Questions tagged [predicate-logic]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
1 answer
35 views

Instantiation of the statement : (x)Px ∨ (x)Qx [closed]

1.(x)Px ∨ (x)Qx I am currently reading a logic book by Patrick J. Hurley, and in the book the author says that we can't universally instantiate a statement like statement 1. Specifically, he says that ...
  • 17
1 vote
2 answers
58 views

Help needed with predicate interpretations- Wilfrid Hodges logic

I was going through Hodges' Introduction to Elementary Logic and was rather puzzled by a section where one is asked to translate an argument into a predicate interpretation. The entire thing reads: ...
2 votes
3 answers
130 views

Philosophy book written using logic statements

I would like to translate a philosophy text into logic axioms and propositions. Then, I would like to use prolog to check if the text is logically consistent. However, I find it difficult to translate ...
-1 votes
3 answers
108 views

Translation of Arguments from Propositional Logic to Predicate Logic

How exactly does this work? What can we assume stays the same, what changes? Take for an example this (valid) argument: A & ~C ~C > ~D ~D > B ∴ B Now let us take rewrite it according to ...
0 votes
1 answer
38 views

At most one relations: using Negation Vs Implication

I am trying to come to terms with expressing using quantifiers using various examples. My question here is about a general approach for expressing at-most one relations in logical language. For ...
  • 103
0 votes
1 answer
48 views

Natural Deduction Proof with double quantifier (predicate logic) [closed]

Premise: (∃y)(∀x)(Px v Py) Conclusion: ~(∀y)(~Py) I'm starting out assuming the negation, i.e., (∀y)(~Py). But then I'm unsure how to find a contradiction within that subderivation. Here's what I've ...
2 votes
1 answer
109 views

Understanding the syntax of subsitution

I have a question about the meaning and semantics of substitution, I apologise if this is off-topic but I thought here would be the best place as it's more about the semantics and meaning than any ...
  • 793
1 vote
0 answers
94 views

Nested Quantifiers Proof - Logic

When I prove this: -∃x.P(x) ⊢ ∀x.-P(x) [True] I did it like that: ∀x.-P(x) ⊢ ∀x.-P(x) because (negative ∃) -∃x.P(x) becomes ∀x.-P(x) so that we can say that it's true. However, I didn't ...
0 votes
1 answer
53 views

Proof of the Model Universe Theorem: Proving the invalidity arguments in quantifier logic

I am studying how to prove an argument in quantifier logic is invalid. The textbook I am using by Virginia Klenk claims that you can use a Model Universe that contains a finite number of objects to ...
-2 votes
1 answer
146 views

Help me solve this predicate logic proof theory: -(∀z)(∃y)Tzy ⊢ (∃z)(∀y)-Tzy

-(∀z)(∃y)Tzy ⊢ (∃z)(∀y)-Tzy Using Lande, (AI,EI,AE,EE,->E,->I,-I,--E,^I,^E,vI,vE) I cannot figure out the proof on this sequent.
2 votes
0 answers
58 views

Could we supply logics make quantification over logical constants?

In first order logic, we make quantification over individuals, and in second order logic, we make quantification over properties. So could we supply logics make quantification over logical constants, ...
0 votes
0 answers
114 views

Is ∀x x = x a first-order validity or simply a logical truth (that is not a first-order validity?

I've been wondering about this. The textbook ''Language, Proof and Logic'' defines a first-order validity as the following: ''A sentence of FOL is a first-order validity if it is a logical truth when ...
2 votes
2 answers
102 views

Is al-Farabi right that predicates must add information and existence is not a predicate?

Al-Farabi claimed that existence is not a predicate, because "exists" as in "Apple is red and exists." doesn't bring any new information, but does a predicate have to bring in a ...
  • 1,799
0 votes
2 answers
245 views

Is categorical logic the same as predicate logic

In philosophical logic, categorical logic is the logic that deals with the logical relationship between categorical statements. I wonder if categorical logic is considered the same as predicate logic (...
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
60 views

Is the following derivation of predicate logic correct?

