Questions tagged [wittgenstein]
Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (1889 – 1951) was an Austrian-British philosopher, professor in philosophy at the University of Cambridge (1939-1947). He worked in foundations of mathematics and on mathematical logic, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of language. He played a central, if controversial, role in 20th-century analytic philosophy.
268
questions
3
votes
0
answers
76
views
Can we conclude from Wittgenstein that all philosophy shows just as well that all philosophy is nonsense?
There's been a lot of skeptical questions recently, about knowledge, god, probability, other minds, all sorts of crazy stuff (I'm still waiting for "nothing is true")
Can we conclude from ...
- 549
4
votes
4
answers
198
views
How serious are believers in the private language argument?
From time to time I come across people who endorse Wittgenstein's notion that language is a fundamentally public activity, and that a private language would be meaningless.
I always feel somewhat ...
- 10.7k
1
vote
2
answers
73
views
What is the crux of Wittgenstein’s PLA?
I’m reading Appiah’s Thinking it Through and I am having a little bit of trouble understanding grasping his statement of the crux of the private language argument(s). In particular, I don't understand ...
- 181
2
votes
1
answer
89
views
The private language argument and Descartes's private thoughts
In his "Thinking it Through" textbook, Appiah writes
It is a big step from saying that some of our mental states are things that other people can know about, to saying, with the ...
- 181
0
votes
1
answer
48
views
Going against the limits of language
I vaguely remember a sentence of Wittgenstein which was about the duty of philosophy: that is, to go against the limits of the language. This was in his late period of philosophy.
What is the precise ...
- 117
1
vote
0
answers
57
views
Is mysticism a confusion of language?
Is mysticism a confusion of language, in Wittgenstein's sense? You'd have thought it was, especially if it makes any positive claims. But does it not ever "show" things, ever?
user66760
4
votes
1
answer
104
views
Wittgenstein on indeterminate boundaries
Wittgenstein, for instance, urged that “an indefinite boundary is not
really a boundary at all” (1953: 45e).
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/vagueness/
What did he make of the Sorites paradox, ...
user66697
2
votes
3
answers
121
views
How would Wittgenstein explain the ability of blind people to learn a language?
It we take Wittgensteins picture theory of language for granted,
The picture theory of meaning states that statements are meaningful if, and only if, they can be defined or pictured in the real world
...
- 2,112
1
vote
2
answers
100
views
"This seems to abolish logic, but does not do so."
If language is to be a means of communication there must be agreement
not only in definitions but also (queer as this may sound) in
judgements. This seems to abolish logic, but does not do so. -- It ...
- 159
2
votes
1
answer
126
views
Was Wittgenstein a mathematical finitist?
Wittgenstein was a notorious critic of set theory, calling it "laughable nonsense". However, he also wholeheartedly rejected intuitionist logic of Brouwer and Weyl, saying "it is ...
- 1,247
1
vote
2
answers
166
views
What was Wittgenstein's real motive for wanting to move to Russia?
Ludwig Wittgenstein was no doubt a fascinating genius who was also very mysterious. He was known for doing outrageous things that no one saw coming, and there is one episode in particular that I find ...
- 1,247
2
votes
5
answers
107
views
Can we reduce Wittgenstein's claims of human language being limited by some actual propositions about the limits of language?
Wittgenstein argued that there are limits to what language can do, and that our attempts to use language to describe the world can sometimes lead us into confusion and error. He believed that many ...
- 3,807
1
vote
1
answer
72
views
Does Wittgenstein's picture theory contradict Frege's theory of Sinn and Bedeutung?
The picture theory of meaning states that statements are meaningful if, and only if, they can be defined or pictured in the real world.
The very notion of meaning as used here is argued against by ...
- 2,112
-1
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Can you be objectively offended?
Example:
Person A is talking to person B and uses a phrase that B is offended by. Person A is unapologetic because they personally don't take offense to that phrase and feel taking offense to it is ...
1
vote
1
answer
94
views
What does argument 4.0411 in the TLP mean?
This whole paragraph 4.0411 in the TLP makes no sense(in the non-Wittgenstein sense :D ) to me and I will quote it and add my questions.
If, for example, we wanted to express what we now write as ‘(x)...
- 13
0
votes
2
answers
195
views
Wittgenstein like analysis of Carl Jung's work?
So I've been skeptical of Jung's ideas. More so because one of the philosophical moves Wittgenstein makes is: considering the possibility that just because you can grammatically string a bunch of ...
- 1,694
2
votes
1
answer
153
views
Help needed in understanding an excerpt from PI (Section 509)
What if we asked someone, “In what sense are these words a description of what you see?” — and he answers: “I mean this by these words.” (Perhaps he was looking at a landscape.) Why is this answer “I ...
- 373
17
votes
8
answers
6k
views
Is "This sentence is written in English" nonsense?
Wittgenstein and many others have said that our language gives the appearance of truth to some nonsense.
Do you think the very simple "This sentence is written in English." is such nonsense ...
- 330
8
votes
2
answers
808
views
Neo-liberalism, language and freedom?
Background
Byung Chulhan in his book psychopolitics defines freedom in two ways:
a. He defines it as an interlude which the subject feels when passing between lifestyles or ideologies. This is a ...
- 1,694
3
votes
2
answers
345
views
What does the emergence of different interpretations of Wittgenstein signify?
So I was listening to this Podcast about Wittgenstein the speakers are the Professor of Philosophy of University of South Hampton - Ray Monk, Senior Lecturer of University of York - Mary Macgin and ...
- 1,694
2
votes
1
answer
96
views
Is Wittgenstein's proposition "the world is a collection of facts not things" similar to Hegel's claim that objects are not things but forces?
They both seem to suggest that objects are not defined by their discrete appearances but rather by the conceptual framework which allows us to perceive them. In case of Wittgenstein the world is all ...
- 379
0
votes
2
answers
229
views
Can set theory be non-extensional?
Here is Juliet Floyd stating "Wittgenstein's non-extensionalism, like Russell's in Principia, precluded development of an extensional theory of the infinite (set theory). https://youtu.be/...
- 2,302
0
votes
1
answer
63
views
Does Wittgenstein rule-following mean everything is defined as what a human is supposed do with it? What does it say about ontology?
To me rule-following is a very “homespun” way to explain logic, math, and language. Meaning the social-communicative aspect of “rule-following” provides an explanation for informal and formal language ...
- 2,302
0
votes
3
answers
303
views
What are Ludwig Wittgenstein's greatest accomplishments?
I have heard a lot about Ludwig Wittgenstein, but what are his greatest accomplishments? I tried looking up on Wikipedia but didn't understand much.
- 17
1
vote
0
answers
230
views
What was Wittgenstein's view on happiness?
I was wondering whether Wittgenstein is a proponent of happiness being central to a life well lived. Generally, from Ronald Suter's article and what I've read about him, Id wager the answer is yes. ...
- 479
2
votes
1
answer
202
views
What motivates Wittgenstein’s declaration of the world as the totality of facts?
The world is everything that is the case.
I understand “the case” to merely be an informal way of saying “that which is true”.
1.1 The world is the totality of facts, not of things.
I am curious if ...
- 116
0
votes
2
answers
126
views
Is there true and false poetic fancy?
Concerning the famous phrase of Wittgenstein "whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent", we can confidently speak and say, e.g., that gravity varies with the inverse square of ...
- 341
2
votes
2
answers
394
views
What is the correct Wittgenstein analysis of this claim?
So I'm confused by the following. Let's say someone makes the claim:
Math is also a language game.
I can imagine 2 different kind of responses Wittgenstein might say:
Indeed, it suffices to only ...
- 1,694
10
votes
5
answers
2k
views
Why was Russell discontent with Wittgenstein's view on "logic as tautologies"?
While reading Logicomix, I came across a scene that I don't quite understand.
Russell: ...Logicians are creating elaborate ways to "say the same things in different words"...this "...
- 373
1
vote
1
answer
239
views
Please explain Wittgenstein's views on ethics?
In Lecture on Ethics Wittgenstein said
I at once see clearly, as it were in a flash of light, not only that
no description that I can think of would do to describe what I mean by
absolute value, but ...
- 111
3
votes
2
answers
198
views
Does the second Wittgenstein still consider philosophical questions to be meaningless?
In his logico-philosophical treatise, if I have understood correctly, Wittgenstein proposes a demonstration of the fact that philosophical questions are not real problems but the result of ...
user49505
0
votes
2
answers
337
views
What did Wittgenstein mean by "Light dawns gradually over the whole."?
I agree with Wittgenstein that "we seldom learn new propositions piecemeal; rather we acquire propositional knowledge in holistic clusters". When I study math from a textbook, I definitely ...
user8572
0
votes
1
answer
243
views
Why the linguistic turn at early 20th century? Why not the physics/psychology turn? [closed]
Early 20th century philosophy went through a "linguistic turn", presumably due to developments in mathematical logic by Frege and Russell, followed by Wittgenstein's work.
