Questions tagged [philosophy-of-science]

for applied philosophical questions about the study of science, the pursuit of scientific knowledge, and the scientific method

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
2 answers
127 views

Circular logical universe versus Infinite Staircase universe

Suppose we keep asking the question of "why" to reality's laws, seeking deeper and deeper explanations of them. Examples : "why do coupling constants take these values"? "why ...
Ryder Rude's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
211 views

Are questions truth-apt; what is the use of assigning questions a truth-value?

Is John black (or white)? Yes he is black. No he is not (black). I don’t see how can the question be truth-apt and what use is there in assigning (or even being able to assign) a truth-value to the ...
George Ntoulos's user avatar
0 votes
3 answers
327 views

scientific inquiry of theory of evolution [closed]

In the context of scientific inquiry, the term prediction means "The logical consequences of a set of premises". Consider the following premises : Athena is taller than Zeno. Zeno is taller ...
quanity's user avatar
  • 1,157
-1 votes
1 answer
113 views

Proving the existence of God [duplicate]

I was wondering whether anyone has done, or attempted to do, any work, trying to prove the existence of God. If so, scary works such work be centered about, what would it do, or consist of, or what ...
Joselin Jocklingson's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
58 views

Space as being "cardinal-like"?

I was thinking about Zermelo's critique of Cantor's reasoning for the well-ordering principle, how Zermelo characterized it as an appeal to temporal intuition, whereby time itself does the well-...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
168 views

If there are theories of everything for science, are there equations of everything for math?

Some considerations: A related question is whether math is finite, and has been asked here before. Unlike science, math does not seem to be finite. As a dear friend of mine once retorted to me, "...
Xeon's user avatar
  • 481
10 votes
16 answers
6k views

Is there a way to tell if something is science versus pseudoscience?

Is there a litmus test to know whether something is science or pseudoscience? There are many things which is quite ambiguous like ayurveda, homeopathy, psychology, biology, etc...
quanity's user avatar
  • 1,157
1 vote
0 answers
117 views

speculative deductive reasoning

Is hypothetico-deductive reasoning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothetico-deductive_model and speculative deductive reasoning same ? (speculative deductive reasoning- WE arrive at the explanans ...
quanity's user avatar
  • 1,157
2 votes
2 answers
367 views

What's the difference between teleology and teleonomy?

So, Teleology is According to the Cambridge Dictionary: the belief that everything has a special purpose or use According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary: a doctrine (as in vitalism) that ends ...
Swike's user avatar
  • 129
9 votes
7 answers
3k views

Scientific stance on 'life from non-life, naturally'?

As far as I'm aware, almost everyone (from Dawkins to Lennox to Hovind) agrees that at some point in the past there was no life in our universe, and currently there is. Therefore life somehow arose ...
MarnixKlooster ReinstateMonica's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
98 views

Reasoning and Randomness

What is the relation between reasoning and randomness or more specifically finding any relation between logic and stochastic processes? Why does it work so well, I wonder. For instance, prices in ...
quanity's user avatar
  • 1,157
2 votes
4 answers
229 views

If we simulate a universe just like ours, is there any experiment simulated life could do to verify it is being simulated?

Akin to Einstein's principle of equivalence where the observer cannot tell if he or she is either in free fall or being accelerated (in a small enough region of spacetime); I'm wondering the same ...
Mmm Donuts's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
189 views

Causation vs correlation in the context of physics

How to know whether A and B is causal or correlated? Is it correct to say that physicists have always been concerned about causation? The laws of physics are stated in terms of equations that have ...
quanity's user avatar
  • 1,157
4 votes
5 answers
2k views

What is the relation between abductive reasoning and fallacy?

According to WP's article on abductive reasoning: [A]bduction is formally equivalent to the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent [citation needed] because of multiple possible explanations for ...
quanity's user avatar
  • 1,157
0 votes
2 answers
178 views

A question about quantum theory

In Nanavira's Notes on Dhamma he says: The source of the confusion is in the contradictory idea of a moment as the smallest possible interval of time—i.e. as absolute shortness of time—, and ...
Prince Deepthinker's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
105 views

Did it take till the likes of Lakoff and the 20th-21st century to have truly direct naturalized reasons for logic and math?

I’m finding George Lakoff and cohorts unique (but maybe that’s my lack of looking enough) in that they seem among the first to posit a direct, naturalized account of logic and mathematics, as ...
J Kusin's user avatar
  • 2,385
6 votes
10 answers
6k views

Is it wrong to fly on holiday?

