New answers tagged

0

Wittgensteins early prose was notoriously obscure and difficult to parse. Thus to call it ‘obviously’ anything seems very wrong-headed. This is possibly why he gave up on his former philosophy calling it not philosophy at all and completely wrong. His later philosophy is far more human in that it’s concerned with human values.


1

I would first start with the “fact” that there is an idea of universality and a view of relativism. Even under strong assumptions and rules like seen in axiomatic systems, Gödel’s incompleteness theorems help us understand that there are limits to what universality/existentiality contrast means and all the bunch of paradoxes or aporias directly or not ...


1

The term conditional truth can vary in meaning. In Mathematical logic a conditional truth is a sentence that has the IF . . . THEN . . . Structure. This structure expresses the said relationship is necessary; that is, if the first part after the word IF (words before the THEN) is true then the second part (the words after the THEN) must also be true. You ...


1

According to Wikipedia, Relativism is the idea that views are relative to differences in perception and consideration. There is no universal, objective truth according to relativism; rather each point of view has its own truth. A relative truth in this context might be one that is not viewed as objective. According to Wikipedia, In semantics and ...


0

Philosophy aims at the logical clarification of thoughts. Philosophy is not a body of doctrine but an activity If Godel shows that "P = ΠP and ¬P = Π¬P" are not valid then any use of his ideas that also use "P = ΠP and ¬P = Π¬P" are, assuming we're talking philosophy, surely a misuse of "P = ΠP and ¬P = Π¬P". Any activity that misuses logic (or language) ...


Top 50 recent answers are included