However, in the ...
0
votes
2
answers
259
views
Introductory lectures to Wittgenstein's ideas
can anyone recommend me a course on YouTube that explains the ideas of Ludwig Wittgenstein in an introductory manner. Thank you
- 417
0
votes
1
answer
54
views
What is the minimum feature structure for a valid family resemblance definition?
As part of a research project, I am trying to better understand Wittgenstein's family resemblance definitions. I have come across various interpretations of this idea and I want to check my ...
- 113
0
votes
0
answers
51
views
Review articles on the rule-following paradox
Except for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (SEP) article on private language, I am having a hard time finding review articles (or book chapters) on the rule-following paradox.
What review ...
- 9
0
votes
4
answers
408
views
Relationship between early Wittgenstein and late Wittgenstein
I think most books treat his early and late theories as inconsistent theories, in a sense that one can agree on either his early or late theory, but not both. However, I think the two theories are ...
- 373
1
vote
1
answer
151
views
According to Wittgenstein, why are the laws of logic valid?
According to Wittgenstein's tractatus,
A fact is composed of atomic facts.
An atomic fact corresponds to an elemental proposition. (Picture theory)
A proposition is a series of elemental propositions ...
- 373
0
votes
2
answers
100
views
Help with the details and source of an anecdote, Wittgenstein and Carnap on the paranormal
There is an anecdote in which the participants were Wittgenstein and Carnap (or Hempel). One of the two had a book on parapsychology/paranormal stuff. The other scolded him for this. The book owner ...
- 11
1
vote
1
answer
234
views
How did Wittgenstein "cure" Anscombe of phenomenalism?
In "Collected Philosophical Papers Volume 2: Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind", Elizabeth Anscombe wrote the following:
I always hated phenomenalism and felt trapped by it. I couldn’t ...
- 159
4
votes
2
answers
147
views
Where and from whom can I learn about Wittgenstein's family resemblance?
After reading the relevant Wikipedia article as well as the relevant Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article, I still feel like I need a gentle introduction to Wittgenstein's Philosophical ...
- 41
1
vote
1
answer
72
views
Which philosophers did the young Wittgenstein meet as a child?
According to Wikipedia
The family was at the center of Vienna's cultural life; Bruno Walter described the life at the Wittgensteins' palace as an "all-pervading atmosphere of humanity and ...
- 111
1
vote
1
answer
85
views
Do we have any finding that supports Wittgenstein's claim that there are no properties, but only objects and their interactions?
Do we have any finding that supports Wittgenstein's claim that there are no properties, but only objects and their interactions? Wittgenstein said that there are only simple atoms and their ...
- 3,807
0
votes
0
answers
208
views
What, if anything, has post-positivism left standing as the legacy of Frege’s Begriffsschriftis, Russel’s Principia, and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus
The goal of both Russel’s Principia (1910) and Frege’s Begriffsschriftis (1879) ["a formula language, modeled on that of arithmetic, for pure thought."] was essentially to defend the ...
- 1,855
0
votes
0
answers
58
views
Confidence margin for logical verification
I'm starting to read Wittgenstein and I keep circling around a problem, which I'll lay out with the following ideas:
a. Logical space is the totality of external reality.
b. A proposition is logical ...
- 101
2
votes
4
answers
250
views
Tractatus Proposition 1 -- nominal or real?
In Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, the opening proposition can be read as a definition:
The world is everything that is the case.
As such, which kind of definition is it: nominal, or ...
- 239
0
votes
1
answer
166
views
What is meant by "Sense of the World" (TLP)?
Wittgenstein defines World as:
TLP: World is the totality of facts, not of things.
Clearly, Wittgenstein is referring to the mental "representation" of the World, not the physical World ...
- 1,065
1
vote
3
answers
190
views
Is this passage about Wittgenstein misprinted or am I simply misreading it?
This question relates to the correctness of a particular passage from Time of the Magicians by Wolfram Eilenberger and translated by Shaun Whiteside, which describes a decade of philosophical thought ...
- 119
2
votes
2
answers
177
views
Section 50 in Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations
Can anyone explain the argument in section 50 of PI, as it seems important enough not to gloss over (that "if this thing did not exist we could not use it in our language game- - what looks like ...
user62233
1
vote
1
answer
54
views
Tractatus differences
Wittgenstein's Tractatus was first published in 1921 and then republished, with an English translation, in 1922. A second edition came out in the early 1930s with a few differences from the first. ...
- 21