Questions tagged [quine]
W.V.O. Quine (1908-2000) was a prominent 20th century analytic philosopher.
63
questions
1
vote
1answer
104 views
How has Analytic Philosophy Survivied Quine's Criticism?
Analytic philosophy and techniques, in which philosophy is approached as a primarily linguistic and logic exercise, has been the dominant mode of philosophy in the Anglo-American world for most of the ...
1
vote
1answer
28 views
In Quine's ontology, why does a 'recognition' of something lead to ontological commitment while a 'feeling' does not?
We are discussing Quine's On What There Is in a metaphysics class I am in. I felt like I understood what he meant, that if something has to be predicated for in a sentence, we are ontologically ...
1
vote
1answer
53 views
Is there any correlation between Quine’s underdetermination and bayesian issues of old evidence and new theories?
Bayesianism has some faults some of them are the problem of old evidence and the issue of new theories. Are these two problems linked to Quine’s underdetermination? Or are they contrasting it? What is ...
0
votes
0answers
38 views
Does Sellars and Quine oppose Ostensive definition?
Sellars refuted "given" and Quine spoke of the "the indeterminacy of translation".In Quine's case,a linguist could not translate or get the meaning of the word exactly even by pointing out the thing ...
2
votes
0answers
43 views
How does Sellars's “myth of given” relate to Quine's “observation sentences”?
Sellars refuted the claim we can reason from our "fundamental" experience, since all the words we use to report our experience must be affected by our conceptual schema. But Quine's seems to give "...
2
votes
1answer
162 views
Differences and similarities between Kuhn and Quine about the indeterminacy of translation
About Thomas Kuhn's semantic incommensurability:
Early on Kuhn drew a parallel with Quine's thesis of the indeterminacy of translation (1970a, 202; 1970c, 268). According to the latter, if we are ...
7
votes
2answers
691 views
Are “to exist” and “to have being” the same?
I recently read an introduction about ontology. A section was about the debate whether to exist and to have being is the same.
One position says (attributed to Meinong), that some things exist and ...
1
vote
2answers
58 views
What is Quine’s Confirmation theory?
I have just read that Quine relies on his confirmation theory to establish if a scientific theory is “valid” or not. But I am not sure to have understood what is Quine’s confirmation theory and why ...
2
votes
0answers
47 views
The synthetic apriority of the categorical imperative
Weirdness I noticed about Kant's theory of the categorical imperative: he says that the CI is "synthetic," in the second Critique using the very imposing phrase "sic volo, sic jubeo" to characterize ...
0
votes
0answers
38 views
Quine's perspective on laws of nature
I am studying Lewis and his best system account of laws of nature so I am wondering what is Quine's viewpoint on laws on nature and if his perspective is similar to the lewisian one.
0
votes
0answers
31 views
Humean supervenience and Quine
I am wondering if Quine would adopt the Lewis' Humean supervenience theory to make sense of probability. Quine is a subjectivist about probability (even though regarding probability in QM he thinks ...
4
votes
1answer
62 views
What are good sources on vivid designators?
Wikipedia lists a vivid designator as the following:
Vivid designator:
In modal logic and the philosophy of language, a vivid designator is a
term which is believed to designate the same ...
1
vote
0answers
90 views
How and why Aristotelian essentialism is a problem for Quine?
I cannot understand how and why the Aristotelian essentialism is problematic for Quine. I have tried to read articles on the theme but probably I am not smart enough to understand them. Could you ...
1
vote
0answers
31 views
What is Quine’s reductionism?
I am especially interested in how reductionism is related to the fact that even though science broadly comprehends a number of subjects, physics is paradigmatic.
2
votes
3answers
147 views
Why are non-logical predicates of 0-arity treated as logical variables?
In the "Non-logical symbols" section of Wikipedia, it states:
A predicate symbol (or relation symbol) with some valence (or arity,
number of arguments) greater than or equal to 0. These are ...
2
votes
0answers
90 views
Quine, subjective probability and QM
I have just read Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist where Quine says:
“Probability? Of events? Restore extensionality (...). Of states of affairs? Treat quotationally, like de dicto. How much ...
4
votes
2answers
915 views
How do we know that Wyman and McX aren't the same person?
Quine thought that only that which exists can be referred to, or in other words 'to be is to be the value of a bound variable'.
