New answers tagged

1 vote

Is there a difference between ambiguity and vagueness?

Vague and ambiguous are overlapping terms and can be used as synonyms. However, the key idea conveyed by vague, which differentiates it from ambiguous, is indistinctness. To take the example cited in ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.4k
0 votes

Is there a difference between ambiguity and vagueness?

Ambiguity and vagueness are not the same thing. Let's see what WP has to say on each. From the WP article on ambiguity: Ambiguity is the type of meaning in which a phrase, statement, or resolution is ...
J D's user avatar
  • 22.8k
1 vote
Accepted

Is there a difference between ambiguity and vagueness?

I am assuming that your question has a philosophical implication. Ambiguity involves two meanings. Vagueness is broader, involving several possibilities. Philosophically, do you mean deliberate ...
Meanach's user avatar
  • 1,890
0 votes

Question about Differences in Existential Quantification

Existent objects don't exist = If x exists then x does not exist (leads to a contradiction but itself isn't a contradiction). We must define a essential property that all existent things have, let's ...
Agent Smith's user avatar
  • 3,208
2 votes
Accepted

Question about Differences in Existential Quantification

This is definitely a question about existential quantification which very much is a subject of ontology. Is there a difference in these sentences? First, note that there are two meanings of 'THERE_ARE'...
J D's user avatar
  • 22.8k
2 votes

Question about Differences in Existential Quantification

The verbs "to be" and "to do" are semantically overloaded with assumptions about existence. Verbs turned into adjectives are semantically unclear: does "an X Y" mean &...
g s's user avatar
  • 3,525
2 votes

Question about Differences in Existential Quantification

Inasmuch as (1) can be paraphrased as (2), and if (2) is determinately meaningful enough (the bare nod towards "objects" makes it seem like a pre-interpreted sentence, though see about ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
3 votes

Is mathematics analytic or synthetic?

There are various ways to define "analytic" and "synthetic". Those word are generally thought to apply to propositions, but there are different ideas of what a proposition is. ...
David Gudeman's user avatar
4 votes

Is mathematics analytic or synthetic?

The two terms, analytic and synthetic, are two possible, mutual exclusive properties of statements. SEP introduces the following definition: “Analytic” sentences, such as “Pediatricians are doctors,” ...
Jo Wehler's user avatar
  • 24.3k
9 votes

Is mathematics analytic or synthetic?

A possible counterargument is that the analytic-synthetic distinction you are using is inherently inadequate and outmoded language and thinking. For the first part, Quine in his Two Dogmas of ...
J D's user avatar
  • 22.8k
3 votes

Is mathematics analytic or synthetic?

For the sake of the OP, I will assume that some version of the analytic/synthetic distinction is defensible. More specifically, I will assume that we can differentiate between analyzing a question ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
0 votes

Is mathematics analytic or synthetic?

all true mathematical statement are "true by defintion" Define "true" and "false". It is simply not possible to define words only using more words without circularity ...
Speakpigeon's user avatar
  • 6,241
0 votes

What are the philosophical solutions to "ship of Theseus" problem of identity?

The phrase 'the ship of Theseus' is inherently vague, as is the phrase 'the same ship'. Whether something is 'the same ship' or not, depends on what you intended to mean by the term 'the same ship'. ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.4k
0 votes

What are the philosophical solutions to "ship of Theseus" problem of identity?

First of all, we must accept that everything changes over time. So trying to solve the identity problem by reference to the material aspect of the thing does not lead us anywhere. The only candidate ...
Ioannis Paizis's user avatar
0 votes

What are the philosophical solutions to "ship of Theseus" problem of identity?

A thorough analysis and a model of the Theseus ship paradox were presented in an article by Dinis: Dinis, Bruno. Equality and near-equality in a nonstandard world. Log. Log. Philos. 32 (2023), no. ...
Mikhail Katz's user avatar
0 votes

What are the philosophical solutions to "ship of Theseus" problem of identity?

The ship of me probably does not contain a single atom that it contained when I was born. Does that matter? Do atoms have identity? If not, then one is the same as another. My consciousness has been ...
Meanach's user avatar
  • 1,890
0 votes

Can a question be bullshit?

Yes. There is a lot of it about, and it is dangerous, as Frankfurt points out. I prefer bollocks (English) or skitters (Scots).
Meanach's user avatar
  • 1,890
2 votes

What's the name of a fallacy when a debater selectively picks facts and ignores others?

There is no single strategy for dealing with fallacies. This is because there are both psychological and philosophical aspects to a debate. This online article (https://effectiviology.com/guide-to-...
Idiosyncratic Soul's user avatar
2 votes

What's the name of a fallacy when a debater selectively picks facts and ignores others?

The selective use of history to explain or justify an argument could fall under multiple fallacies. Their argument could be based on confirmation bias because they have focused a portion of history ...
Willionaire's user avatar
11 votes
Accepted

What's the name of a fallacy when a debater selectively picks facts and ignores others?

It is the cherry picking fallacy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking Edit: Thanks to gidds for pointing out the number of different names for this fallacy. Here are a few: Cherry Picking (...
Idiosyncratic Soul's user avatar
0 votes

Why do some philosphers including Russell paraphrase this sentence?

