This account is temporarily suspended network-wide. The suspension period ends on Mar 18, 2292 at 16:28.
Ron Maimon's user avatar
Ron Maimon's user avatar
Ron Maimon's user avatar
Ron Maimon
  • Member for 12 years, 3 months
  • Last seen more than 2 years ago
  • New York City
About

I consider myself a logical positivist, although I have never read the logical positivists. I read a little philosophy from time to time, always by skimming (so as to avoid having an aneurysm from getting pissed off). I believe the field is bankrupt intellectual fraud, with a handful of honest practitioners who didn't achieve any progress, because they are drowned out by impressive sounding political clowns. The honest folks are Russell, Carnap, Dennett, and I can't think of anybody else.

The problem with philosophy is not that the questions are bad, nor that they have no answers. The problem is that the mechanism philosophers use to sift through the answers over historical time is political persuasion, and this mechanism doesn't work. The result of political decisions is that obscuratist frauds like Hegel get credit for deep thoughts, and honest folks are marginalized and dismissed. Therefore, I don't see much point in attentively reading the works of philosophers, as their training is of negative value.

But maybe the internet can make some progress in this field.

1
gold badge
15
silver badges
24
bronze badges
113
Score
5
Posts
14
Posts %
22
Score
4
Posts
11
Posts %
21
Score
6
Posts
16
Posts %
20
Score
2
Posts
5
Posts %
19
Score
6
Posts
16
Posts %
17
Score
4
Posts
11
Posts %
Top posts
View all questions and answers