However, what of his equally famous fictional characters Wyman and McX?...
9
votes
2answers
477 views
What is Quine's response to Parmenides's argument against change?
I was recently reading Russell's chapter on Parmenides in The History of Western Philosophy, and I came across a fun little argument for the absence of change. Essentially, it says that word meaning ...
5
votes
1answer
227 views
What is Quine's perspective on probability?
I am curious about what Quine's perspective on probability may be and if we can say that the quinean viewpoint on modality can be considered similar to his viewpoint on probability.
Is probability ...
5
votes
1answer
229 views
Why can we not reduce necessity to analyticity?
Why can’t we eliminate talk of necessity and possible worlds, for talk of analyticity and (non-modal) logical consistency? Has there been any attempt in recent times to do this? I'm not 100% sure, but ...
2
votes
0answers
104 views
Is Kuhn referring to Quine's holism while developing his later Semantic Incommensurability Thesis?
Kuhn's view as expressed in the passage quoted above depends upon meaning holism—the claim that the meanings of terms are interrelated in such a way that changing the meaning of one term results in ...
2
votes
1answer
53 views
What did Kuhn exactly say about the inscrutability of reference?
Early on Kuhn drew a parallel with Quine's thesis of the indeterminacy of translation (1970a, 202; 1970c, 268). According to the latter, if we are translating one language into another, there are ...
2
votes
0answers
112 views
In which sense Quine denies that the translated expressions do have a meaning?
Early on Kuhn drew a parallel with Quine's thesis of the indeterminacy of translation (1970a, 202; 1970c, 268). According to the latter, if we are translating one language into another, there are ...
4
votes
1answer
151 views
Quine “Ontological Relativity”
I am completely new to Quine's theories and thank you for your patience in answering my novice questions.
In his paper "Ontological Relativity", Quine says:
Consider the case of a thoughtful ...
5
votes
2answers
337 views
why Bertrand Russell's paradox had such a high impact and relevance?
The paradox of Bertrand Russell he formulated in 1918, I believe, has undermined the attempt to found mathematics on a strictly logical basis. I remember that an intuitive way of putting the paradox ...
2
votes
2answers
135 views
Could someone help me out with Quine's theory of ontological commitment?
I'm kind of struggling with this. My prof gave an example of the problem of whether or not holes exist.
In the case of a colander, a realist about holes could say that a colander is metal that has ...
1
vote
1answer
54 views
is the world a set of everything that exists? Any quotation?
The way I understood first-order-logic with quinean metaontology is, that a world is the set of everything that exists. Now I'm searching for a quote. I looked at some texts from Russell and at On ...
6
votes
1answer
489 views
Does Quine's dissolution of the Analytic/Synthetic distinction challenge mathematical realism?
I was surprised to learn that Quine is a mathematical realist (See this interview for example). I always assumed that his "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" and specifically his dissolution of the Analytic/...
8
votes
3answers
527 views
What are the relations between externalism (Kripke, Putnam) and holism (Quine) about meaning?
Three points are not clear to me about the relations between semantic externalism (Kripke, Putnam) and holism (Quine):
Is there a way according to which externalism and holism can be held together or ...
3
votes
1answer
292 views
Quine on Necessity
Lately, I have been reading some of Quine's works on modality. I can't help but feel that many of his pronouncements on modality are wrong/misguided, although pinpointing exactly where is goes wrong ...
7
votes
1answer
889 views
How do Kripke's rigid designators and the necessity of identity relate to the Duhem-Quine thesis?
The Duhem-Quine thesis refers to the underdetermination of scientific theories and the fact that it is impossible to test scientific theories in isolation, we always need to make background ...
8
votes
1answer
1k views
Do Wittgenstein and Quine give the same criticisms of semantics?
What is the connection between the criticisms offered by Wittgenstein and Quine of meaning and language? Are both philosophers generally criticizing the same semantic theories with similar arguments, ...
8
votes
1answer
343 views
Are there serious challenges to the 'principle of charity' as presented by Donald Davidson?
Donald Davidson's formulation of the "principle of charity" is based on Quine's "radical interpretation" (I believe from the book Word & Object), and he formulates it in a way that considers its ...
2
votes
1answer
157 views
Quine - Two dogmas of empiricism - status of mathematics [duplicate]
If we do away with the analytic-synthetic distinction as per Quine, does that mean that mathematics is no more certain than empirical science?
