Questions tagged [ontology]

Ontology is the study of the nature of being, existence or reality as such, as well as the basic categories of being and their relations.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
4 votes
4 answers
434 views

Speaking what is not = speaking about non-being?

In Plato's The Sophist, a stranger from Elea argues with Theaetetus, a young friend of Socrates, about the definition of "sophist". They come to the conclusion that the sophist imitates the ...
viuser's user avatar
  • 4,415
2 votes
1 answer
75 views

What do materialists mean by 'material' ? Is it matter ? Is it energy ? What is our evidence for its existence? [closed]

Overview of relevant material views. Evidence for existence of this material. Role of the observer.
oTTo's user avatar
  • 39
3 votes
2 answers
80 views

Regarding objects being concrete and properties being abstract

For those who believe that objects are concrete things and properties are abstract things, what do you make of sensory properties? Our brains perceive sensory qualities first and build (concepts of) &...
csp's user avatar
  • 362
3 votes
3 answers
135 views

What does existence correspond to outside of human consciousness? [closed]

The existence of something is a purely human concept. What does it correspond to outside of human consciousness?
Arman Armenpress's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
72 views

How many isolated concept clusters are there?

Let me start by explaining what I mean by an isolated concept cluster. It is often remarked that you can't define any moral term without using other moral terms. For example, you can define obligation ...
David Gudeman's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
71 views

How can universal truths lead to particular truths?

Disclaimer: I have not read philosophy outside of limited Greek works So, Plato theorized that there was a world of "universals" and "particulars", the world of general principles (...
Dusty574's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
21 views

Can we critique Ontological Arguments by attacking their usage of the mind/language only?

Couldn’t we critique Ontological Arguments’ compatibility with the concept of God by suggesting that an omnipotent being should be able to be proved by something outside of the mind, or something ...
sket's user avatar
  • 73
4 votes
4 answers
528 views

Quine-Putnam indispensability argument

If Quine-Putnam's argument is (following the SEP): (P1) We ought to have ontological commitment to all and only the entities that are indispensable to our best scientific theories. (P2) Mathematical ...
Frank's user avatar
  • 2,346
2 votes
4 answers
89 views

Location of the sky (universe) according to Aristotle

Aristotle wrote in his Physics: The earth is in the water, the water is in the air, the air is in the ether, the ether is in the sky, and the sky is no longer in anything else. Do you agree with ...
ggk hj's user avatar
  • 101
2 votes
3 answers
119 views

Identification of light with existence and darkness with non-existence [closed]

Is it true that in ancient times many thinkers identified light with existence (essence), and darkness with non-existence? Examples include Pythagoreanism, Neoplatonism, the ontology of light as-...
ggk hj's user avatar
  • 101
0 votes
0 answers
52 views

Introductory texts to formal ontology and mereology?

I’m a grad student of Mathematics, doing research in Formal Semantics (a topic in Computational Linguistics) and some of my more tangential reading has made me privy to the existence of formal ...
m. lekk's user avatar
  • 109
1 vote
1 answer
61 views

Where does this concept of existence fall?

In exploring the questions of existence, I came to this concept. I am curious if anyone has any feedback or can point me to any other materials or ideas that relate to this? I am sure I am not the ...
abstruse reality 's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
53 views

How does Hegel's Ontology overcome issues in Spinoza's?

I'm trying to write a paper and I've tried to reconstruct an argument about this on my own with no luck so far. It's about Hegel's criticism of Spinoza. As far as I understand, Hegel's main critique ...
KaiGuyMBK's user avatar
  • 131
1 vote
0 answers
33 views

Do models of Cartesian closed logic physically exist?

Cartesian closed logics, also known as simple type theories or simply-typed lambda calculi, are ubiquitous; we use sentential logic (WP, nLab) all the time in philosophy and law, and doxastic logic to ...
Corbin's user avatar
  • 289
2 votes
1 answer
58 views

Ontology over time

Looking for any recommended references for this topic, I was recommended a good book on logic previously on here, and found it extremely enlightening, mainly how we deal with issues like the ship of ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
6 votes
2 answers
358 views

Ontic structural realism: what's the difference between 'structures are all there is' and 'all there is are structures'?