I recently discovered https://proofs.openlogicproject.org/, except I'm still figuring out the appropriate rules that are needed for the system to check my proof. I thought it'd be quicker to turn to ...
1 vote
1 answer
68 views

Checking translations of predicate logic

Let Dx = "x is a detective", U12 = "1 is the uncle of 2", and appropriate lowercase letters for names. If there are any detectives, John is the only detective. No detective is ...
0 votes
0 answers
46 views

Are ontic predicates similarly (or even well) defined across philosophers? Do they differ from logic predicates?

I've seen the term "ontic predicate" bandied around in some works. Whenever it has a clear definition it seem no different than how one would define it in (first-order) logic, i.e. it being ...
  • 1,817
1 vote
1 answer
114 views

ontological commitments to properties

Quine's famous thesis about ontological commitment is roughly the following: there exist only entities which fall under the domain of quantification of our theory and that can be the values of ...
  • 395
-2 votes
2 answers
152 views

How to prove ∀x∃y(Fx→Gy) ⊢ ∃y∀x(Fx→Gy) using natural deduction? [closed]

∀x∃y(Fx→Gy) ⊢ ∃y∀x(Fx→Gy) I tried to use reductio ad absurdum by assuming ¬∃y∀x(Fx→Gy) and then using quantifier negation to simplify it further, but it got very messy when I had to use ∃-elimination ...
  • 1
0 votes
1 answer
46 views

Question about proving a set that is quantificationally inconsistent in PD+ (Finished the proof but want it to be checked)

Does ∃x(Nx & ~Nx) contradiction itself? Is there an error in my proof? Thank you
-1 votes
2 answers
86 views

Fitch Proof help please

I think I got it, could you take a look, please.
2 votes
2 answers
134 views

Can 'All S is P' ever be false if S is empty?

I'm self-learning logic, I'm stuck on an issue similar to this question: In modern logic, why does "All S is P" contradict "Some S is not P"? In the boolean interpretation 'All S ...
3 votes
5 answers
405 views

Why is first-order logic interesting to philosophers?

This site had a question: Is First Order Logic (FOL) the only fundamental logic? Let me ask the opposite: Why is FOL still interesting or useful to philosophers? For example, the "ancestor" ...
  • 453
0 votes
4 answers
565 views

Why is the notion of domain of discourse at all necessary in predicate logic?

The notion of domain of discourse (also: domain of discourse, universe of discourse, universal set, or universe) is a fixture of mathematical logic which is sometimes claimed to be necessary to the ...
  • 4,645
4 votes
1 answer
365 views

What are the advantages of Aristotle's term logic over predicate logic?

I have read Wikipedia's term logic entry, and the quote by Gareth Evans in the Revival section that's supposed to argue for term logic's advantages over predicate logic: "I come to semantic ...
  • 453
2 votes
1 answer
89 views

What are some of the struggles that come with teaching formal logic? [closed]

I'm currently an undergraduate student who wants to do research on the pedagogy of formal logic. As a result, I wanted to know what are some challenges that instructors (or even students for that ...
11 votes
1 answer
2k views

How do you differentiate between At least one X and Exactly one X in predicate logic?

Here are the following two sentences. At least one person speaks English. ∃𝑥E(x) Exactly one person speaks English. Instead of ∃𝑥E(x), what do I write?
0 votes
1 answer
75 views

What is the difference between p ∧ (p → q) and p → q?

I understand why with a truth table p ∧ (p → q) and p → q are different but from a semantic point they look exactly the same to me. At a glance from a semantics point they look like they should have ...
  • 101
1 vote
0 answers
35 views

Can you universally specify using a proper name that is already present in the premise?

i was working on one of the problems in Patrick Suppes' An Introduction to logic, and it asks to show whether "Ptah is an egyptian god. Ptah is the father of all egytpian gods. Therefore Ptah is the ...
2 votes
3 answers
228 views

Is ¬(a = b) the same as (a ≠ b) in logic

Are these the same in predicate logic with identity: ¬ (a = b) a ≠ b I'm not quite sure whether they can be used interchangeably in proofs. Any help would be great!
1 vote
1 answer
46 views

How does identity work in modal predicate logic?

