5 votes

Philosophical Writing at a Graduate level

Writing for philosophy graduate classes expects (at least) the following changes compared with undergraduate philosophy classes: More rigor in argumentation - you need to produce arguments that are ...
virmaior's user avatar
  • 24.6k
3 votes
Accepted

Are old philosophical texts worth reading for ordinary individuals?

I would say that the "ordinary individual" would find it easier to read the older philosophers in their original texts, while contemporary philosophers would be very difficult for such a person to ...
Alexander S King's user avatar
3 votes

Philosophical Writing at a Graduate level

Here's what I suggest: read good philosophy, of the rigorous kind. Good writing can be kinda learned by osmosis. Meanwhile, motivate yourself to write about things you find interesting. Try to be ...
Daniel Coimbra's user avatar
2 votes

Are old philosophical texts worth reading for ordinary individuals?

You raise a good point. I was wondering about it since I read few months ago some greek materialist philosophers, Democritus, Epicurus and Aristippus. I will take this as an example but I am sure you ...
AntiClimacus's user avatar
2 votes

Philosophical Writing at a Graduate level

Good advice on the first 4 (structuring a paper) purpose (https://courses.dce.harvard.edu/~phils4/pryorguidelines.html), audience, argumentation, and narrative. But as for the fifth one style that is ...
Ulrich's user avatar
  • 21
1 vote

Is it useful to say that weak essences exist?

For what it is worth. Non-reductionist modern philosophy rejects essence as non-existent, by focusing on different aspects.
Marquard Dirk Pienaar's user avatar

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible