MKR
  • Melbourne, Australia
  • Member for 6 years, 3 months
Stats
113
reputation
221
reached
0
answers
1
questions
About

It is almost impossible for me to read contemporary mathematicians who, instead of saying, ‘Petya washed his hands’, write ‘There is a $t_1 < 0$ such that the image of $t_1$ under the natural mapping $t_1 \to \text{Petya}(t_1)$ belongs to the set of dirty hands, and a $t_2$, $t_1 < t_2 ≤ 0$, such that the image of $t_2$ under the above-mentioned mappings belongs to the complement of the set defined in the preceding sentence …

$\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ $ V. I. Arnol’d

This user doesn’t have any gold badges yet.
This user doesn’t have any silver badges yet.
4
bronze badges

Top tags (2)

Score 0
Posts 1
Score 0
Posts 1

Top posts (1)