Questions tagged [philosophy-of-science]

for applied philosophical questions about the study of science, the pursuit of scientific knowledge, and the scientific method

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
0 answers
34 views

Recommendation for books that list abstract philosophical ideas used in sciences

I once saw people saying that sciences are about specific theories that matches empirical evidences, while in philosophy one is more interested in the idea behind such theories (e.g. the concept of ...
haha's user avatar
  • 1
5 votes
7 answers
2k views

What is the limit to how much humanity can advance in the physical sciences?

I currently adopt the view of reductive physicalism. Yet, I can’t help but wonder to what limits we can understand the universe. After all, are’t these fields firmly based on empirical evidence, ...
Lena Wena's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
94 views

Uniqueness in Nature and the tacit physicist method of "solving problems by uniqueness"

This was a question I asked on Physics SE which was, unfortunately, not well-received. I'm asking it here in the hopes that someone can talk about the nature of the logic/assumptions used in the sorts ...
EE18's user avatar
  • 181
8 votes
8 answers
3k views

Why is something coming from nothing seen as less intuitive than something existing eternally?

Many people often use the infinite regress argument of causality to posit an entity that always existed or was eternal. In their eyes, it escapes the problem. But how does it escape the problem? If it ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
2 votes
4 answers
110 views

Should philosophy be thought of in terms of bets with consequences?

There are many topics in philosophy that require people to have positions on, with arguably even a "no position" mentality being a form of position. But because we are all emotional beings, ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
-1 votes
4 answers
151 views

How would one characterize the argument that God could be physically impossible but chance can't be?

A lot of design arguments, especially ones that deal with fine tuning, seem to imply the notion that something is too improbable to be true, therefore a designer may have caused it. But no matter how ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
0 votes
2 answers
116 views

Bayes' Theorem and Science

More than one hypothesis may fit the data (hypotheses generation is the stock-in-trade of science) Choosing a scientific hypothesis is not about truth. People have gone on record that inter alia it's ...
Agent Smith's user avatar
  • 3,196
0 votes
2 answers
53 views

Is there such a thing as an argument from lack of explanation against God?

Every theory we've ever postulated to explain anything, it required a physical mechanism. For example Newton's laws describe how things interact with each other. Laws work together to produce certain ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
-2 votes
1 answer
49 views

Can anything be too improbable to have occurred without considering alternative hypotheses?

Without considering alternative hypotheses, is there even such a thing as something being too improbable to be true. Is there any sort of principle that says this is too unlikely under a hypothesis; ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
3 votes
3 answers
150 views

Why are physical and logical probabilities considered separate?

It is argued that there is a difference between these probabilities. When a dice lands on 6, it is argued that because it could have landed on 1-5 by the nature of physical laws, the probability is 1/...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
-1 votes
3 answers
76 views

Given the gambler's fallacy, why do we have a strong intuition of design if a remarkable result happens quickly in a game?

In any sort of game that involves selecting one out of many opportunities where one of those opportunities is a win, and each trial is independent and random, each trial has an equal chance of winning....
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
4 votes
1 answer
148 views

If platonism was correct, would everything be real despite everything being formal?

In one of his recent essays (https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2021/04/why-does-the-universe-exist-some-perspectives-from-our-physics-project/) the scientist Stephen Wolfram says (at the end of it, ...
vengaq's user avatar
  • 559
12 votes
10 answers
5k views

Dawkins on God: What are the strongest counters to his argument?

But the candidate solutions to the riddle of improbability are not, as is falsely implied, design and chance. They are design and natural selection. Chance is not a solution, given the high levels of ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
3 votes
4 answers
722 views

A Theory That Explains Everything Explains Nothing

The title of the question - A Theory That Explains Everything Explains Nothing - is said to be a quotation attributed to philosopher of science Karl Popper, but there's no consensus on whether he ...
Agent Smith's user avatar
  • 3,196
2 votes
3 answers
169 views

Does the Bayesian degree of belief system result in absurd conclusions?

In Bayesian epistemology, you are considered to have some sort of subjective prior probability of any hypothesis. Then, when a piece of potential evidence comes about, you can update that credence by ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
1 vote
0 answers
44 views

Does a post hoc hypothesis have the same evidentiary value as an apriori hypothesis without a prediction?

Philosophers often say that a hypothesis that predicts data D is better than a hypothesis that accommodates data D after the fact. But what about a hypothesis that exists before data D but doesn't ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
-3 votes
2 answers
93 views

Doesn’t the fact that we can’t assign a probability to God in itself defeat any possible arguments for it?

