Philosophy
Constantly confused's user avatar
Constantly confused's user avatar
Constantly confused's user avatar
Constantly confused
  • Member for 8 years
  • Last seen more than a month ago
Profile Activity
Stats
834
reputation
12k
reached
0
answers
25
questions
Communities
View all
About

An idiot who has always been hopeless in maths, and yet is trying to self-study naive set theory and completeness of logic systems after getting home after work at 8pm everyday. This website is brilliant to someone like me who is not enrolled in a university.

Badges
View all badges
This user doesn’t have any gold badges yet.
5
silver badges
15
bronze badges
Top tags
View all tags
0
Score
11
Posts
44
Posts %
0
Score
8
Posts
32
Posts %
0
Score
7
Posts
28
Posts %
0
Score
7
Posts
28
Posts %
0
Score
5
Posts
20
Posts %
0
Score
5
Posts
20
Posts %
Top posts
View all questions and answers
All Questions Answers
Score Newest
question
11
What is the truth value of the proposition 'All unicorns are beautiful'?
Aug 30, 2015
question
6
What the Preface paradox tells us about the principle of explosion
May 9, 2021
question
5
Why are referring and predicating distinct from illocutionary acts?
Oct 2, 2019
question
4
How to show (in a hand waving manner) that the Godel sentence is true
Dec 24, 2019
question
4
What is the philosophical significance of speech acts/implicature?
Apr 26, 2019
question
4
McGee's argument on restriction of consistent instances of T-schema
Jan 3, 2022
question
3
What does it mean for T-biconditionals to be derivable unrestrictedly?
Dec 29, 2021
question
3
Understanding Hintikka's scandal of deduction (as depicted by D'Agostino)
May 6, 2019
question
3
Given the principle of innocence, how shall we explain logic's usefulness?
Mar 11, 2019
question
3
What's the difference between the necessary and sufficient conditions for an illocutionary act, and the act's constitutive rules?
Aug 6, 2020
Top network posts
View all network posts
11
Proving the inverse of a bijection is bijective
6
Questions on how to prove that a set of connectives is NOT functionally complete
5
Why is the left-intro rule in Sequent Calculus equivalent to elimination rule in Natural Deduction?
5
Show that if $\langle f,g\rangle=\langle k,h\rangle$ then $f=k$ and $g=h$

Your privacy

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.