Questions tagged [propositions]
The propositions tag has no usage guidance.
4
votes
1answer
81 views
Is the principle of non-contradiction self-evident?
The principle of non-contradiction is that contradictory propositions cannot both be true, e. g. the two propositions "A is B" and "A is not B" are mutually exclusive.
However, whenever something is ...
2
votes
1answer
164 views
How does a truth tree provide positive and negative effect tests for implication?
I'm trying to prove that the truth-tree method can be used to give a positive effect test for implication, and a negative effect test for non-implication. I've been given the fact that The truth-tree ...
2
votes
0answers
92 views
Why don't two equivalent propositions contribute to the same semantics?
We often have 2 propositions that have the same truth table, in that they are true and false given the same conditions.
Nevertheless, we still feel as though there different semantics (i.e meaning..),...
0
votes
3answers
123 views
On Truth and Lying
If A, consciously, reports false data to B, and B (or anyone else) has no way to verify, then no one can make the statement, "A lied". So, there exists no such person with respect to whom A lied.
...
9
votes
2answers
491 views
In logic, do propositions default to true or false when objects in them do not exist?
In this hypothetical:
Firefighters always tell the truth, while politicians always tell lies.
Suppose three people, who are either a mix of firefighters and politicians, all politicians, or all ...
2
votes
5answers
247 views
Why is questioning everything around us so important?
I've heard something disturbing from my friend. He said he's grateful to his father because his father taught him to question everything that was around us.
Why is this so important?
5
votes
3answers
157 views
How does one judge “complexity” of assumptions for the purposes of “best explanation”?
The context for this question is from assessing theological arguments from the point of view of 'inference to the best explanation'.
In philosophy (and science), we may wish to argue that some ...
2
votes
3answers
47 views
Understanding multiple values in a single cell of a truth table (P v ~Q) as (1 1 0 1) when P and Q are 1
This might seem basic to most here but I am struggling with a truth table for a disjunct. As I am looking at it further, I actually think the issue I am struggling with how to interpret truth values ...
1
vote
1answer
102 views
Into what category does following view place me in moral philosophy?
At first, I believe the statements like "Pete is wrong" and "Mike acts in a bad way" have some cognitive value. At first glance, this puts me to ethical cognitivism.
But at the same time I think the ...
4
votes
1answer
243 views
The nature of elementary propositions in the Tractatus
So all complex objects in the world are, at the most fundamental level, made up of simple un-analysable objects which are denoted by 'names'.
Combinations of simple objects constitute 'states of ...
2
votes
1answer
179 views
Making 'sense' of Wittgenstein's senselessness / nonsense distinction in the Tractatus
For this question I'm just considering Wittgenstein's theory at the time of the Tractatus.
As far as I know, for Wittgenstein:
Meaning - The object denoted by a word (i.e. referent).
Sense - The ...
1
vote
2answers
143 views
Confusion about an implication's contrapositive
I just begin learning propositional logic and find a little bit confused when trying to translate the contrapositive of an implication back to the English language.
For example, I have an ...
2
votes
0answers
147 views
Russell on Negative Facts
Okay. I am reading Russell's paper "On Propositions: What They are and How They Mean". Since the truth or falsehood of a belief depends upon a fact to which the belief "refers", and propositions are ...
2
votes
3answers
108 views
Problem with propositions about future
I have some questions about propositions of future like “tomorrow, there will be rain” or “you won’t go to school tomorrow”
1) Are there certain truth values of future propositions? For example, ...
2
votes
5answers
662 views
In propositional logic, why can a FALSE antecedent of conditional be simplified to TRUE?
Please help me formulate my sentences/thoughts here into logical jargon and solve Case 2 below.
Why does the truth table for an implication → look like this:
| p | q | p → q|
| T | T | T |
| T | ...
1
vote
0answers
239 views
Create a statement in propositional logic. This statment must have 2 attributes. (The attributes are specified in the top header)
The following are the 2 attributes: (1) This statement claims the statement after it is true. (2) This statement cannot be not true.
This statement would achieve these 2 attributes through its ...
3
votes
1answer
109 views
What are the rules for a zero-premise derivation involving disjunctions?
I'm having trouble with the following zero-premise deduction that involves two disjunctions:
The solution seems simple, but I'm unsure of how to proceed with the two disjunctions. If it were just ...
4
votes
2answers
776 views
Definition of proposition
The term proposition has a broad use in contemporary philosophy. It is used to refer to some or all of the following: the primary bearers of truth-value, the objects of belief and other "propositional ...
1
vote
1answer
272 views
How is this premises and conclusion to refute Searle's CR experiment?
So I've been digging into this topic for days now. I've gone through his paper and also some threads here, which I found were very helpful.
I came up with these premises and following conclusions in ...
1
vote
3answers
204 views
Is there a logical system that accounts for cause and effect relationship?
The reason I ask is because of the ambiguity of some statements when the conditionals of a condition are not referenced by tense i.e time. For example, in the Cognito Ergo Sum 'I think therefore I am',...
5
votes
1answer
79 views
Are analytic propositions always vacuously true?
In a possible world where there are no bachelors is the proposition "bachelors are unmarried" vacuously true? Or is it tautologically true and you would then need to quantify bachelors as "all ...
1
vote
1answer
69 views
Can we know a predicate without a subject, non-propositionally? [closed]
Can we have non-propositional knowledge, for example knowledge of a predicate without a subject? I think an example would be: only this is now, which uses indexicals. I'm asking because I wonder ...
3
votes
2answers
361 views
Implication Introduction formulated as a theorem?