By God here, I mean the traditional conception of God, not some potentially mindless first cause, which could for all we know even be a soup of chemicals. Unless we can show that God as a Being is ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
-3 votes
3 answers
104 views

Why is “weak evidence” considered to make a theory more likely true than one with “no evidence” by many philosophers?

Suppose Jack and Jill both claim to be psychics. They both decide to make 100 predictions. Jack ends up getting 14 predictions right. Jill ends up getting no predictions right. Most would believe ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
1 vote
3 answers
79 views

Is using the law of large numbers to dismiss the significance of improbable event a valid form of inference?

Suppose I decide to play poker today and I'm dealt a royal flush. I then go back to the convenience store and win the lotto. While I'm going to pick up my prize, a speeding car barely misses me. ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
6 votes
8 answers
1k views

The Mediocrity Principle, The Laws of Nature and Free Will

The Mediocrity Principle, though it had a very specific meaning when it was first stated, is now a more general principle the essence of which is not to assume "a phenomenon is special, ...
Agent Smith's user avatar
  • 3,196
0 votes
6 answers
212 views

How does one make a design inference for a designer not discovered yet?

What would constitute as evidence of aliens transmitting a message? Researchers monitor radio transmissions for patterns that would support a design inference that such transmissions are sent by ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
2 votes
2 answers
154 views

Understanding the concept of "Entity"

I was reading the concept for an entity, it says: An entity is something that exists as itself, as a subject or as an object, real or potentially, concretely or abstractly, physically or not. It need ...
Kapoa's user avatar
  • 29
2 votes
3 answers
84 views

Should the occurrence of a theory T before data D is found affect its truth?

Suppose Adam has a theory that goblins exist in his attic. He hears noises coming from the attic even though he knows noone is in there. He realizes that even though it is possible that goblins in the ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
3 votes
3 answers
547 views

Are only human beings capable of rationally intentional acts?

Max Horkheimer's 1947 book The Eclipse of Reason argued that over the course of history, the conception of reason shifted from the objective - the Greek idea that reason qua logos governs the Cosmos - ...
Wayfarer's user avatar
  • 564
1 vote
0 answers
136 views

Mathematics and the observer in Wolfram Fundamental Physics Project...?

In this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrnteM9E2tI&t=6633s) about mathematics in the Wolfram Physics Project, Stephen Wolfram says at minute 1:49:37 something that seems contradictory: He ...
vengaq's user avatar
  • 559
1 vote
2 answers
97 views

What is science and which human fields of study are part of it?

Part 1. I was making some questions regarding scientific proofs here and I have been told that falsification "is a long abandoned idea of science, it lives on only in amateurish discussions"....
Bernardo Benini Fantin's user avatar
2 votes
5 answers
237 views

Differentiating between mathematical objects and their representations

The first time I came across this distinction was when I asked this question. It was highlighted to me that there is a difference between the matrix and how we represent it. There is a difference ...
Harshit Rajput's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
99 views

Meaning of the word Abstract

Recently I came across with a word called abstraction in mathematics which means the process of removing unimportant details from a system so that we can focus on the ones that really matter. I found ...
Harshit Rajput's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
117 views

How to make the notion of materialism testable/falsifiable?

The whole idea behind the scientific method is that reality is material in nature, is there any way that we could test this notion? All attempts by the scientific method to prove or substantiate the ...
user avatar
4 votes
4 answers
105 views

Digital Twin: what is the scientific status of outcomes of simulation?

Digital twins are representations (usually by means of software) of some aspects of physical systems. They are meant to enable the prediction or research of those systems - be these cities, ...
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
36 views

How should non-philosophers approach learning about philosophical things?

I believe that the 'proper' method for a nonscientist to learn about scientific things is to basically refer to the level of scientific consensus on a subject, yet there seems to be considerably less ...
cricket900's user avatar
-1 votes
6 answers
240 views

At which point does a meaningful coincidence call for a supernatural explanation?

Every time we've ever come across a seemingly marvelous coincidence that was repeatable and testable, it turned out to be representative of a law. It was a coincidence that turned out to be a real ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
0 votes
2 answers
95 views

Can we really measure something that's subjective?