Namely how can we can have a correspondence between objects in different possible worlds if they are different? If we have two worlds in S5 aw0(P(x)) = 1 and aw1(P(x)) = 0 How can we 'identify' x ...
-2 votes
2 answers
113 views

Predicate Logic

How do I derive this? Pr 1 ∀x(Fx -> ∀xGx) ∴ ∀x(Fx -> ∀x(Gx \ / Hx)) My attempt: However I cannot used universal derivation due to the free x. I think using ass id and qn would be better ...
  • 15
0 votes
1 answer
99 views

Predicate Logic Proof Help! ∃xAx ∨ ∃yFy , ∀x(Ax → Fx) |= ∃xFx [closed]

I am unable to prove it :( I think I need to assume - ∃xFx but what follows later on?
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
98 views

Predicate Logic - Are these two sentences equivalent?

Could you tell me if these two sentences are equivalent? If they aren't, what would be the correct sentence that is equivalent to (1)? Please explain. Thank you! (1) (∀x)[Ax→(∃y)(By & Txy)] (2) (...
  • 1
0 votes
1 answer
35 views

Homework Question on Quantified Logic Falsehood

For one of my homework challenge questions, I have a true or false type question. The question is as follows: True or False: I'm not particularly sure how to solve this. I have no information about ...
  • 3
0 votes
1 answer
236 views

Question about v-variants of variable assignments

In Full Predicate Calculus, some variable assignment q satisfies a disjunction under interpretation U if q satisfies one or both disjuncts under U, it satisfies a conjunction under interpretation U if ...
0 votes
1 answer
31 views

Having trouble translating english to FOL

Having trouble with this phrase: Any column that contains a cube contains a tetrahedron, and vice versa. I tried this: ∀x ∀y ((Cube(x) ∧ Tet(y)) → SameCol(x, y)) which is incorrect because this says ...
1 vote
2 answers
105 views

Truth Value of Definite Descriptions

I'm currently studying definite descriptions in logic. My textbook postulates Bertrand Russell's view of definite descriptions, but I'm curious about other views as well (in the context of classical 2-...
  • 297
0 votes
1 answer
75 views

SELF-REFERENCE AND THE LANGUAGES OF ARITHMETIC

Hello can someone explain me exacty how in this fragment of the paper (SELF-REFERENCE AND THE LANGUAGES OF ARITHMETIC, RICHARDG.HECK,JR.): (9) Tr(x) ≡∃y(rhs(x,y)∧¬Tr(y)), where rhs(x,y) is a formula ...
  • 47
4 votes
1 answer
378 views

Proof Using Model Universe

Suppose I am trying to prove the following argument (∀x)(Cx → Dx), (∀x)(Ex → ~Dx), /∴ (∀x)(Ex → ~Cx) Now, let's also assume that I don't know if this argument is valid or not. Because of this, I try ...
  • 297
1 vote
1 answer
144 views

What are some benefits of a second order logic?

I have read that a second-order logic can help one define equality by quantifying over all predicates such as what is done in the following definition: (x=y):⟺[∀P:P(x)⟺P(y)] By contrast a first-...
0 votes
2 answers
135 views

How does one tell if logical expressions are equivalent?

How do I check if these expressions are equivalent? ∀a,b [P(a) ∧ ¬R(a) ∧ S(b)] → G(a,b) ∀a [(P(a) ∧ ¬R(a)) → (∀b [S(b) → G(a,b)])]
5 votes
2 answers
414 views

Is it possible to construct infinitely many non-equivalent formulas in predicate logic?

In the language of predicate logic with only identity and no predicates, function symbols, or constants, is it possible to construct infinitely many non-equivalent formulas?
3 votes
2 answers
342 views

Are there paradoxes involved in allowing for an unrestricted domain in predicate logic?

I've put some thought into this, and just want to make sure I'm on track, or if I need to be corrected. Basically, my answer is this: Yes, you need to always specify a domain when formalizing into ...
  • 1,229