In the philosophy of language, there is a notion known as deep structure which originates with Noam Chomsky. It is the idea that when one uses language for others, that one provides a shallow syntax ...
J D's user avatar
  • 22.8k
1 vote

Why do some philosphers including Russell paraphrase this sentence?

Note that, "There is an x," can be reordered as, "An x is there," where "there" is an indexical for something like the world/reality/existence (as an atmosphere or ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
5 votes

Why do some philosphers including Russell paraphrase this sentence?

In Fregean terms, a phrase has both a sense and a denotation. For a phrase like "the king of England", the sense is the concept of being king of England, and the denotation is the actual man ...
David Gudeman's user avatar
0 votes

Difficulty finding real life examples of the bad reasons fallacy, is this fallacy committed often?

I think that I may just have witnessed a bad reasons fallacy. In yet another JFK assassination documentary, someone stated that the wound in JFK's throat was obviously an entry wound, and the wound to ...
Meanach's user avatar
  • 1,890
1 vote

In what shape do opposites exist?

The opposite of A is necessarily not A, but not A is not necessarily the opposite of A. For example, both big and industrious are not small, but industrious is not the opposite of small. Opposites are ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.4k
3 votes

Is "that nose is fake" nonsense?

As you know, a fake nose is not a nose. I disagree. You seem to conflate the definitions of "nose" and "genuine nose"; which lies at the basis for your claim, but I'd like to ...
Flater's user avatar
  • 1,292
6 votes

Is "that nose is fake" nonsense?

By your argument a "rubber duck" is nonsense too, as is a "prosthetic leg". Avoiding this type of pedantry/sophistry just renders human conversation too tiring to bother. Anything ...
user3445853's user avatar
1 vote

Is "that nose is fake" nonsense?

Would you consider the part of a statue that is in the middle of the face and is meant to look like a nose and contains nostrils to be a 'real' nose, or even a nose at all? What about Frosty's '...
Jason Goemaat's user avatar
4 votes

Is "that nose is fake" nonsense?

Wittgenstein spent a lot of time on this sort of thing. Is the word "cat" a cat. No. Is a photograph of a cat a cat? No. Is a fake nose a nose? No. But the statement "That nose is fake&...
Meanach's user avatar
  • 1,890
11 votes

Is "that nose is fake" nonsense?

"Fake" in "fake nose" typically means the nose is artificial (e.g. man-made and surgically inserted), not that it's not a nose. One might go one step further and say that it ...
NotThatGuy's user avatar
  • 5,522
45 votes
Accepted

Is "that nose is fake" nonsense?

You understand what the sentence means; therefore, it is not nonsense. We can perform all sorts of analyses to try to analyse why the sentence is meaningful (e.g. the "nose" refers both to ...
wizzwizz4's user avatar
  • 2,037
0 votes
Accepted

Can semantics work independently apart from philosophy?

It implies grammar can work independently apart from semantics. This is trivial. All speakers of a language know that it is always possible to speak meaningless but grammatical sentences. This is ...
Speakpigeon's user avatar
  • 6,241
0 votes

Can semantics work independently apart from philosophy?

The grammar does provide meaning, and is not distinct from it. There are multiple types of semantics. Chomsky's sentence has lexical semantics because you know what each of the words mean. Sentential ...
J D's user avatar
  • 22.8k
1 vote

Omniscience leads to necessitarianism

Let's work in a temporal logic with five tenses Pa, Pr, F, N, and Æ: "It was true that," "It is true that," "It will be true that," "It is never true that," and,...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
0 votes

"Unround circles don't exist." Is it nonsense?

Language is about what symbols mean in groups. Language games are possible because the same symbols in the same groups in informal language can have multiple different meanings. That is: "The X Y ...
g s's user avatar
  • 3,525
2 votes

"Unround circles don't exist." Is it nonsense?

Welcome! Is the sentence you offer: All circles are not unround. nonsense? This is a good question. The first thing you need to understand is that language is conventional. What that means is that ...
J D's user avatar
  • 22.8k
0 votes

"Unround circles don't exist." Is it nonsense?

"unround circles don't exist" is exactly the same sentence as "unround circle is a contradiction". In that sense, neither is more or less nonsensical than the other.
kutschkem's user avatar
  • 2,232
3 votes

"Unround circles don't exist." Is it nonsense?

This is a really a matter of idiom in language. Saying unround circles don't exist is just another way of saying all circles are round. It is like saying odd even numbers don't exist. The sort of ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.4k
5 votes

"Unround circles don't exist." Is it nonsense?

"In this sort of predicament, always ask yourself: How did we learn the meaning of this word ("good", for instance)? From what sort of examples? In what language-games? Then it will be ...
CriglCragl's user avatar
  • 20.5k
-1 votes

How does a language contain its own semantics?

To my understanding, the key sentence is a few lines above. ... it has not always been kept in mind that the semantical concepts have a relative character, that they must always be related to a ...
Ioannis Paizis's user avatar
0 votes

Is necessary existence a property?

If it is then why? My dog exists. The Unicorn doesn't. So, existence is a property of my dog, but it is not of the Unicorn. doesn't it follow that necessary existence is also not a property? The ...
Speakpigeon's user avatar
  • 6,241

Top 50 recent answers are included