New answers tagged

5 votes

On a reductionist/functionalist account of consciousness, would we have ethical obligations toward robots?

This is easy to approach with the proper definitions. Morals are a set of rules which improve social interactions (for multiple goals, for example, survival: it is not moral to kill because it reduces ...
RodolfoAP's user avatar
  • 6,831
5 votes
Accepted

On a reductionist/functionalist account of consciousness, would we have ethical obligations toward robots?

If robots achieve (human-level) consciousness, we likely wouldn't have a good differentiating criteria between human and robot for ethical consideration. On a related note, vegans argue that we don't ...
NotThatGuy's user avatar
  • 5,522
-3 votes

On a reductionist/functionalist account of consciousness, would we have ethical obligations toward robots?

Consciousness cannot arise out of a machine. If it could we would have seen it, even in a basic level. If on the other hand you believe that a machine can be made as having consciousness by design, ...
Ioannis Paizis's user avatar
0 votes

Way to find a middle ground between functionalism and "panpsychism"?

I do not know. But it is a good question. My understanding is that functionalism refers to minds. Panpsychism proposes consciousness at the universal and fundamental levels. Panpsychism is not ...
Meanach's user avatar
  • 1,890

Top 50 recent answers are included