While making a list of the rules of inference for my math students, I came across this list on Wikipedia:
I noticed a pattern: for every introduction rule, there seems to be an elimination rule, and ...
1
vote
0answers
437 views
Why is the statement false: If (A⊃B)∨(A⊃C) is true, then A implies either B or C
I'm reviewing my previous exams for the final, and the only two true or false questions that confuse me are:
If (A⊃B)∨(A⊃C) is true, then A implies either B or C.
(P⊃Q)∨(P⊃~Q) means P⊃(Q∨~Q).
The ...
7
votes
3answers
789 views
Intuitively, why are Universal Statements true in the Empty Universe?
Source: p 165. Sweet Reason: A Field Guide to Modern Logic (2010 2 ed) by Henle, Garfield, Tymoczko.
I read this on Math SE; please advise if it pertains to my simpler question.
One property of ...
3
votes
1answer
164 views
Why isn't “I am Bill” a proposition?
In fleshing out the traditional definition of omniscience, William Lane Craig distinguishes between propositional knowledge and non-propositional knowledge, claiming that to be omniscient is to know ...
2
votes
0answers
45 views
Can the material conditional be used in other situations?
Can the material conditional in classical logic (e.g. propositional logic or predicate logic like first-order logic) be used to reason about propositions that are not factual? E.g., using a ...
3
votes
2answers
227 views
can we know whether the self-referential statement: “It's not possible to deduce whether P1 is true or false” is undecidable?
Update: Simple concise version
Thanks to Nick R for pointing in the right direction.
The statement P0: "this statement is false" is undecidable.
The statement P1: "this statement is undecidable" is ...
0
votes
1answer
102 views
Does the existence of the proposition require language to be referential?
If we grant that there is a proposition wherein something meaningful is being asserted, does that require us to think of language as essentially representative in some way?
If language didn't contain ...
2
votes
1answer
818 views
What are factual propositions?
I've been reading up on epistemology, after having studied a bit of logic. Given that, I am in a good (or at least better) position to understand a proposition, and it's properties. One such property ...
1
vote
4answers
390 views
Truth Value of Sentences Containing Logical Contradictions
Do propositions containing logical contradictions have truth values, or are they meaningless? For example:
A) Some married bachelors exist.
B) 95% of married bachelors live in Maryland.
C) ...
3
votes
1answer
101 views
Wittgenstein and Picturing Relationships
I've been listening to BBC's "In Our Time" on Wittgenstein here, but I can't seem to understand why Wittgenstein thought that "a proposition can't picture the pictorial relationship." One of the ...
4
votes
7answers
549 views
How do you prove that this is a tautology?
((p->q) and (r->s) and (p or r)) -> (q or s)
How would you prove that this is a tautology? Using natural deduction?
My attempt on this question is the following.
Since a tautology means W entails ...
1
vote
1answer
90 views
Is what makes a proposition true only determined by its referent?
I was wondering if it is trivial that when the content of a belief can be given or "determined" by mind independent reality, the belief is "about" mind independent reality.
I think that the content ...
1
vote
2answers
83 views
Would the absence of universals not make it impossible to make and/or express judgments?
Predication is an integral part of making a judgement, which is expressed in propositions (such as 'the sun is round'). Predication itself is possible because in some sense something can be said of ...
0
votes
1answer
160 views
Wittgenstein criticizes Coffey's work 'The Science of Logic' in its assumption that every proposition requires a subject and a predicate. Why?
Why does Wittgenstein believe there can be propositions that lack a subject or predicate? What examples does Wittgenstein give in support of this belief?
3
votes
2answers
65 views
If we assume that principles are the simplest propositions that can be said about an object, can they coherently be rejected?
An argument for some sort of 'principles' in the Aristotelian sense is as follows:
1.) If we can think something about something, we must be able to think at least the most simple of propositions ...
3
votes
1answer
10k views
Difference between a sentence and a proposition in philosophy [closed]
Explain and illustrate the difference between a sentence and a proposition in philosophy
2
votes
2answers
3k views
Conjunctive and disjunctive assertions
I am a new learner to logic and philosophy, after spending some time reading Introduction to Logic by Copi, Cohen & McMahon, I'm stuck on this matter... please help me so I can read forward...
...
10
votes
8answers
5k views
What is the truth value of the proposition 'All unicorns are beautiful'?
If we let Fx denotes that which has the property of being a unicorn, and Gx denotes that which has the property of being beautiful, then this proposition would be signified by the following:
∀x(Fx→Gx)...
11
votes
5answers
460 views
Shouldn't statements be considered equivalent based on their meaning rather than truth tables?
Consider the following truth table, which serves to define the logical connective ⇔,
P | Q || P⇔Q
T | T || T
T | F || F
F | T || F
F | F || T
According to the above truth table, the logical ...
1
vote
1answer
109 views
Alternate axioms for relevant logic R
Relevant logic system R can be defined -as I read in D. Palladino, C. Palladino, Logiche non classiche- by the following axioms
A→A
(A→B)→((C→A)→(C→B))
(A→(A→B))→(A→B)
(A→(B→C))→(B→(A→C))
A∧B→A, A∧B→...
2
votes
1answer
81 views
A∧B-worlds and law of enrichment in Stalnaker semantics
In Stalnaker semantics a conditional A↦B is true in world u if either A is not logically possible (ex absurdo quodlibet holds in the semantics) or A is logically possible and B is true in the nearest ...
0
votes
0answers
51 views
Semantic Fictionalism
Is the belief that there are no propositions.
Why believe it?
Does it suggest we might know Ramsey sentences: I think (I am not at all sure) these may not express anything about propositions.
