160
votes
Why do they say I am committing a fallacy when I am just insulting someone?
Because they expect arguments, not inflammatory noise
No, I am calling them an idiot because that's ... just my bloody opinion.
Exactly that: just your opinion. An opinion is not an argument; it ...
77
votes
Why do they say I am committing a fallacy when I am just insulting someone?
If an opinion isn't intended as an argument, it is noise
Frankly, nobody wants to hear your opinion unless you have some point to make about it.
You can have the opinion that a person is an idiot, ...
75
votes
Accepted
Logical fallacy: X is bad, Y is worse, thus X is not bad
This is (at least a subset of) the fallacy of relative privation.
From Wikipedia >> List of Fallacies >> Red herring fallacies
Fallacy of relative privation ("not as bad as") – dismissing an
...
73
votes
Accepted
If the Bible contains circular reasoning, does it discredit it?
Circular reasoning doesn't "discredit" any point of view --if anything, it demonstrates internal consistency. However, it also doesn't provide any external support for a point of view. It has no ...
69
votes
Accepted
Which fallacy: "If white privilege exists, why did Elizabeth Warren pretend to be an Indian?"
If you are so smart why aren't you rich? If this country is so bad why don't you leave? If it is so easy why aren't you doing it? These types of rhetorical barbs rely on what is called an enthymeme, ...
68
votes
If a person claims to know anything could it be disproven by saying 'prove that we are not in a simulation'?
The issue here, as it often is, is that colloquial English is horribly ambiguous, which makes any sort of precise and rigorous discussion difficult. But with sufficient effort, it is possible to make ...
68
votes
Is Yoda committing a fallacy?
The argument you're trying to formulate (as a rebuttal to Yoda) is this:
do successfully IMPLIES try
fail to do IMPLIES try
THEREFORE
(do successfully OR fail to do) IMPLIES try
However, this ...
60
votes
Fallacy by Sherlock Holmes 'Eliminate the impossible, and what remains must be the truth'
There's a fallacy called Holmesian fallacy.
A Holmesian fallacy (also Sherlock Holmes fallacy or process of elimination fallacy) is a logical fallacy that occurs when some explanation is believed to ...
57
votes
Accepted
Is circular reasoning always a fallacy?
Geoffrey refers to feedback loops as a valid example of circular reasoning. This is not correct: they can be valid but they are not circular. Instead they are an example of reasoning by induction.
...
50
votes
Does the no true Scotsman fallacy apply to anti Stalinist etc. communism?
Marx, socialism and communism
Neither Marx nor Engels provided a blueprint for the socialist state. There could in their view be no such thing as a communist state since under communism, with no ...
50
votes
Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?
A fallacy in an argument requires that there be an argument at all.
What you're describing:
Then someone counters, "What do you mean by 'bites'? Define 'biting people'. Define 'dog'."
is not even ...
49
votes
I have trouble understanding this fallacy: "If A, then B. Therefore if not-B, then not-A."
There are multiple good answers here, including references to modus tollens and the contrapositive (both of which are correct).
What helps me understand this concept is a more intuitive/layman's ...
43
votes
Fallacy by Sherlock Holmes 'Eliminate the impossible, and what remains must be the truth'
Holmes' advice is correct if and only if you assume a complete search was done to list all possibilities before starting the elimination process.
Note that Sherlock Holmes is both incredibly observant,...
41
votes
Isn't the notion that everything will occur in an infinite timeline an example of the gambler's fallacy?
It looks like you've hit upon the concept of almost surely in probability theory. Something occurs "almost surely" if it happens with probability 1, but there still exist situations where that thing ...
41
votes
What is this logical fallacy? (Nothing new under the sun?)
Its a funny thing. Like David Blomstrom, I don't think this is actually a fallacy.
The trick is that, in order to have a logical fallacy, one must have a logical argument. This consists of premises ...
38
votes
Accepted
Is there a name for the fallacy whereby the other party to the debate only suggests, does not articulate, what their point is?