I'm a physics student reading a philosophy essay about ontic structural realism and quantum field theory. In that paper, the author presented ontic structural realism(OSR) and radical ontic structural ...
IGY's user avatar
  • 163
0 votes
3 answers
71 views

Traditionally in philosophy, anything that can be said to be is a being

True or false? Does this mean that tables and chairs, rivers and rocks, by virtue of the fact that they exist, can be called 'beings'?
Wayfarer's user avatar
  • 529
1 vote
0 answers
47 views

Can 'change' be treated as the replacement of one inert object with another? [duplicate]

I was reading about how the english language has 'changed' and 'developed' over time, and this has me wonder, what makes the 'English' Language what it is? If we define a language as a set of formulas ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
6 votes
6 answers
947 views

How can we denote objects that no longer exist?

This is a question more about how we can discuss about objects which no longer exist. For example, let's say that Socrates no longer exists (ignore any religious side of this and consider Socrates as ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
0 votes
3 answers
58 views

Is a 'group of people' a concrete or abstract entity?

Let's say I have a 'group of people', let's call it 'Group A'. Group A consists of people (concrete) suggesting it is concrete, yet any member of Group A can be at any place in the world, and their ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
1 vote
0 answers
27 views

HEIDEGGER SCHOLARS NOMENCLATURE PUZZLING

Heideggerian scholars keep utilizing the phrase "background practices" as a substitute or equivalent for being. Background practices are things like instinctive social behavior that is ...
richard's user avatar
  • 19
4 votes
2 answers
192 views

What does it mean for two properties of objects to be of the same class (or even identical)?

For people adhering to a realist ontology, what does it mean for you to say that a property p of an object of species a, and a property q of an object b are of the same class, or even that are ...
Brian Díaz Flores's user avatar
1 vote
4 answers
693 views

Does omniscience necessarily entail omnipotence?

Suppose an existing being has its existence in danger, but miraculously becomes omniscient, could this being save its existence? Or is there any case where this is impossible? My main motivation for ...
random_user's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
58 views

Using 'numbers' in natural language

Typically in natural language we will say something like 'I have two' to denote a group of two things, obviously using the 'mathematical' view of numbers as an abstract object with well defined 'names'...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
1 vote
0 answers
58 views

What did Kant have to say about atomism?

I've been trying to understand whether on not Kant accepts the atomic model (that matter is composed of smallest pieces) based on his writings in Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.
Sven's user avatar
  • 111
0 votes
1 answer
52 views

Do all nouns denote, or only proper nouns?

By 'denote' I mean they are used specifically to denote objects, in almost all times they are used, for example most proper nouns like 'James' or 'Lithuania' or 'Paris'. Many common nouns are generic ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
0 votes
2 answers
51 views

Existence in logic vs existence in reality

Take an object which has been destroyed, we can talk about it in the past tense, how does this work logically, can we talk about objects which previously existed (in the physical sense)? For the ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
3 votes
6 answers
179 views

Markus Gabriel's conception of thinking as a sense

⚠ It doesn't make much sense to answer this question if you are not acquainted with Gabriel's work and do not even read the linked interview. I always thought that common sense is fundamentally ...
viuser's user avatar
  • 4,415
3 votes
1 answer
117 views

Is the multiverse standpoint in set theory "ideologically committed" to plural quantification over universes/axioms?

One of the ways in which Hamkins expresses the multiverse standpoint is as the assertion that there is no "absolute background concept of sets or even ordinals." He spells out examples of ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
85 views

Do things correspond to carvings of reality?

I have found many papers about “carving reality at its joints” but all of them discussed carving reality into kinds, supposed to cluster things, themselves always considered as already given. Though I ...
Georges's user avatar
  • 51
-1 votes
1 answer
68 views

Are artworks created or discovered?

I am trying to deny Joseph Margolis' argument that pieces of art are not 'universals'. Particularly, I want to say that types (in the tokens-of-a-type sense) are essentially the same thing as ...
Shay's user avatar
  • 1
3 votes
2 answers
174 views

Is moral responsibility consistent from an ontological perspective of change?

Let a being be arbitrary, suppose that this being has the capacity to be morally responsible. (EDIT 2) Regardless of group morality, but assume this being is in a moral environment with no moral ...
random_user's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
52 views

Markus Gabriel's ontology and the non-existence of the world

Markus Gabriel proposes a permissive ontology ("New Realism") according to, if there exists a certain "field of sense" in which an entity appears, the entity exists. Even fictional ...
viuser's user avatar
  • 4,415
1 vote
2 answers
73 views

What differs an entity from a sequence contaning only this entity?

