Skip to main content

Questions tagged [transcendental-idealism]

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
-1 votes
2 answers
71 views

Can Kant be compatible with panpsychism?

Is the transcendental idealism compatible with panpsychism, The view that all things have consciousness?
Angotpf's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
77 views

Gardner's presentation of Kant on Skepticism

I am working (slowly) through the Critique of Pure Reason, reading Sebastian Gardner's Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason as a secondary source (among others), and ...
Conan G.'s user avatar
  • 211
1 vote
2 answers
98 views

a Solution to The Problem Of Casuality and Thing-in-Themselves (Problem of Affection)

i have been interested in "the problem of affection" in Transcendental Idealism for a while now and a possible solution came to my mind, Kant says that TIT Causes our Phenomena as if TIT (...
Parsa Fakhar's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
90 views

Kant: Sensibility

I am currently reading through Immanuel Kant: Key Concepts, edited by Dudley and Engelhard, in preparation for tackling the Prolomegna and (possibly) the Critique of Pure Reason, and I am a bit stuck ...
Conan G.'s user avatar
  • 211
4 votes
3 answers
165 views

is there any inconsistancy if i claim thing-in-itselmselves are giving our mind "causality"?

i'm simply testing this out the "problem of affection" in kant happens because kant says causality is an apriori knowledge can't we just say, thing-in-itself gives us "causality" ...
Parsa Fakhar's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
137 views

Problem of Affection in Kant's Thing in themselves as Causes, Neo Kantians and Post Kantians Responses

We all know "the problem of affection" raised by Schulze: "if causality is apriori structure of the mind and exist inside the mind, how can we claim thing-in-themselves cause phenomena ...
Parsa Fakhar's user avatar
6 votes
5 answers
597 views

Scott Aikin's "modest, but not self-effacing" transcendental argument

This question is about Scott F. Aikin's 2017 paper "Modest (but not Self-Effacing) Transcendental Arguments". The full paper is accessible here with a free account, and some ideas regarding ...
viuser's user avatar
  • 4,911
4 votes
1 answer
60 views

Kantian Subjectivism Contradiction?

Kant rendered the judgments of reason as subjective, neither narrating nor accurately reflecting the reality of things. "We only sense from external objects, thus perception does not express ...
Sam's user avatar
  • 55
4 votes
1 answer
119 views

Is Conscious Awareness of Phenomenal Experience a Correlate of the Constitutive Activity of Kant's Reason?

In the introduction to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason by Marcus Weigelt, Weigelt writes, "Reason, although sometimes understood as the faculty that encompasses all thought (for instance when we ...
Aditya Verma's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
484 views

Does the Transcendental Dialectic destroy science?

Long story short, probably the most remarkable contribution of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is the notion that the subject plays an important role on the definition of the object. However, if the ...
RodolfoAP's user avatar
  • 7,890
5 votes
2 answers
164 views

Can there be such a thing as pure a priori thinking?

Having read Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, and in fact just finishing a second read after some time, I've been trying to develop a suitable "worldview" about the structure of the mind. I ...
DanielFBest's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
174 views

To what extent is Nietzsche an "Idealist?"

I am well aware of Nietzsche's prolonged and often prolific critiques of what he referred to as "Idealism," yet I am curious as to the extent which two of his ideas in particular, namely ...
Golden Ratio's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
244 views

What did Kant mean by "pure physics"?

Early in the Prolegomena, Kant says that both pure mathematics and pure physics are examples of a priori cognition. What exactly did he mean by "pure physics"?
Gerry's user avatar
  • 789