Skip to main content
Franz's user avatar
Franz's user avatar
Franz's user avatar
Franz
  • Member for 7 years
  • Last seen more than 6 years ago
11 votes

Is arguing pro choice because "a woman has the right to control her body" invalid?

3 votes

Does Wittgenstein's Private Language Argument (PLA) commit the fallacy of question begging?

2 votes

What are good arguments against the moral case for vegetarianism?

2 votes

A second indubitable axiom

2 votes

What meant Wittgenstein: ‘I really do think with my pen, because my head often knows nothing about what my hand is writing.'?

2 votes

Concepts with inexistant definitions but for which our common intuition is enough for practical usage

1 vote

How does one comment on does actions similar to Hitler's without invoking Godwin's Law?

1 vote

What is the aim of science?

1 vote

Wittgenstein maintains language is public, can this be correct?

1 vote

Logical proof of the existence of other dimensions

1 vote

Why isn't Cantor's diagonal argument just a paradox?

1 vote

Foundations of logic and reasoning in natural languages

1 vote
Accepted

When does a watermelon cease to be watermelon?

1 vote

What analogies are there for thinking about the flow of time?

1 vote
Accepted

What is the intension of the concept “intension”?

1 vote

Why do we assume good and evil exist?

1 vote

Why can some things apparently be "pretended" but others apparently can't?

1 vote

Earlier and later Wittgenstein - reasons for change in thought, and resultant conclusions

1 vote

Empiricism out the door

0 votes

At what prediction level do we call a physical world theory true?

0 votes

What does later Wittgenstein and earlier Wittgenstein have in common?

0 votes

Ontologically closed statements

0 votes

Are secular ethics intended to be interpreted as objective?

0 votes

Why do I exist?

0 votes

Is it a logical flaw to blame someone for an event if they were simply its causal factor?

0 votes

Do mainstream philosophers believe that Wittgenstein "solved" philosophy?

-1 votes

Can you make a valid inference invalid by adding extra premises?