All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
-1 votes
0 answers
4 views

Does the argument by analogy in favor of the existence of other minds lead to solipsism?

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/other-minds/#ArguAnal I can't understand the article. Here it is said that the argument by analogy inevitably leads to solipsism. Then it is said that the argument ...
Arnold's user avatar
  • 421
-1 votes
0 answers
3 views

Has any thought be done on correspondences between logical expressiveness and ontological expressiveness?

There are hierarchies of logics that I’m still trying to understand. https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relation+between+type+theory+and+category+theory#Overview It is one thing to study how their logical ...
Julius Hamilton's user avatar
-1 votes
0 answers
8 views

Material implication as a partial operator?

Influenced by Speakpigeon’s unrelenting challenging of material implication, I was wondering if there is a formalization which treats it as a partial Boolean operator, like so: p | q | p -> q —-|———...
Julius Hamilton's user avatar
-1 votes
0 answers
26 views

Is there circular reasoning here? What type of reasoning does this belong to?

Is there circular reasoning here? What type of argument is this: abduction (inference to best explanation) or analogy? I know from my experience how people who have mental states should behave. ...
Arnold's user avatar
  • 421
-1 votes
0 answers
17 views

What are the criteria of explanatory power?

What are the criteria of explanatory power? What are the criteria of explanatory power? I can't find the criteria. In the case of solipsism and the existence of other conditions, the assessment of the ...
Arnold's user avatar
  • 421
0 votes
1 answer
32 views

Wittgenstein and the primary elements

What does it mean to say that we can attribute neither being nor non-being to the elements? One might say: if everything that we call “being” and “non-being” consists in the obtaining and non-...
Егор Галыкин's user avatar
3 votes
4 answers
68 views

Does standard quantum mechanics imply anti realism?

In quantum entanglement, there is something called a joint wave function that describes the state of the two particles entangled. At measurement, this mysteriously “collapses” into an actual outcome, ...
Alejandro's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
52 views

Why not just give up on the idea of truth-functionality?

I understand that today only a minority of academics who are specialised in formal logic accept the horseshoe (aka "Classical Logic" or "First-Order Logic") as an accurate, or even ...
Speakpigeon's user avatar
  • 7,638
1 vote
0 answers
26 views

Which author(s) first talked of Aristotle's syllogistic as a logic of terms?

Which author(s) first talked of Aristotle's syllogistic as a logic of terms? Thank you for any scholarly references. Aristotle does defines the notion of "term" in Prior Analytics: I call a ...
Speakpigeon's user avatar
  • 7,638
4 votes
4 answers
109 views

What do we mean when we ask "What's the – fundamental – nature of reality?"

This is a very popular question within metaphysics and I'd like to understand what do we are really mean with the question. In particular, what do we mean when we use the words "fundamental" ...
Jon's user avatar
  • 149
1 vote
3 answers
581 views

How do physicists talk about spin of individual particles when the universe is massively entangled?

The following two things seem to be true: (1) The universe is massively entangled because the wave function that describes the entire universe has measure 1 of being entangled. Further, given how ...
zzz's user avatar
  • 136
9 votes
7 answers
954 views

Does the success of AI (Large Language Models) support Wittgenstein's position that "meaning is use"?

By 'success' we think of current AI/LLMs capacity of producing text that is regarded as coherent, informative, even convincing, by human readers [see for instance Spitale et al. and Salvi et al.] ...
ac15's user avatar
  • 1,361
2 votes
1 answer
37 views

Distinction between classical essential (primary) and non-essential (secondary) properties of matter vs. modern primary-secondary qualities?

Primary qualities according to modernity (Galileo, Descartes, Hobbes) are qualities that are quantitative/mathematical. Everything else cannot be reduced to mathematics—e.g., a sensible is a secondary ...
ashadow4u's user avatar
4 votes
3 answers
558 views

Wittgenstein and tautology

What does it mean to say that we can attribute neither being nor non-being to the elements? One might say: if everything that we call “being” and “non-being” consists in the obtaining and non-...
Егор Галыкин's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
94 views

Who was the philosopher whose lectures prompted suicide(s)?

I vaguely remember from the course on the History of Philosophy that a well-known philosopher has once given public lectures, after which some people commited suicides. His point of view given during ...
Unlikely's user avatar
14 votes
10 answers
4k views

Is Alzheimer’s disease evidence for the non-existence of the soul?

As Alzheimer's disease kills off neurons, a person's personality and cognitive abilities gradually fade away. Doesn't this suggest that the self or "soul" is simply an emergent property of ...
Mathematician prime's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
46 views

If past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior, can we surmise that known past and present behavior is the best estimate for unknown past?