I have the impression that more and more colleagues disapprove of me flying for holidays. That made me ponder, but I'm not convinced that I'm making a moral mistake. I argue that my actions cannot be ...
user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
143 views

When did Occam's razor historically become a common methodological precept? [closed]

When I went to college, more than 30 years ago, as far as I can remember, nobody was talking about the use of Occam's razor in science. Reading the works of past scientists such as Einstein, ...
Mark's user avatar
  • 129
0 votes
1 answer
77 views

Falsification of a statement

Is falsification only applicable to deductive reasoning (as opposed to inductive, abductive and speculative deductive reasoning)?
quanity's user avatar
  • 1,157
1 vote
3 answers
150 views

Is finding data to fit a hypothesis unscientific? [closed]

It seems to me that many people find observations/data in order to fit the hypothesis or to prove the conclusion of their arguments. In one example, one might regard taking a set of lab data and going ...
quanity's user avatar
  • 1,157
1 vote
0 answers
102 views

Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language

I don't quite understand the objective of his paper on the matter of scientific language and the application of his languages I II and corresponding syntax. I also don't understand why his and Vienna ...
Jack Frosher's user avatar
5 votes
9 answers
6k views

Certainty is not possible in science

So I have formulated a set of arguments to argue certainty is not possible in science. Did I make an illogical argument here or like is there anything amiss in my argument? Opinion: Science can reach ...
Lawrence's user avatar
  • 166
1 vote
2 answers
109 views

What If theory can be proved practically correct even if being contradictory to itself in theory? Can it be possible?

I mean, let's take an example of science. Is there have any theory that was contradictory in nature but proved correct in observations or practical?
Schnoz's user avatar
  • 57
4 votes
13 answers
3k views

Opinion vs Fact

How do I know if a piece of infromation is a fact or an opinion? I read that facts can be proven while opinions can't, but for example if I say: "It is hot!": It can be proven whether I'm ...
AZeed's user avatar
  • 278
6 votes
1 answer
443 views

Platonism in modern philosophy of physics: Stephen Wolfram and Max Tegmark ideas

Recently, Stephen Wolfram wrote an interesting article about his proposed relationship between maths and physics (https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2022/03/the-physicalization-of-metamathematics-and-...
vengaq's user avatar
  • 559
0 votes
2 answers
92 views

In the nature-nurture war, what wins? Nature or nurture? [closed]

We focus on not only nature, the genetic factors of behavior, but also nurture, the environmental factors of behavior. But how can environmental factors be separate from genetic factors? Don't genetic ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,923
0 votes
8 answers
185 views

Objectiv requirements for human rights/natural rights

Some ethical problems I've run into while writing a story set in a near future where general artificial intelligence, mind upload and radical genetic engineering are a thing. If you could scan someone'...
Paulo Raposo's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
58 views

How can spirituality be reliably researched? [closed]

My questions are 1 is there a reliable method for research into spiritual activity such as an individual providing healing, or any other service? 2 is there a ‘happy medium’ pardon the pun, that’s ...
Eranerdog's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
102 views

A word that encapsulates the strongest aspects of "model" and "theory" (and perhaps "hypothesis")?

I saw What is the difference between a "model" and a "theory"?, where it says, like Wikipedia says, that a scientific theory is a well-tested and thoroughly researched explanation ...
Lance's user avatar
  • 227
24 votes
13 answers
11k views

The Unreasonable Ineffectiveness of Mathematics in most sciences

In 1960, the physicist Eugene Wigner wrote the article "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences" explaining how unexpected it is that mathematical formalism can ...
Davius's user avatar
  • 641
1 vote
3 answers
94 views

Is there evidence for claims that specific actions are moral due to intrinsic, objective features of those actions? [closed]

The phrase moral realism will be used to cover the idea that actions can be right or wrong, permitted or forbidden, etc. due to qualities that are internal to the objective nature of those actions. ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,923
5 votes
6 answers
1k views

Can emotions be logical? And can logic and emotion co-exist?

Logic and emotion tend to be considered as polar opposites. When someone is empathetic or generally emotional, they are not claimed to be logical. The parts of the brain responsible for logic and ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,923
1 vote
3 answers
142 views

Does time have a changing speed?

Based on my own personal experiences and responses from other people I have questioned time is more than numbers. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems to me that it is a fact that pleasure speeds up ...
George Cortte's user avatar
1 vote
5 answers
256 views

Can retribution be justified without free will?

Without free will, our behaviour would be no different from any other natural phenomenon, Sam Harris and other determinists claim: https://i.stack.imgur.com/DSVFq.jpg “Compare the response to ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,923
1 vote
4 answers
244 views

"You never know until you try"?

Is it not possible to know our preferences for sure until we try? Do we have to try eating things to know whether or not we actually dislike the foods? Where does this saying stop? Do we have to try e....
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,923
4 votes
7 answers
7k views

We know Classical Mechanics is wrong. But can we also say every other theory is wrong except the Theory of Everything?

Classical Mechanics (CM) or Quantum Mechanics (QM) is technically wrong. That doesn't mean they are irrelevant or have less significance, but they are wrong regardless of how accurate they are. Can we ...
Abdul Muhaymin's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
154 views

Is it ever appropriate to say a phenomenon is unexplainable?

Scientific research involves the investigation of difficult problems, and constantly tries to explain the unknown through observations and logical reasoning. Take a situation like finding a cure for ...
DdogBoss's user avatar
  • 103
1 vote
1 answer
522 views

Does causation exist?

It is often claimed that radioactivity, virtual particles popping in and out of existence, quantum mechanics, etc have no causes. That at the level of fundamental physics, causes and effects are ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,923
6 votes
5 answers
1k views

On the connection between science and reality

My question is basically targetting various sciences that we use to understnad the real world and how we form laws in them. For example, in physics, we first see sometthing in the real world. Let it ...
Aveer Singh's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
1k views

Eastern Science and Western Science

I saw that some people trying to differentiate science into western and eastern. What are the criteria for parting them?
Wenura's user avatar
  • 137
4 votes
2 answers
219 views

On physical existence. Do virtual particles of QFT exist?

Existence is a polysemic and difficult word to define. Almost certainly numbers (and other well-defined mathematical objects) exist in a different way than a real physical object (the chair I sit in, ...
Davius's user avatar
  • 641
2 votes
2 answers
131 views

Proper Philosophical Texts on the Philosophy of Science

I am a college freshman majoring in Philosophy and Physics. I am interested in the Philosophy of Physics, but before that, I would like to get an idea of general philosophical issues in the sciences. ...
Sumit Tripathi's user avatar
2 votes
6 answers
846 views

What is the difference between a Belief and Truth

I was interested in the definition of truth, i followed this post What is the difference between Fact and Truth? what I understood is that truth is anything I believe in or appears to be accurate ...
Kryptic Coconut's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
231 views

Difference between Truth and Fact [duplicate]

I was interested in the difference between truth and fact. For me, truth is a belief that appears to be from a perspective. and a fact is an undeniable reality. Is this way of thinking correct? How ...
Kryptic Coconut's user avatar
-3 votes
1 answer
138 views

Is gravity a natural manifestation of universal egoism? [closed]

What bothers me is the possibility that egoism could be an intrinsic trait of existence in general. So we have gravity whereby masses pull each other towards themselves. An objection could be that ...
exp8j's user avatar
  • 341
1 vote
3 answers
147 views

What are the justifications for holding concretes to be more important than abstractions?

What are the justifications for holding concretes to be more real or more important than abstractions like ideas and thoughts?
MIKEY SINGH's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
666 views

Paradoxes never exist in nature, so why does the grandfather's paradox make sense in physics?

Paradoxes don't exist in nature, so why does the grandfather paradox make sense in physics? This question has no mathematical or physical answer and can only have a philosophical answer. Seemingly ...
newuser10's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
110 views

Why is a child not a mere extension of their "parent(s)"?

If "reproduction" were an organism replicating and making a copy of itself, how is a child/offspring not a mere extension of the "parent(s)"? In humans, the human child/offspring ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,923
1 vote
5 answers
287 views

When does something cease to exist?

For humans, legally speaking, someone who's "brain dead" is confirmed to have ceased to exist. But what about philosophically speaking? What makes someone who they are? If we are our bodies, ...
ActualCry's user avatar
  • 1,923
4 votes
3 answers
491 views

Is it possible to reconcile post-structuralism with the scientific method?

Post-structuralist thought seems, to me, to be quite hard to argue with as a concept. Clearly, we understand the world through language, which both stems from culture, loading concepts with cultural ...
Bob Tway's user avatar
  • 833

1
3 4
5
6 7
35