New answers tagged

0 votes

How does quantum mechanics affect the probability of macro events?

Quantum mechanics is a theory that describes the behavior of nature at the scale of atoms and particles. You describe "macro events" as socio-political manifestations. Interractions between ...
Ioannis Paizis's user avatar
1 vote

How does quantum mechanics affect the probability of macro events?

As currently written, the OP is not conceptually consistent. It starts well, with "Events in the world can be described on the macro scale or the micro scale." Evidently true. Almost ...
Olivier5's user avatar
  • 1,707
1 vote

How does quantum mechanics affect the probability of macro events?

An attempt to answer your title question “How does quantum mechanics affect the probability of macro events?“ is the mechanism of decoherence. On the level of microphysics quantum mechanics rests on ...
Jo Wehler's user avatar
  • 24k
0 votes

How does quantum mechanics affect the probability of macro events?

I wait for a Geiger counter to count 100 events, then I go for breakfast. Now I have moved a quantum event into a macroscopic scale. Because I went for breakfast 10 seconds later, I bumped into a ...
gnasher729's user avatar
  • 5,243
2 votes

How does quantum mechanics affect the probability of macro events?

It depends on the nature of the events. Some physical systems are very susceptible to microscopic changes and others are not. Take a Geiger counter connected to the launch console of the US nuclear ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.1k
3 votes

How does quantum mechanics affect the probability of macro events?

To my eye, it looks like multiple questions are being asked at once, so I'm going to try to pick them out and answer them: Is quantum mechanics deterministic, or probabilistically random? You'll read ...
TKoL's user avatar
  • 174
0 votes

Would a nonlocal interpretation of quantum mechanics be more parsimonious?

Serious philosophers of science have generally considered "parsimony" to be only a suggestive criterion, as it is too vague a term to actually use to justify any conclusion. Karl Popper, ...
Dcleve's user avatar
  • 10.5k
1 vote

Would a nonlocal interpretation of quantum mechanics be more parsimonious?

There is a controversy that is commonly described as being about the interpretation of quantum theory. These different interpretations are actually different accounts of what is happening in reality ...
alanf's user avatar
  • 7,420
0 votes

Would a nonlocal interpretation of quantum mechanics be more parsimonious?

In qm "a definite world" and "realism" are old concepts no matter how you make the interpretation. Bohmian mechanics replaces the "undecided position" of particles by ...
Ioannis Paizis's user avatar
0 votes

Would a nonlocal interpretation of quantum mechanics be more parsimonious?

Quantum mechanics (QM), as long as speaking about undisturbed elementary particles, deals with a world of possibilities. Reality originates when we force the microworld by an experiment to create a ...
Jo Wehler's user avatar
  • 24k
2 votes

Is time not perceivable without motion or change?

If you are talking about physical versus psychological time, the relation between time, motion, and change comes up again and again. In modern physics, of course, we have v = x/t which rewritten is t =...
J D's user avatar
  • 22.7k
4 votes

Is time not perceivable without motion or change?

The concept of change presupposes the concept of time because change is defined by comparing the state at two different points in time. Because you ponder whether the relation of time and change is a ...
Jo Wehler's user avatar
  • 24k
3 votes

Is time not perceivable without motion or change?

Your question doesn't have a meaningful answer, because it pre-supposes something that is physically impossible. In effect, what you are asking is what would be the implications for time if we ignore ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.1k
-1 votes

Does Quantum Entanglement Disprove the Principle of Locality?

It doesn't violate locality as entanglement happens because the eyes of YHVH sees it. This is the source of entanglement. The notions of particles changing at a distance is a misguided notion in ...
Marxos's user avatar
  • 739
1 vote

Does quantum mechanics break the principle of local causality?

This question is about the interpretation of quantum theory (QT). The most popular interpretation at the moment is Everett's Many Worlds model and this will be used here. According to QT a particle is ...
John Sydenham's user avatar
0 votes

Does Quantum Entanglement Disprove the Principle of Locality?

The top answer here simply defines locality to mean not allowing super luminal signaling. But that is not the traditional definition of locality. The fact that there is a joint wave function that ...
thinkingman's user avatar
  • 8,254
1 vote

Does quantum mechanics break the principle of local causality?

