Stella Biderman
• Member for 6 years, 4 months
• Last seen more than a month ago

## 10 Answers

4 votes

For hundreds of years, mathematicians had played fast and loose with logic. They rarely wrote down axioms, or checked that what they were doing was logically sound beyond the gut check. This had been ...

View answer
4 votes

Yes, pretty much every scientific proposition is dependent upon some philosophical assumptions. We have to assume that we can reason inductively, and that the laws of physics don’t change over time, ...

View answer
Accepted answer
3 votes

The core idea, that what is found in nature is what should be propagated, is a rather controversial concept that's been advanced by various people throughout history. One reason this position is so ...

View answer
3 votes

There are multiple options depending on how the anecdote is presented within the context of the argument. To take an example I recently came across, many autistic people like to be referred to like ...

View answer
3 votes

It depends a bit on what you mean (this question seems vague to me) but it's certainly the case that we can approach knowledge without bias, which is what I think you're asking. Sometimes we have to ...

View answer
3 votes

I wouldn't call this a logical fallacy, because the logical reasoning very well may be correct. A logical fallacy is when there is something wrong with the logical form of the argument, not its ...

View answer
3 votes

I feel like this question is predicated on a misunderstanding of mathematical platonism. Mathematical Platonism is not, strictly speaking, part of Platonism. The name comes out of a kind of analogy to ...

View answer
3 votes

It depends on what objects you want to apply the property to. A property is formally defined as just a set, and so you'd think you can just take the compliment of the set defining P, and have the set ...

View answer
2 votes

There's nothing deeper going on here. An argument, "P proves Q" is valid iff it is true for all assignments P,Q iff P-> Q is a logical truth, also known as a tautology This does invoke soundness/...

View answer
1 votes

I think that pseudoscience is a field that makes scientific claims but is not science, thus giving off the impression that it is scientific. I think it's important to not make it something the ...

View answer