ...
David Gudeman's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
114 views

Can only one object exist?

Suppose so, then: What exactly can distinguish it from not existing, if the object itself is all there is? Any object trivially maps to itself via identity, so in order to deviate from the trivial ...
Myers Hertz's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
68 views

Did Spinoza say "to name it is to limit it"?

I have seen this quote attributed second-hand and I wonder if anyone can document its source. Greatly appreciated.
Dagwood's user avatar
  • 21
2 votes
1 answer
100 views

If a statement and its negation are in-principle-indistinguishable empirically, can it mean anything at all?

There exists a category of syntactically valid declarative statements which appear intuitively like they are descriptions of reality - but which no possible measurement could distinguish from their ...
g s's user avatar
  • 5,875
2 votes
1 answer
90 views

What do materialists mean by 'material' ? Is it matter ? Is it energy ? What is our evidence for its existence? [closed]

Overview of relevant material views. Evidence for existence of this material. Role of the observer.
oTTo's user avatar
  • 39
2 votes
1 answer
77 views

Do models of Cartesian closed logic physically exist?

Cartesian closed logics, also known as simple type theories or simply-typed lambda calculi, are ubiquitous; we use sentential logic (WP, nLab) all the time in philosophy and law, and doxastic logic to ...
Corbin's user avatar
  • 1,001
2 votes
1 answer
83 views

Ontology over time

Looking for any recommended references for this topic, I was recommended a good book on logic previously on here, and found it extremely enlightening, mainly how we deal with issues like the ship of ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,171
2 votes
3 answers
102 views

Is a complex eternal first cause less likely than a simple eternal first cause?

I have seen this argument posed by people like Dawkins et. al, but is this actually true? Many have pointed to how complex things in nature generally come from simpler origins, but clearly, this isn't ...
user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
110 views

Could I (or something like my mind) exist because more complicated (mental) products than me exist?

Starting with a Cartesian-type 'cogito' argument, we might be sceptical that an 'I' exists, but rather suppose that we're embedded in a kind of perceptive process allowing us to experience thoughts, ...
WG82's user avatar
  • 31
2 votes
2 answers
134 views

Physical vs abstract collections

In mathematics we deal with 'sets' they are abstract as the objects in them are abstract, they have no tempo-spatial location. How about standard 'collections' we would encounter in real life, if I ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,171
2 votes
1 answer
140 views

Is Ontological Parsimony true when it comes to fundamental reality?

When people talk about ontological parsimony, it is generally used to add or subtract credibility from a theory about what exists 'within' the universe or multiverse. For example, it's used to discuss ...
Cat Rat Pup's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
157 views

Discerning between a number 'x' as a Natural or Real number

The usual way of teaching is to explain the numbers that are element of the reals and naturals as being the same, this was a perfectly valid way of understanding for me, why do some consider '2' as an ...
user37577's user avatar
  • 121
2 votes
7 answers
351 views

Applying logic to the question of whether all of existence is infinite or not

Here, I use to exist as generally as possible; if it is an object, it exists; if it is conceivable, it exists; if it is anything, it exists; even the properties and relations themselves exist. ...
user110391's user avatar

1
7 8
9
10 11
17