It certainly seems that way. Entanglement experiments show that interactions in one place can affect interactions in another without there being sufficient time for a cause to propagate from one to ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.1k
1 vote

What kind of philosophy of the foundations of physics can there be?

Hmmm. I am not a logician, and just the abstract of that link appears to be in a foreign language to me! However, I think I can answer your question anyway. There were two different things that ...
Dcleve's user avatar
  • 10.5k
0 votes

What kind of philosophy of the foundations of physics can there be?

I have looked at your citation, and think that the topos approach may have merit. I would like to answer your more general question in your second bullet point about the philosophical foundation of ...
Meanach's user avatar
  • 1,593
0 votes

Does quantum mechanics mean that we are far behind in understanding the physical universe?

So, what do you think understanding is? In science, it generally means having models of the world that make correct predictions. The photoelectric effect, Brownian motion, and the ultraviolet-...
CriglCragl's user avatar
  • 20.5k
1 vote

How does Quantum Mechanics affect the modern account of free will and determinism?

The question of free will is not "could it have been otherwise?' It is "could I have had an effect on the outcome?" Could I have chosen an ice cream and thereby affect the outcome? The ...
H Dresden's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Does quantum mechanics mean that we are far behind in understanding the physical universe?

Just to add one further aspect to the answer of @MarcoOcram. My answer refers only to your title question: Since about one hundred years quantum mechanics teaches us the hard lesson to dismiss the ...
Jo Wehler's user avatar
  • 24k
3 votes

Does quantum mechanics mean that we are far behind in understanding the physical universe?

There seem to me to be several misconceptions in your question. Quantum mechanics isn't a replacement for Newtonian- the two are different models of reality, with different realms of applicability. ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.1k
3 votes

Does knowledge of the scientific context aid consideration of philosophical questions?

It is not so much that "knowledge of the scientific context aids consideration of philosophical questions" but more to the point, the knowledge of the scientific context is necessary to make ...
Mikhail Katz's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Does knowledge of the scientific context aid consideration of philosophical questions?

Sure- if you want to make sense of any kind of issue it is important to know something about it. However, if you are asking whether it makes sense to summarise the science in an area before posing a ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.1k
0 votes

Does knowledge of the scientific context aid consideration of philosophical questions?

Yes but not always. Science provides the glimpse of the actual nature of macro and micro phenomena and helps philosophy in understanding what reality actually is.For example- On the scale of quantum ...
Dheeraj Verma's user avatar
1 vote

How does Quantum Mechanics affect the modern account of free will and determinism?

Your question is impossible to answer decisively because there are so many conflicting interpretations of what free will means, and so many conflicting theories associated with each interpretation. ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.1k
0 votes

Does the law of large numbers explain why quantum mechanics leads to statistical regularities?

I have pondered this, but I'm no scientist. This might be related to the question: "where does the universe end on either macro or micro scale?". But at any scale, any physical phenomenon ...
postoronnim's user avatar
3 votes

Does the law of large numbers explain why quantum mechanics leads to statistical regularities?

Perhaps you might be reading too much into the meaning of the word probabilistic when you ask why does the world have to be probabilistic instead of chaotic. There is a sense in which you can't escape ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.1k
5 votes

Does the law of large numbers explain why quantum mechanics leads to statistical regularities?

The “law of large numbers is a theorem that describes the result of performing the same experiment a large number of times. According to the law, the average of the results obtained from a large ...
Jo Wehler's user avatar
  • 24k
4 votes

Does the law of large numbers explain why quantum mechanics leads to statistical regularities?

Reality comes first, models after The Law Of Large Numbers does not dictate anything. As with any other model of reality, it simply fits observations of reality. The Law Of Large Numbers was chosen to ...
MichaelK's user avatar
  • 5,036
3 votes

Does the law of large numbers explain why quantum mechanics leads to statistical regularities?

For any model of quantum mechanics proposed to explain the behavior of exceedingly small physical systems to be judged potentially correct, it must smoothly cross over into the predictive realm of ...
niels nielsen's user avatar
0 votes

How does Quantum Mechanics affect the modern account of free will and determinism?

The question depends on what kind of stuff the universe is made of. Is it material, mental, or a combination of both? Some forms of panpsychism propose the latter. Bell's Theorem suggests a possible ...
Meanach's user avatar
  • 1,593
1 vote
Accepted

Does Bell’s theorem assume realism? If so, what kind of realism, philosophically?

