New answers tagged

1 vote

if there is less than 100% chance that X might occur, can it occur?

The probability of something happening when added to the probability of it not happening always comes out to be one. Probabilities tell you what the odds are for a certain outcome in a trial which ...
niels nielsen's user avatar
1 vote

Does the incomputability of kolmogorov complexity imply that we will never have a final theory of everything?

No, the incomputability of Kolmogorov complexity merely means that we probably won't know for sure if we have the right TOE. We may indeed one day have a theory that explains the whole universe in a ...
causative's user avatar
  • 10.7k
1 vote
Accepted

Does the incomputability of kolmogorov complexity imply that we will never have a final theory of everything?

Let's start with some comments. You say: I'm putting this question here and not in computer science or math because the incomputability of Komlogorov Complexity and the validity of the Curry-Howard ...
J D's user avatar
  • 20.2k
0 votes

Do mathematicians always agree at the end?

No. There are schools of thought, with many a disagreement about fundamental and philosophical / metaphysical questions regarding what maths is about etc. However, they do tend to agree on those ...
Deipatrous's user avatar
1 vote

Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem

The problem lies with your definition of G. Your G is explicitly self-referential and says of itself that it is not provable. There are many objections to doing this, including the simple one that it ...
Bumble's user avatar
  • 21.9k
3 votes
Accepted

A problem I noticed with if-then-ism in the philosophy of mathematics

Originally, if-then-ism was an approach to the philosophy of mathematics defended by Bert Russell. Russell held that mathematical truths are necessarily true, but that no existential statement is ...
Bumble's user avatar
  • 21.9k
0 votes

Is mathematics based on formal logic, or vice versa?

Mathematics is all-encompassimg per a specific definition, that math is the study of patterns. One could argue-reply that math is about arithmetico-geometric-etc. properties of patterns. From my ...
Agent Smith's user avatar
  • 2,774
0 votes

Is mathematics based on formal logic, or vice versa?

Definitions provide the answer. This couple of definitions, useful for philosophy, are my synthesis, based on the work of others. To start, there's no "formal logic" or "informal logic&...
RodolfoAP's user avatar
  • 6,610
2 votes

Is mathematics based on formal logic, or vice versa?

While Bumble's answer is authoritative, I'd like to reason from what we know about the relationship of mathematics and logic to the human brain and language. The human brain, of course is at least the ...
J D's user avatar
  • 20.2k
3 votes

Is mathematics based on formal logic, or vice versa?

Historically, mathematics and logic evolved independently, though mathematicians have always used forms of logical inference. Euclid, for example, proved things by reductio ad contradictionem which is ...
Bumble's user avatar
  • 21.9k
1 vote

Difference between how a physicist and mathematician approach science?

Looking at Dyson's quote in context (from the talk "Missed opportunities", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 1972), it appears he thought that the divorce had happened as early as the 1860s. One of ...
benrg's user avatar
  • 1,049
2 votes

Difference between how a physicist and mathematician approach science?

It is similar to the difference between a designer and a mechanical engineer working on a merry-go-round. The designer (or physicist) is concerned ultimately with some observable phenomena and general ...
James's user avatar
  • 121
0 votes

Difference between how a physicist and mathematician approach science?

I wonder if: Physics studies what is observable. Mathematics studies what is establishable *) **). *) Maybe a subset of all that is establishable, but it does not study anything that is directly ...
Jani Miettinen's user avatar
2 votes

Difference between how a physicist and mathematician approach science?

Is a theoretical Physicist a physicist? Is an applied mathematician a mathematician? If so, then I believe there isn't a formal distinction in how either approach problems. Now, there are general, ...
Michael Carey's user avatar
3 votes

Difference between how a physicist and mathematician approach science?

Alright, this question begs for some clarification since it seems to equivocate a little on 'science'. The demarcation of science, as Karl Popper called it, is a question about determining what is and ...
J D's user avatar
  • 20.2k
8 votes

Difference between how a physicist and mathematician approach science?

Mathematicians need not practice science at all, except as a personal hobby unrelated to their profession. If you search Physics SE for the inverse of this question - "how does the physicist's ...
g s's user avatar
  • 3,050
8 votes

Difference between how a physicist and mathematician approach science?

Sweeping generalisation alert. Physicists tend to be very pragmatic. If they can find a mathematical technique that predicts the results of experiments, they're happy- they won't have sleepless nights ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 9,087
5 votes

Implicit Models and Probability - are degrees of belief/truth/existence a complete free-for-all?

It makes sense to distinguish between what is true/false about the world and what we as reasoning agents believe about the world. Our beliefs are based on partial information. This does not mean that ...
Bumble's user avatar
  • 21.9k
2 votes

Implicit Models and Probability - are degrees of belief/truth/existence a complete free-for-all?

Well, actually assigning consistent probabilities to everything in a way that conforms to the Kolmogorov axioms is, in practice, impossible. Humans cannot do it. Computers can't do it. It's too hard. ...
causative's user avatar
  • 10.7k
3 votes
Accepted

Are there different forms of rigor, and if so, are some forms of rigor more rigorous than others?

The SEP article on vagueness includes these two passages (early on): Inquiry resistance recurses. For in addition to the unclarity of the borderline case, there is normally unclarity as to where the ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
0 votes

Does significance testing contain a logical flaw or not?

In frequentism probability applies to the observed data given a probability model, but not to the model or its parameters itself. There is no well defined probability for a null or alternative ...
Christian Hennig's user avatar
0 votes

Is mathematics an art?

I'm wanted to answer this duplicate: Is Mathematics an art or a science? I would say that Mathematics is a plutonic discipline. Mathematicians are trying to discover something that exists outside of ...
Tom Huntington's user avatar
1 vote

Does significance testing contain a logical flaw or not?

It is not so much that the hypothesis is improbable if we see significant observations, but that the frequentist considers that the hypothesis merits rejection. If the distinction seems subtle, see if ...
Bumble's user avatar
  • 21.9k

Top 50 recent answers are included