A discussion about the ever increasing earth population made me wonder about the world population in the past, when such things could not be recorded. If we accept that past behavior is truly the best ...
terramac's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
35 views

What do we mean by "philosophy "? Can anything be a subject of philosophy?

At what point does philosophy become physics or psychology or something else? Can there be, for example, a "philosophy of dogs"? I'm guessing not, because it is too narrow, but because ...
Gerry's user avatar
  • 759
2 votes
3 answers
240 views

If A is justified in believing in X based on their personal experience, can B also be justified in believing in X based on A's testimony?

The title already expresses the question perfectly well, so I don't see much point in complicating the question further, beyond including a few thought-provoking examples below: Example 1: The ...
Mark's user avatar
  • 4,981
1 vote
1 answer
112 views

What do we mean by 'obligation'?

I've been thinking about what we mean by obligation, and I've come up with the following: What is an obligation? It is clear that obligation cannot be anything to do with being coerced by someone ...
A-Level Student's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
43 views

Are there circular reasoning in these explanations?

Other people have minds like mine because: 1. Other people have minds like mine: other people are biologically very similar to me the behavior of other people is very similar to my behavior. my ...
Arnold's user avatar
  • 421
6 votes
2 answers
412 views

Who coined the use of the word "entailment" in the logical sense?

Who coined the use of the word entailment in the logical sense? And to mean what exactly? Thank you for any scholarly reference. EDIT For example, there is a definition of "semantic entailment&...
Speakpigeon's user avatar
  • 7,638
0 votes
2 answers
72 views

What is causation?

I suppose the common idea of “causation” to me seems like it is supposed to reduce to physical causation, at least this is a standard worldview in modern times. In other words, the implied metaphysics ...
Julius Hamilton's user avatar
-1 votes
0 answers
29 views

Does iff suggest that there are no ethical egoists unless psychological egoism is true?

Most people would agree that something that is in my interests can be so because you want it to happen. So why is what someone else wants valuable? According to ethical egoism, because it's good for ...
user66697's user avatar
  • 800
3 votes
2 answers
293 views

Are all arguments for the existence of other minds circular?

The argument from analogy and the best explanation argument (IBE) rely on the claim that my mental states are responsible for my behavior and then conclude that the behavior of other people is caused ...
Arnold's user avatar
  • 421
9 votes
4 answers
1k views

Does the current “ruling ontology” deny any possibility of a social causation of mental illness?

Mark Fisher in his book Capitalist Realism writes: The current ruling ontology denies any possibility of a social causation of mental illness. Fisher then goes on to say that the construct of “...
Muhhamedbinghazi's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
24 views

Yeats refers to a common soul in the occult tradition. What might he be referring to?

Yeats takes for granted the conception of the destiny of the human soul that is “common to the occult tradition. What is this destiny that occult traditions commonly agree the soul has? And because &...
Gerry's user avatar
  • 759
-7 votes
1 answer
50 views

What are the benefits of smoking marijuana? [closed]

I could ask this on Psychology SE but I feel like approaching it from a more philosophical angle. It is really common for people to cite scientific research like “phenomenon X has correlation Y” (like,...
Julius Hamilton's user avatar
-1 votes
2 answers
125 views

What does it mean for something to be "explained"?

Suppose I claim that things fall to the ground due to a force known as gravity. Is that explanation satisfactory? Or if I propose that molecules collided randomly, leading to the formation of the ...
Mark's user avatar
  • 4,981
3 votes
1 answer
55 views

René Descartes' and Wittgenstein Doubt: Self and the Existence of Others?

Can one doubt their own existence in the world while simultaneously doubting the existence of others? If one's being isn't present because they aren't present themselves, wouldn't that make it ...
Hadibinalshiab's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
226 views

Are there cases where psychology has offered successful scientific explanations for phenomena that neuroscience hasn't?

Firstly, is there a distinction between a psychological explanation and a neuroscientific one for the same phenomenon? Imagine if I posed a question to the entire field of psychology, seeking the best ...
Mark's user avatar
  • 4,981
5 votes
2 answers
218 views

What exactly is the implausibility and unconvincingness of solipsism?

Solipsism is unconvincing and implausible because it is a complex and confusing explanation. Solipsism offers two different explanations for no reason at all: one for my behavior and one for other ...
Arnold's user avatar
  • 421
3 votes
2 answers
95 views

What are the responsibilities of humans towards nature and human race?

An individual has to carry out various duties and fulfill the responsibilities on various levels. I tried to figure out some possible roles humans play. I believe this is an exhaustive list (if I ...
Junsui's user avatar
  • 206
0 votes
0 answers
23 views

Are Wittgenstein's aesthetic and ethical claims during the Tractatus period meant to be descriptive or prescriptive?