I was thinking about whether there is a difference between the symbol 'x' and the expression/formula containing it. For example we discuss 'x' the symbol but equally I can talk about 'x' the ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
5 votes
2 answers
733 views

What is the distinction between Gegenstand and Objekt?

In German philosophy (particularly Kant and Husserl), the concepts Gegenstand and Objekt (and their conjugations Gegenständlichkeit and Objektivität) are used to describe very different things while ...
Faunadestia's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
86 views

Misleading language and ontology

Does natural language suggest a different ontological status to different things? I have noticed in our natural language we like to pluralise things sometimes in a way I disagree with. For example, a '...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
1 vote
0 answers
56 views

Aristotle on Plato's realm of forms

I am familiar with Plato's realm of forms. However, I have not read much of Aristotle except for the Nicomachean Ethics. In a nutshell, how does Aristotle pick up on Plato's forms and where would I ...
user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
70 views

Is a complex eternal first cause less likely than a simple eternal first cause?

I have seen this argument posed by people like Dawkins et. al, but is this actually true? Many have pointed to how complex things in nature generally come from simpler origins, but clearly, this isn't ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 3,364
2 votes
0 answers
44 views

Positive vs negative classes in ontology

I am interested in the nature of ontological classification and whether there exists some form of accepted terminology to distinguish classes that are 'positive' (matching characteristics) and classes ...
geotheory's user avatar
  • 141
2 votes
1 answer
94 views

Physical location of abstract objects

I was reading about the idea of a specific colour as an abstract object as defined by Plato, and how in 'Parmenides' he struggled with the fact that the type cannot be single and exist in multiple ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
1 vote
2 answers
123 views

What is an instance?

I see the definition of 'instances' and it makes sense when dealing with types that define physical objects, so any cat is an instance of the type 'cat', however, why do we discuss 'instances' of ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
0 votes
0 answers
110 views

Identity of mathematical objects

Leibniz law's states that if A and B have the same properties then A and B are one and the same, however we can consider mathematical objects that are isomoprhic but not identitical, they have the ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
1 vote
0 answers
97 views

Is 'a level of quantity' a poor definition of 'real number'?

I was thinking about how we define numbers with respect to their uses, and came up with the definition of 'a level of quantity' which can have a different physical consequence for each quantity ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
2 votes
3 answers
102 views

Could I (or something like my mind) exist because more complicated (mental) products than me exist?

Starting with a Cartesian-type 'cogito' argument, we might be sceptical that an 'I' exists, but rather suppose that we're embedded in a kind of perceptive process allowing us to experience thoughts, ...
WG82's user avatar
  • 31
-1 votes
1 answer
99 views

Relationship between real quantities and numbers [closed]

Is there a definition of the relationship between real quantities and the numbers we relate to them, generally we use 'numbers' as mathematical objects with a 'proper' nouns, but we associate them ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
0 votes
0 answers
38 views

Can a blind metaphysical will have knowledge?

Copleston stated of Schopenhauer's notion of a metaphysically "blind" will: "If the Will is blind it cannot know itself either directly or through the phenomenon, while, if it is the ...
rux23's user avatar
  • 127
3 votes
5 answers
160 views

Is being non existent the same as being zero in quantity

For instance, There does not exist unicorn on earth. There are zero unicorns on earth. How are these two different? One could argue being zero in quantity is a temporal property. The number may change ...
Parth Bhagwat's user avatar
4 votes
5 answers
851 views

How does entropy explain consciousness and the forward direction of time?

How does entropy explain consciousness and the forward direction of time? I was told that entropy is the increasing of disorderliness and that consciousness cannot exist as memory increases when ...
Sayaman's user avatar
  • 3,591
1 vote
2 answers
98 views

Sets vs 'association'

I previously asked whether abstract objects can be split into categories, groups or sets of their component parts, and was told, definitely, and later another question occurred to me, take an ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053
3 votes
3 answers
122 views

Can an 'abstract object' be a collection of constituent parts?

When I ask this, the use of collection or set is not necessarily 'mathematical', so if in this case I mean a collection of ideas that encapsulate it, 'make up' the idea in the same way the various ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,053

1
2 3 4 5
16