27
votes
Accepted
Why is Aristotle's objection not considered a resolution to Zeno's paradox?
Aristotle's solution was largely accepted until the end of 19th century when Cantor and Dedekind formalized the notion of continuum in terms of set theory. Under their interpretation time is in fact ...
- 41.4k
26
votes
What is the meat paradox?
There is no necessity for a solution because there is no paradox. This falsely called "paradox" is just a misinterpreted and biased statement, sustained by fallacies and political arguments:
...
- 5,617
13
votes
Are there any philosophy books for an intelligent nine-year-old?
Sophie's World: A Novel About the History of Philosophy (Worldcat link) might be better for an 11 or 12 year-old, but is worth mentioning. It follows a 14 year-old girl who starts wondering about ...
- 5,408
12
votes
Why would this not resolve the Sorites paradox?
Your proposed solution does not solve the paradox.
The whole point of the paradox is that the term 'pile' is vague. That is, given an object (e.g. a collection of grains of sand) it is indeterminate ...
- 6,347
12
votes
Accepted
What the Preface paradox tells us about the principle of explosion
I agree with Just Some Old Man's answer, but to expand on it a little...
If we think of all the statements in the textbook as propositions A1, A2, ..., An then the situation we are trying to describe ...
- 17.5k
11
votes
Are there any philosophy books for an intelligent nine-year-old?
When I was young I really enjoyed the books of logician Raymond Smullyan, who wrote several books of logic puzzles held together with minimal but amusing narratives, including The Lady or the Tiger? ...
- 24.8k
11
votes
Accepted
Is a set containing itself already a paradox?
Russell's paradox arises within naïve set theory by considering the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. Such a set appears to be a member of itself if and only if it is not a member of ...
- 35k
11
votes
Irresistible force paradox as an inconsistent formal theory
This dilemma doesn't really makes sense in modern physics because any macroscopic force accelerates any mass no matter how large, but if you were to axiomatize it in pre-modern physics then yes, it ...
- 4,021
11
votes
What is the meat paradox?
I'm joining the other answers in stating that the so-called "meat paradox" isn't a paradox. Rather, it's an example of the logical fallacy of all or nothing thinking.
I strongly disagree ...
- 717
10
votes
Could it be possible that the universe doesn't exist?
I believe it is impossible. I recommend you read (if you haven't already) Descartes' meditations where he famously concludes I think therefore I am - http://www.sacred-texts.com/phi/desc/med.txt:
...
- 4,461
10
votes
Accepted
Are there rules for dealing with self-reference "paradoxes" in logic?
The same effect can be achieved with a single sentence:"This sentence is false". It is known as the Liar paradox and goes back to an ancient sophist Epimenides. Your two sentences simply split the ...
- 41.4k
10
votes
Accepted
What's the current status of the "paradox of analysis"? And are there any strong and widely accepted resolutions?
A good paper to read on this subject is an old classic: Gilbert Ryle's Systematically Misleading Expressions. (Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 32: 139-170 (1932). Also in his Collected Papers,...
- 17.5k
10
votes
Is finding truth possible?
You've stumbled upon an old problem in philosophy, The Paradox of Inquiry, first formulated in Plato's Meno.
The problem can be reformulated as follows:
Either you know the answer to a question, or ...
- 6,347
10
votes
What qualifies as the solving of a paradox?
Technically speaking, a paradox isn't a problem to be solved in and of itself. A paradox points at a weakness, misconception, or internal contradiction of the philosophical/analytical structures we ...
- 15.5k
10
votes
Accepted
What is the meat paradox?
Humans are irrational. There are countless examples of individual behaviour that shows inconsistency of beliefs. Christians condemn murder, but many will quite happily support the idea of war. People ...
- 1,964
9
votes
Are all paradoxes reducible to one "fundamental" paradox?
You might find Graham Priests book The Limits of Thought helpful in refining your question. Priest argues that
thought runs into true contradictions when it runs up against its own limits
This ...
- 45.6k
9
votes
Accepted
Was Kant anticipating Gödel's incompleteness in his antinomies?
This reminds me of the older question Was Wittgenstein anticipating Gödel? There is more to it in the case of Kant than there was in the case of Wittgenstein though, at least in spirit. One could ...
- 41.4k
9
votes
Why would this not resolve the Sorites paradox?
This is all about the difference between natural language and formal language. In formal language, a term cannot be used unless it's well-defined according to the standards of the language. In ...
- 24.8k
9
votes
What is the meaning of “to fight a Catch-22 is to accept it”?
The definitive way to answer the question is to read the book. Here is how it is presented in the book itself (copied from here):
Yossarian: “You mean there’s a catch?”
“Sure there’s a catch,” Doc ...
- 1,228
8
votes
Accepted
Why would this not resolve the Sorites paradox?
The previous answers betray a lack of familiarity with the literature. Your solution, using the least number principle, essentially works. It is a known argument for epistemism about vagueness, the ...
8
votes
Accepted
Can it be rational to have beliefs one knows to be inconsistent?
It can. Ramsey put it nicely in his "last papers" written around 1929 under the influence of Peirce's pragmatism (quoted from Marion, Wittgenstein, Ramsey and British Pragmatism):
"We want our ...
- 41.4k
8
votes
What is the meaning of “to fight a Catch-22 is to accept it”?
By fighting the rule, you are accepting that it is something you have to deal with, whether obeying, evading, or fighting.
If, for instance, soldiers were allowed to leave base before 9 with permits ...
- 1,594
7
votes
How do mathematicians reconcile that an infinite set does not have to be larger than its proper subset?
There is a long controversy as to what should count as the "size" of an infinite set, and there provably does not exist a notion that satisfies both the bijectivity principle, a.k.a. Hume's ...
- 41.4k
7
votes
Accepted
Is it possible that a question has only two answers?
Answer 1 - 'yes'
Suppose I ask, 'Can Tom walk ?' I am asking about the truth-value of the proposition, 'Tom can walk'. I expect the answer 'Yes' or 'No'. The answer, 'Yes', is right if Tom can walk ...
- 34.7k
6
votes
Are there any philosophy books for an intelligent nine-year-old?
I think Orwell's Animal Farm can also be a good read for 9 year old. Its not strictly philosophical but still worth a read for every smart kid ( and adult ), I think.
- 101
6
votes
Shouldn't Last Thurdayism be able to be proved wrong by Physics?
I think you're misunderstanding the idea behind "Last Thursdayism" on two fronts.
First, as can be seen from the selection of "Thursday", the main point of the posit is to point out a problem in ...
- 24.2k
6
votes
Accepted
Is "Intolerance of intolerance" equivalent to the Liar's Paradox?
If you take a really silly literal view of the sentence the statement is a performative contradiction but not equivalent to the liar's paradox.
Let's say being intolerant of something is along the ...
- 1,936
5
votes
Are there any philosophy books for an intelligent nine-year-old?
I don't want to generalize, but when i was 9 years old (also a fan of logic) i loved reading fantasy novels. I'm 19 now and i don't claim to have any knowledge on how to bring up a child, but maybe it'...
- 415
5
votes
What is the "simple logical truth" that makes omniscience self-contradictory?
I am not surprised at the confusion because the theorem in question is neither simple nor entirely logical. It is Tarski's undefinability of truth theorem, which says roughly that one can not define a ...
- 41.4k
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible