New answers tagged

0

The interpretation of QM via act and potency is most promising so far. You can check the book: Aristotle's revenge by Edward Feser. It is a good book that defends Aristotelian notions of act and potency, but it correctly shows that they are necessary presuppositions for modern science. Pretty much, QM is a viewpoint of reality where you look almost ...


0

Yes, there is some interesting things being written in this direction. I would recommend Dr. Wolfgang Smith as a reference, but there is some mistakes and clarification that are needed in this approach. The first thing is an ontological distinction between the physical world and our world, and the distinction between the mathematical description and the ...


1

A sentence p is valid in a class of frames C iff p is true in every frame in the class. The point, informally, is that when there are more frames there are fewer sentences true in all of them. In particular, if C is a subclass of D then every sentence true in every frame in D is also true in every frame in C (since every frame in C is a frame in D), so ...


Top 50 recent answers are included