First, my standard observation that the term 'fallacy' is often misused. A fallacy, properly put, is a mistake in the structure of an argument that makes a claim invalid without considering the sense ...
38
votes
Is attacking an argument because it's machine generated an ad hominem fallacy?
It is fallacious to make the formal argument that a conclusion is false because of its provenance.
It not fallacious to dismiss an argument out of hand because it comes from a source which is well ...
36
votes
Is reductio ad absurdum a fallacy?
Reductio ad absurdum is not a fallacy. Rather, RAA is correct reasoning that exposes a fallacy. From the Logically Fallacious page for it:
[RAA is a] mode of argumentation or a form of argument in ...
36
votes
Is reductio ad absurdum a fallacy?
Your example is not a valid case of Reductio ad Absurdum. It's just an example of an absurd argument.
A real example would be:
Miles: "Copying a DVD is stealing"
Frank: "Why?"
Miles: "If ...
35
votes
Is there a fallacy about "appeal to 'big words'"?
One fallacy that might fit is proof by intimidation. Here is Bo Bennett's description:
Making an argument purposely difficult to understand in an attempt to intimidate your audience into accepting ...
35
votes
What type of rhetorical device is the offering of a source which is really long and not specifying what part of the source is relevant?
In general, if your opponent insists on claiming that her source provides substantiation in a way it clearly does not, that is false attribution, however, it should be noted that such a counterclaim ...
34
votes
What fallacy is assuming something is the case because of past events
This is not a fallacy, just the old problem of induction. A case of hasty generalisation would be to conclude that the witness tends to lie, if you have observed it two times in a row.
34
votes
Accepted
What kind of fallacy is it to say if abolition of something isn't possible, we shouldn't attempt to address it at all?
The fallacy is comparison to perfection. Commonly known as the Nirvana fallacy.
It is a common rhetorical maneuver. The person performing the move compares all opponents to perfection, finds them ...
33
votes
What fallacy is assuming something is the case because of past events
All informal fallacies take their force from their similarity to strong arguments. In this case, if you say "This boy lied 19 days in a row, therefore we have good reason to disbelieve him on Day 20,"...
33
votes
Accepted
Where is the fallacy here?
When you say "the phenomenon of cats being born into this world is natural," what that means is, "the phenomenon of cats being born into this world is part of the set of natural phenomena." In other ...
33
votes
Accepted
What is the name of this fallacy: 101 is either binary or decimal?
EDITED 9/11/2020
What is the name of this fallacy: Is 101 binary or decimal?
I prefer to call it the either-or fallacy, but it is also known as false dilemma among others. The idea is that a choice ...
33
votes
What is the name of the fallacy where people assume that complex ideas are automatically better?
If somebody said "your argument is simple, therefore it is wrong", that would definitely be a fallacy. But that is not what "your argument is too simplistic" is supposed to mean. ...
32
votes
Is there a name for this fallacy when someone says something is good by only pointing out the good things?
The specific fallacy is cherry picking evidence to support a conclusion.
This is one of the most common fallacies committed by people with actual intention to be rational and is based on the invalid ...
30
votes
Is "I cannot imagine a mechanism for X to happen, so X can never happen" a named logical fallacy?
This fallacy is generally called argument from incredulity, or argument from failure of imagination. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_from_incredulity It also is a subset of the argument from ...
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
Related Tags
fallacies × 777logic × 287
argumentation × 141
ethics × 42
rhetoric × 35
philosophy-of-science × 23
epistemology × 22
debate × 19
probability × 17
terminology × 16
cognitive-bias × 16
paradox × 15
theology × 13
reason × 13
philosophy-of-mathematics × 11
reference-request × 9
metaphysics × 8
philosophy-of-logic × 7
skepticism × 7
induction × 7
rationality × 7
syllogism × 7
ontology × 6
philosophy-of-language × 6
political-philosophy × 6