Someone said we can't measure how creative something is, but isn't that completely wrong and dishonest? Isn't it the same as for intelligence? Isn't measuring intelligence based on a subjective model ...
Sayaman's user avatar
  • 3,787
3 votes
6 answers
245 views

The definition of life

The prevailing biology of the modern era describes life as a system. A system is defined a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism or an interconnecting network. The NASA definition of ...
Chanhyu Lee's user avatar
0 votes
3 answers
134 views

Are quantities/amounts a state of existence?

A quantity is often given like 'three metres' or 'two apples', but this seems more like a 'state' that any collection of entities can have. We describe many things as being'two people', the couple ...
Confused's user avatar
  • 1,073
1 vote
4 answers
151 views

Is conscious thought ever necessary?

I have noticed that every time I end up "sitting down" and "thinking" about something as if it's some sort of exercise to plan out, I end up just repeating thoughts in my head or ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
2 votes
2 answers
103 views

What are the arguments against modern technology, medicine and society? [closed]

In today's society, manual tasks have become automated. Digital communication devices have connected people across the globe. Medications and surgeries have lessened symptoms of illnesses, delayed ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,923
5 votes
4 answers
882 views

Does Bayesianism not discriminate against ad hoc hypotheses?

Bayesianism doesn't seem to discriminate against ad hoc hypotheses. A simple example illustrates this. Let's assume a person tosses a coin 20 straight times and it lands on heads. They, ad hoc, start ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,214
3 votes
1 answer
118 views

How does methodological naturalism deal with appeals to abstract objects like logical truths, mathematical truths, or natural kinds?

A core component of the modern scientific worldview and the beliefs of people and governments in western liberal democracies is that methodological naturalism is true. It is essential to scientific ...
Kenneth Goetz's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
272 views

What is Meant by a Pre-Theoretic Notion?

I don't quite understand the explanation given on Wikipedia for Pre-theoretic belief. It is often assumed, rightly or wrongly, that language depends on mental concepts, and that certain concepts are ...
Luca's user avatar
  • 139
0 votes
1 answer
83 views

Reversed Twin Earth: example from history of science

I'm looking for a real example from history of science, in which one thing is discovered to actually be two different things. This is a kind of a reversed Twin Earth experiment: Oscar's community is ...
Amit Hagin's user avatar
  • 1,008
6 votes
2 answers
183 views

Can changing the past ever be a coherent concept?

First, let me emphasize that I'm talking about changing THE past. Accounts with multiple timelines, say where travelling back in time causes a branching timeline, don't have this problem. Here is the ...
David Gudeman's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
63 views

Does Intuitionism extend to all type of science?

Mathematical Intuionism argues that Mathematical object only exist as constructions of the Human mind, but would't this also mean all type of science are like so? Since there is a requirement for an ...
tryst with freedom's user avatar
14 votes
9 answers
4k views

Is naturalism falsifiable?

From Wikipedia: In philosophy, naturalism is the idea or belief that only natural laws and forces (as opposed to supernatural ones) operate in the universe.[1] Naturalism is not so much a special ...
user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
96 views

About the absolute nature of the Answer to a particular question

Can every question regardless of the subject be answered? ( answer based on reality and not on "Phaneron" ) How is the reality taken to be true? ( Everything that is proven may not be true ...
Shashaank's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
245 views

Does science have any separate arguments for the existence of other minds?

For example, there is an argument of the best explanation in favor of the existence of other minds. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/other-minds/#BestExpl Is this argument used in science or is this ...
Johnny5454's user avatar
4 votes
4 answers
1k views

What are some examples of math that does *not* apply to the real world?

The "unreasonable effectiveness" of mathematics in describing the universe is often mentioned, but what about the sections of math that aren't applicable anywhere in physics at all? and why? ...
Will Graham's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
54 views

Probability based on insufficient data [closed]

The probability of some event is sometimes calculated or estimated based on insufficient empirical data, or scientific models that don't or can't take into account the major contributing factors. The ...
Chant's user avatar
  • 99
4 votes
7 answers
2k views

What would reality be like without causality? [closed]

If there were no physical laws of causality (law of gravitation, etc.) would there be "events", what would happen in the world when we act in our day to day life's? Trying to imagine a ...
rux23's user avatar
  • 117
1 vote
0 answers
150 views

Normative philosophy vs descriptive philosophy

I am making the question in simple terms to avoid logical ambiguity. IS normative philosophy(what should be) a subset of descriptive philosophy (What is) ? Is morality/ethics beauty/happiness is also ...
quanity's user avatar
  • 1,157

1 2 3
4
5
35