Are Wittgenstein's aesthetic and ethical claims during the Tractatus period meant to be descriptive or prescriptive? I read it, followed the argument and forgot most of it, but I can recall that ...
user66697's user avatar
  • 800
0 votes
0 answers
24 views

Can this argument for particularism be applied to egoism?

https://wab.uib.no/agora/tools/alws/collection-8-issue-1-article-5.annotate how can we hold on to moral principles in the face of the seeming impossibility to formulate a moral principle which is ...
user66697's user avatar
  • 800
0 votes
2 answers
41 views

Private language argument as an argument against the self and so egosim

“The words of this language are to refer to what only the speaker can know — to his immediate private sensations. So another person cannot understand the language.”... Immediately after introducing ...
user66697's user avatar
  • 800
1 vote
2 answers
119 views

Whose perspective on evidence is correct: Hitchens's razor or Carl Sagan's? [closed]

Hitchens's razor states, "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence," while Carl Sagan argues, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." ...
Stellan Coder's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
40 views

What amount of egoism is natural, even necessary, even moral?

In his second theorem in the Critique of Practical Reason, Kant states that a rational being's consciousness of the agreeableness of life accompanying his whole existence is happiness, and the ...
Gerry's user avatar
  • 759
0 votes
1 answer
46 views

Can a necessitarian still believe in this notion of possibility?

I am a necessitarian, meaning, I believe that the only thing that is possible is what actually happens. The reason for that is because I don't believe any possible world except this one exists. ...
user107952's user avatar
  • 6,806
8 votes
3 answers
324 views

Can the law of non-contradiction exist without the law of identity?

Lately I've been reading about Quentin Meillassoux, and it seems that the only law of logic he doesn't see as contingent is the law of non-contradiction, because if the world is what it is not, then ...
edelex's user avatar
  • 712
0 votes
0 answers
43 views

Is B(p) V B(~p) an instance of LEM in doxastic logic?

So in classical logic either p is T or p is F. But is it same in doxastic logic, ie, is B(p) V B(~p) an instance of LEM? And the second issue, is it equivalent to B(p) V ~B(p)?
Vihan 's user avatar
  • 121
3 votes
3 answers
48 views

stuck! first order logic - identities (specifically "only")

Please correct me on why these may be wrong(identities). I've tried many times but it seems I'm missing something. for they key: M(x) = is a moon, O(x,y) = x orbits y, and m = mars, e = earth Only ...
acey's user avatar
  • 31
1 vote
2 answers
83 views

Wittgenstein's chess example

When one shows someone the king in chess and says “This is the king”, one does not thereby explain to him the use of this piece a unless he already knows the rules of the game except for this last ...
Егор Галыкин's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
46 views
+50

Are the noumena and phenomena worlds or perspectives? (According to Kant)

Among the peculiarities of phenomena, Kant’s premise is that he is unable to comprehend any meaning that describes what is beyond sense. Even sensible things will be invisible to the mind, and ...
Muhhamedbinghazi's user avatar
9 votes
9 answers
6k views

Why do most philosophers believe in a deterministic formulation of quantum mechanics?

After stumbling upon this recent survey from 2020, it is interesting to see that the most popular position (apart from being undecided) is hidden variables at 21.94%. As a reminder, a hidden-variable ...
Baby_philosopher's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
52 views

Do things that always existed require less explanation than things that do?

This came up from a recent discussion I was having with Conifold where I started wondering: do facts about reality that don’t seem to “start” and just potentially always existed (such as the “...
Baby_philosopher's user avatar
5 votes
4 answers
411 views

Does physicalism imply that an explanation for consciousness is a category error?

Every time we create an explanation for something in the physical world we represent the world with objects with various different structures and properties etc. We then relate these structures to ...
Baby_philosopher's user avatar
2 votes
5 answers
125 views

Would being in a simulation explain why we have regularities?

Would being in a simulation explain why reality exhibits regularities or would that just bring the question back a notch and ask how that simulation came about? We live in a world that seems to be ...
Baby_philosopher's user avatar
-1 votes
0 answers
49 views

Are the wicked happier than the virtuous?

Are the wicked happier than the virtuous? Has any philosopher defended the claim that evil does pay, insofar as for most of us a vicious existence makes most people happier than their virtuous ...
user66697's user avatar
  • 800
9 votes
1 answer
177 views

Is it a common misunderstanding to claim that Kant considered time and space to be illusion?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nSS2XgWMAE Is it a common misunderstanding to claim that Kant considered time and space to be illusion? People don't seem to agree on this and some people claim that ...
Sayaman's user avatar
  • 4,019

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
436