And how does mathematical proof proceed if we don't use ...
3
votes
0answers
97 views
Difference between Carnap and Quine's views
Could someone explain to me, in easy language, what the main differences are between Carnap and Quine's views regarding internal / external questions and realism? Quine called Carnap a Platoist, yet I ...
5
votes
2answers
569 views
If one agrees with Quine's dissolution of the Analytic/Synthetic distinction, what is left of Kant's epistemology?
One of Kant's most important (if not the most important) result is his argument (proof?) that synthetic a priori knowledge is possible.
If one agrees with Quine's argument against Analyticity as ...
4
votes
1answer
192 views
What is knowledge for Quine? What is the criterion for determining what knowledge is and isn't?
Quine's holism is marked by a scientific methodology. Perhaps not all beliefs in Quine's web of belief are accurate, but at its best the web consists of the refined, matured string of beliefs which ...
1
vote
1answer
230 views
Two questions on Quine's philosophy of science
These are fairly straight forward question to which I have found no answers. Years ago, when I was taking a seminar on Quine, the professor explained Quine's philosophy of science. According to Quine, ...
9
votes
2answers
374 views
Quine on higher set theory
In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, Stewart Shapiro states in his introductory section:
Quine himself accepts mathematics (as true) only to the extent that it is applied ...
3
votes
1answer
203 views
How important are Quine and Feyerabend to the philosophy of science and the demarcation problem?
I've listened to two sets of lectures on the philosophy of science that treat Quine's results on underdetermination, the dissolution of the analytic/synthetic distinction, and confirmation holism as ...
1
vote
0answers
100 views
The scope of Analytic discussion about sentences
Kripke and Quine argue both for 2 different ideas (about which I will write shortly) but their objectives are common - to say something about the nature of sentences. Yet, It seems to me like they don'...
14
votes
1answer
587 views
How does Quine answer the metaphysician's charge that scientism is self-refuting?
General scientism seems to hold that due to the predictive powers of our scientific methods, such methods are preferred to other methods of knowledge, such as metaphysics (radical scientism claiming ...
8
votes
2answers
948 views
What is Quine's rebuttal to Grice and Strawson's In Defense of Dogma?
In response to Quine's rejection of the analytic-synthetic distinction, Strawson and Grice appear to reduce Quine's rejection (or skepticism) of synonymy to a rejection of meaning. What is/would be ...
3
votes
1answer
290 views
Is Quine's epistemology really just a linguistic reinterpretation of Kant's?
Kant's epistemology: There are facts out there, but we can never access them directly, we can only perceive them the way they are presented to us by our own minds.
Quine: There are facts out there, ...
5
votes
1answer
134 views
When Quine is criticizing the notion of analyticity what exactly is his criterion?
Quine criticizes analyticity for presupposing another notion, that of synonymy, which for Quine either must be explained in terms of analyticity or synonymy itself.
But what exactly does Quine think ...
1
vote
0answers
51 views
Is Quine begging the question against the traditional epistemologist?
Quine's naturalistic holism is marked by the idea that our methodology should be concerned with empirical data as understood by modern science in conjunction with the idea that every theory is ...
6
votes
2answers
357 views
Does Quine consider the Homeric gods to have predictive power?
Quine wrote in his 1951 paper "Two Dogmas of Empiricism":
"Physical objects are conceptually imported into the situation as convenient intermediaries not by definition in terms of experience, but ...
8
votes
0answers
102 views
How does Quine effectively shift from points he has made about knowledge acquisition to conclusions he makes about knowledge simpliciter?
Quine propagated forward an approach to epistemology wherein there was no need of any sort of justification "beyond observation and the hypothetico-deductive method" (Quine 1981).
Quine is going ...
3
votes
1answer
191 views
Why is “similarity” not a logical relation? (from “Natural Kinds” by Quine)
I have two questions regarding Quine's paper “Natural Kinds”:
Why isn't similarity a logical relation?
Why is our ability to recognize similarity so fundamental?
These two things are explained in ...
2
votes
2answers
82 views
Did Quine have another reason to be skeptical of reference besides its context-dependence?
Quine, like many others before him, thought that the meaning of words depends on the context they are in.
But what compelled Quine to hold that in light of this there is an ambiguity as to what any ...