It's late, so I am tired and apt to make mistakes, but I think that even if the measurement devices are affecting the results of experiments (and by the way, they do), the difficulty with trying to ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.1k
2 votes

Why are nonlocal deterministic theories considered less plausible than indeterminism?

Physics is undetermined, as explained in this answer: Deterministic or stochastic universe? Math and logic are also undetermined, as explained in this answer: Is the Münchhausen trilemma really ...
Dcleve's user avatar
  • 10.5k
0 votes

Why are nonlocal deterministic theories considered less plausible than indeterminism?

Relativity unifies space and time, and in the process also a lot of other seemingly separate concepts: energy and momentum, electricity and magnetism, and so on. Quantum mechanics unifies classical ...
benrg's user avatar
  • 1,169
0 votes

Why are nonlocal deterministic theories considered less plausible than indeterminism?

My instinct is always to remind myself that QM is just a model. It's one that has been phenomenally successful in allowing calculations that agree precisely with experimental results, but it's still ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.1k
0 votes

Why are nonlocal deterministic theories considered less plausible than indeterminism?

I take it nonlocal deterministic means nonlocal hidden variables theories. There is a lot of history on nonlocal hidden variables that I can only jesture at: For many decades von Neumann had an ...
J Kusin's user avatar
  • 2,385
6 votes
Accepted

How do we know that the superposition of states in quantum mechanics is a real phenomenon? Does this have philosophical significance?

The embarrassing truth for physics is that the ontology of quantum theory remains unclear. I might have some objections to your suggestion that electrons might 'disappear' between measurements- ...
Marco Ocram's user avatar
  • 13.1k
-1 votes

The Copenhagen Interpretation: From Quantum Mechanics to Ethics?

Interesting speculation. QM seems to require an observer of the process you describe. Do ethics require conscious apprehension by an observer? I have no idea. But the requirement for consciousness in ...
Meanach's user avatar
  • 1,593
1 vote

How do we know that the superposition of states in quantum mechanics is a real phenomenon? Does this have philosophical significance?

The principle of superposition of quantum states says: If a particle is prepared to be in the superposition state alpha |lambda> + beta |mu> with complex numbers alpha, beta satisfying |alpha|^2 ...
Jo Wehler's user avatar
  • 24k
0 votes

How do we know that the superposition of states in quantum mechanics is a real phenomenon? Does this have philosophical significance?

If it is in fact the case that your alternative theory is equivalent in terms of empirical observations and predictions to the superposition theory, then it is not actually an alternative at all, but ...
Lowri's user avatar
  • 213
0 votes

Do acausal quantum events come in between two classical events?

The way I see it, there is no such thing as a classical determinist world juxtaposed with a quantic non-determinist world. That would be a schizophrenic universe. The world is coherent. It's one world,...
Olivier5's user avatar
  • 1,707
0 votes

Do acausal quantum events come in between two classical events?

No, and here is why. To begin with, the classical and quantum realms are separated by a vast difference in distance scales. the distance scale for the quantum world is ~smaller than an atom and for ...
niels nielsen's user avatar
0 votes

Can Mathematics Fully Describe the Universe?

No it cannot not. The reson for this is that mathematics is not the most fundamental science. What was mentioned even in Euclid? Yes, systems! Theory of systems is the most fundamental science.
Igor Polk's user avatar
0 votes

Can Mathematics Fully Describe the Universe?

Max Tegmark says that the Universe is Mathematics. I happen to agree with his insanity, at least in part. There is mathematics, and then there is Mathematics. The mathematics we humans know about are ...
Lord Alveric's user avatar
0 votes

Can Mathematics Fully Describe the Universe?

To the extent that we can model these physical phenomena as mathematical constructs. There is no theoritical limit to it, althought there is a practical one: the interrelations of these phenomena ...
Ioannis Paizis's user avatar
1 vote

Can Mathematics Fully Describe the Universe?

I see many answers full of certainties, with quotes from Godel's theorem and other sentences that seem to demonstrate that mathematics is a representation of reality and as such cannot explain all of ...
Alessandro Peverelli's user avatar

Top 50 recent answers are included