Podcast #128: We chat with Kent C Dodds about why he loves React and discuss what life was like in the dark days before Git. Listen now.
This account is temporarily suspended network-wide. The suspension period ends on Mar 18 '92 at 16:28.
1
reputation
1
12
21

Ron Maimon

I consider myself a logical positivist, although I have never read the logical positivists. I read a little philosophy from time to time, always by skimming (so as to avoid having an aneurysm from getting pissed off). I believe the field is bankrupt intellectual fraud, with a handful of honest practitioners who didn't achieve any progress, because they are drowned out by impressive sounding political clowns. The honest folks are Russell, Carnap, Dennett, and I can't think of anybody else.

The problem with philosophy is not that the questions are bad, nor that they have no answers. The problem is that the mechanism philosophers use to sift through the answers over historical time is political persuasion, and this mechanism doesn't work. The result of political decisions is that obscuratist frauds like Hegel get credit for deep thoughts, and honest folks are marginalized and dismissed. Therefore, I don't see much point in attentively reading the works of philosophers, as their training is of negative value.

But maybe the internet can make some progress in this field.

34
answers
4
questions
~130k
people reached
  • New York City
  • Member for 7 years, 10 months
  • 1,834 profile views
  • Last seen 2 days ago

Top tags (51)

Score 106
Posts 6
Posts % 16
Score 94
Posts 6
Score 85
Posts 3
Score 35
Posts 8
Score 21
Posts 8
Score 19
Posts 2

Top posts (38) All Questions Answers | Votes Newest

View all questions and answers

Badges (34)

Gold

1

Rarest

Silver

12

Rarest

Bronze

21

Rarest